Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Graphics Software HP Input Devices Technology

HP Restores Creased Photos With Flatbed Scanners 125

Posted by timothy
from the but-can-they-restore-my-boorish-charm? dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Scientists at HP have developed a technique to detect creases in photographs using standard, unmodified flatbed scanners. Once correctly scanned into a computer, software can determine where the photograph's defect is, and artificially correct it to remove any trace of a crease or fold. The result is a spotless JPEG scan from a creased photo, with absolutely no modified hardware and no technical know-how required on the part of the user." They're using multiple light sources to do this, in a way that reminds me of last year's description of 3D image creation using an ordinary digital camera.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

HP Restores Creased Photos With Flatbed Scanners

Comments Filter:
  • Re:!unmodified (Score:2, Informative)

    by muyla (1429487) on Wednesday August 12 2009, @02:15PM (#29041563)

    Yeah, but I'm guessing there was no reason for the scanners to come with individual controls for each light before this technology

  • Re:Wait, wait (Score:5, Informative)

    by SlashDotDotDot (1356809) on Wednesday August 12 2009, @02:20PM (#29041635) Journal

    Won't this ruin my collection of photographs of creased paper?

    Actually, no, it won't. Since the method uses different light sources to build a partial 3D model of the actual shape of the crease, your mere photographic creases won't be detected. You can breathe a sigh of relief.

  • by Animats (122034) on Wednesday August 12 2009, @02:29PM (#29041771) Homepage

    Multiple light sources offer some interesting options. A few years ago, someone modified a digital camera (I think a Canon PowerShot) to have four flash sources instead of the usual one. The camera would take four pictures in quick succession, one with each flash. This allowed better edge detection.

    It was useful for applications like taking a picture of complex, dirty machinery (as under a car hood) and locating the edges, even where everything was roughly the same shade. It also helped when photographing very shiny objects, where the reflection from the flash was a problem. With each reflection from each flash unit in a different place, all reflections could be removed.

    It was too specialized to become mainstream, though. That seems to be the fate of 3D from 2D systems. Good ones have been built [canoma.com], but most have been either discontinued or turned into very expensive products for specialized use.

  • Re:!unmodified (Score:3, Informative)

    by mcgrew (92797) on Wednesday August 12 2009, @02:42PM (#29041963) Journal

    From a different FA: [newscientist.com]

    Now Malzbender's team has achieved the same effect using an off-the-shelf flatbed scanner. They rely on the fact that modern scanners use two separate light bulbs. This feature was added to scanners to improve colour quality, but it also lets you capture the image from two different angles. Re-scanning the object after rotating it 90 degrees provides a total of four different angles, more than enough to deduce 3D information about the object - mathematically, you only need three.

    To fix old, damaged photographs, the software flags every pixel in the scanned image that isn't lying flat against the scanner, an indication that there is a tear or a fold there. Then it automatically replaces those pixels by copying adjacent ones, smoothing over the damaged region

  • by BACPro (206388) on Wednesday August 12 2009, @02:52PM (#29042097)

    Just package that which Google has patented...
    http://hurstassociates.blogspot.com/2009/05/article-patent-reveals-googles-book.html [blogspot.com]

  • Re:Nice (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 12 2009, @02:54PM (#29042133)

    My Angel is a crease-less centerfold

  • Re:Quite so... (Score:3, Informative)

    by dangitman (862676) on Wednesday August 12 2009, @08:58PM (#29046367)

    Which are standard, but in high-quality print studios and other places that would do this kind of retouching by hand anyway in order to preserve or achieve better quality of the final product.

    Actually, most images are restored using digital techniques these days, because it can achieve better results than doing it by hand. You'd only do it by hand if you were talking about something like a historical artifact or unique artwork.

Time sharing: The use of many people by the computer.

Working...