802.11n Should Be Finalized By September 104
adeelarshad82 writes "It's probable that the 802.11n standard will finally be approved at a scheduled IEEE meeting this September, ending a contentious round of infighting that has delayed the standard for years. For the 802.11n standard, progress has been agonizingly slow, dating back almost five years to 2004, when 802.11g held sway. It struggled throughout 2005 and 2006, when members supposedly settled on the TGnSync standard, then formed the Enhanced Wireless Consortium in 2006 to speed the process along. A draft version of 802.11n was approved in January 2006, prompting the first wave of routers based on the so-called draft-n standard shortly thereafter."
Re:California Budget (Score:2, Interesting)
I suspect a lot of companies are gun shy about "rushing" into any standards after the sphincter-busting tactics of Rambus in the JEDEC memory standards fiasco.
Re:Compatibility with Draft-N (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Compatibility with Draft-N (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Yeah, sure. (Score:0, Interesting)
Well, now Gmail is out of beta ... why not?
Re:Compatibility with Draft-N (Score:5, Interesting)
I would think that it would have to be, otherwise no one will use the real standard due to backwards compatibility.
Since I've seen Draft-N devices from different companies that had a bloody hard time talking to each other, I have to ask: If it is Draft-N backwards compatible, WHOSE implementation of Draft-N will it be backwards compatible with?
Re:Hooray, I guess? (Score:4, Interesting)
I get 2 bars on my iPhone from my Linksys WRT 610N from about 20 feet away through two thin walls (in the bathroom of my one bedroom apartment). The upside is that that particular router has 2 radios, so it can run on 2.4GHz simultaneously, allowing me to access it from outside where the 5GHz doesn't reach.