Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Robotics The Military

Robot Warfare Going Open Source 105

destinyland writes "Peter Singer, author of the new book Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century, says 'You can build your own version of the Raven drone, which is a widely used military drone, for about $1,000.' Singer argues that 'just like software, warfare is going open source.' He warns that, ultimately, robot warfare may even expand beyond the military using more DIY and off-the-shelf systems. In addition to 43 countries now working on military robots, there are 'non-state actors ranging from Hezbollah to this militia group in Arizona to a bunch of college kids at Swarthmore... One person's hobby — such as the hobbyist who flew a homemade drone from North America to Great Britain — can be another person's terrorist strike option.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Robot Warfare Going Open Source

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Sure you can (Score:5, Interesting)

    by bughunter ( 10093 ) <[ten.knilhtrae] [ta] [retnuhgub]> on Monday May 25, 2009 @11:47PM (#28090967) Journal

    The submitter assumes that RQ-11B Ravens are simple RC planes. Not quite. They have fully autonomous piloting and navigation features, and include state of the art EQ and IR cameras, and a sophisticated ground system, which includes a CF-19 Toughbook.

    I build cameras for RQ-11B Ravens. The L3-Com transmitters and receivers alone cost ~$5k per set (both air and ground Tx and Rx).

    And still, assuming you can get those surplus for $5, the custom avionics and firmware in the planes will cost you many k$ in equivalent effort to duplicate.

  • Re:Sure you can (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Hairy1 ( 180056 ) on Tuesday May 26, 2009 @12:16AM (#28091137) Homepage

    Okay, so get a phone like the Neo or gPhone - $400, hook up the Servos via USB and a PhidgetController - $200 - and write some custom Python code to make it all hang together. Put it all in a stock Model airplane - $150 -and you have an autonomous model aircraft. Oh - and the phone means you have GPS and GPRS for navigation and control.

    Of course, there are many peaceful purposes for such systems, and it certainly won't carry much of a payload if evil is your objective. And to be honest the evil terrorists seem to do okay with cars and raw explosives. Spending time to make dinky little model planes into weapons doesn't seem high on their to do list.

    Of course, using GPRS isn't going to work in the countryside of Iraq. Then you need something better - but $5K is still pretty high end.

  • Re:Sure you can (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Hairy1 ( 180056 ) on Tuesday May 26, 2009 @12:35AM (#28091237) Homepage

    How about here:
    http://www.towerhobbies.com/products/hobbico/hcaa23_n.html [towerhobbies.com]

    Oh, and I may not make autonomous planes, but I do make autonomous boats, so this is more than talking out my ass; I've actually built this kind of kit.

    Its not like you have an ulterior motive in trying to justify the cost the products your company makes huh. At 25K per plane I would like a bit of that action.

  • by nausea_malvarma ( 1544887 ) on Tuesday May 26, 2009 @12:57AM (#28091349)
    If personal military robots are the wave of the future, what will this mean for 2nd amendment issues? Will there be a movement to protect a citizen's right to run their own robot militias?
  • Re:Sure you can (Score:4, Interesting)

    by hughk ( 248126 ) on Tuesday May 26, 2009 @05:47AM (#28092683) Journal
    This article [bbc.co.uk] discusses bunch of Brazilians have been caught using an expensive ($1K), but still hobbyist, stripped down r/c helicopter to airlift 9 mobile phones to prison inmates. I was also very surprised as I thought the payload, particularly on amateur planes/copters usually wasn't worth a damn. There is a photo of the helicopter and the bodywork has been removed, presumeably to reduce the weight.

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...