Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Asus Confirms Specs, Price of Eee PC 904 and 1000 261

Ken E. writes "Asus seems to have completed its Eee PC laptop line-up, at least for the time being. The Taiwanese manufacturer has now confirmed both specifications and UK pricing of the Eee PC 904 and Eee PC 1000 — its two latest models. The Eee PC 904 is essentially an Eee PC 900 in an Eee PC 1000 chassis (big keyboard, 8.9in screen, Celeron-M 900MHz, Windows XP) and will cost £269 inc VAT. The Eee PC 1000 will cost £349 inc VAT for an Intel Atom (1.6GHz) chip, 10in screen, 80Gb HDD and Windows XP. Looks like those early Eee PC 900 adopters (£329 inc VAT, initially) have been stiffed. Still, that's progress, I guess ..."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Asus Confirms Specs, Price of Eee PC 904 and 1000

Comments Filter:
  • by CastrTroy ( 595695 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @12:11PM (#24119043)
    They keep on bringing up the price and specs on these laptops. When they initially announced the EEE, they said it was going to be a $200 laptop. I still have yet to see one for $200, and with the way they keep on upping the specs, I don't think they will ever get to the $200 price point.
  • Looks like those early Eee PC 900 adopters (£329 inc VAT, initially) have been stiffed. Still, that's progress, I guess.

    No. They got a nice working computer for a price they found reasonable. Something better will come out for less money next year, and again the year after that.

  • by fprintf ( 82740 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @12:15PM (#24119107) Journal

    This is not a good thing for Linux adoption. Earlier articles today pointed to the increased adoption of Linux among housewives, attributed to sales of eeePCs and other cheap laptops. Now that these ones have XP on them, this can't be a good thing for the trend continuing.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @12:17PM (#24119125)

    There are low-end but fully-fledged laptops (i.e. 10s of gigs, 512MB-1GB, 13"+ screen) of the OEM-unbranded type in this price range selling all over the Web in the UK. For 50 quid more, you get an Acer. And they all come with 12 month warranties, often extensible. Who actually wants the eepc?

  • Early Adoption (Score:2, Insightful)

    by JuanCarlosII ( 1086993 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @12:18PM (#24119143)

    I bought my 900 back in May for £329 so I guess that makes me one of the early adopters who are being stiffed, but to be honest that's just what happens whenever you buy electronics. I'll get over it.

    I'm also not entirely convinced that there'd be that much difference in performance for my usage (casual web browsing) between my 900 and the 901, and a few extra gig of HD is fairly inconsequential when I have 320gb of USB drive for transfer/backup between my various computers anyway.

    If I'd known about the new models back when I bought my 900 I *might* have waited for the 1000 series (the reason I didn't get a 70x was because I was holding out for the bigger/vaguely usable screen) but if I'm honest I'd still probably have bought then safe in the knowledge that whatever I bought, whenever I bought it, would be superceded within months anyway. Anyone who complains about their computer hardware being superceded needs to get a grip on reality.

  • Stiffed (Score:4, Insightful)

    by imidan ( 559239 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @12:21PM (#24119225)

    Looks like those early Eee PC 900 adopters (£329 inc VAT, initially) have been stiffed. Still, that's progress, I guess...

    <rant> I never understand this point of view. Especially with computer/tech hardware. Every one of us, when buying a new video card, or a new processor, or whatever, knows that within a few months, the price will come down on the thing we just bought, and a newer, better thing will be out. And I never see people bitching about that. But make it some shiny, all-in-one thing like an iPhone or this Eee PC, and suddenly there's this group of people who are outraged about it. What gives? It's life, you know? You can sit on all of your money and never buy anything, for fear that you could get a better deal tomorrow, or you can buy stuff today and enjoy it. </rant>

    Not that the OP sounded all that bitter about it. It just reminded me of people who do.

  • by Hatta ( 162192 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @12:25PM (#24119267) Journal

    I have to agree. I can spend $200 on a used laptop and it has more than fast enough to do anything I want. But it's not small, and its battery will suck.

    If they'd just make a $200 laptop, I'd buy it. I don't care how slow it is. I did real work on P100s 10 years ago, and I'd be happy to do the same today.

  • arms race. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by apodyopsis ( 1048476 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @12:26PM (#24119285)
    I have always decided to stay out of the arms race attended by PC HW and SW firms.

    Most of my HW is quite old, 7+ years apart from my early adoption of an Asus EEE. was I stiffed on the price? hell no - had it over half a year and makes a good wifi web station.

    I understand the commercial reasons behind the rapid depreciation in HW and SW - but as far as I'm concerned my PC hardware is a tool, like my car. I'm upgrade only when there is a compelling reason or something breaks. Is the arms race a good or bad thing? well it promotes innovation and new technologies so I cannot really argue against it.

    As long as I can still run an up to date distro on my hardware I'm a happy camper. An old PC will let me write SW, surf and do office tasks as well as a new one, and be just as net safe if I keep to a regular upgrade cycle.
  • by Adlopa ( 686151 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @12:28PM (#24119327)
    I suspect that the margins are so low on a $200 'netbook' (which is how these devices are being pitched) that the temptation is to slip in a few more features and nudge up the price in order to make a little more money. It's not quite quite the boiling frog analogy, but it's not far off -- 7" screen too small? Why for only $50 more you can get 8.9"! And there's even a bigger keyboard for just another $30! Before you know it we'll be at the Eee PC 1200 netbook with a 12.1in screen for $700 - or a 'laptop', as such things are more commonly known...
  • by Corf ( 145778 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @12:31PM (#24119417) Journal

    I have a 701. It cost me $399, and I received it on November 2 of last year.

    For the last six months, since I static-zapped my desktop, it's been my only personal computer.

    I'm typing this on it right now, from a plaza in Silver Spring, Maryland. It's a gorgeous day, the fountains are running.

    I am super happy with it.

    I don't feel "stiffed," I feel like I got in on something awesome before it was trendy.

  • We can be sure that Asus will release a cheaper and not-so-beefed-up model for the folks that are waiting for the $200 model.

    Someone will, if not Asus.

  • by Firehed ( 942385 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @12:38PM (#24119505) Homepage

    A very valid point, though even by technology pricing standards, the iPhone's price drop (33% off after two months) was pretty unusual.

  • by eddy ( 18759 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @12:39PM (#24119513) Homepage Journal

    They've always been available in both XP and Linux versions. The difference is that the original 700 version was out using linux first, and XP came later, the newer versions are doing it the other way around. 901 are now becoming available in the west, and so far it's all Windows XP. The cynic in me wonders if Microsoft called Asus up and said "If you ship XP versions one month before the linux versions, we'll give you a nice little rebate on your XP licenses. giddigy"

  • by WonderGod ( 62521 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @12:46PM (#24119635)

    I almost bought a 900 a few wEeeks back. I'm glad I didn't because now I can get a 900 for 399 with a 8.9' screen and 16 gig hard drive at newegg. Or find a good deal on regular 900's at lots of online retailers(100 Mail in rebate). Although the 901 is better, I'd rather save 100 bucks and get a slightly lesser processor. I mean the whole point of this thing is to be simple and surf the web. The upgraded processor isn't really worth the extra 100 IMHO. They really need to get these things in local stores nationwide, and then they'll be cooking.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @12:52PM (#24119727)

    The value of the dollar has turned to shit since they said that.

  • by Hatta ( 162192 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @01:00PM (#24119883) Journal

    I don't want one, but for the opposite reason. I want something slower and cheaper. All I want is something with enough power to SSH into a server over wifi, a qwerty keyboard, and a battery that lasts more than a couple hours. The EEE is overkill, both in performance and price. Is anyone making the device I want?

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @01:01PM (#24119899)

    What's not to like?

    I think the Eee is a perfect candidate for having a trackpoint, it would fit with the compact nature of the Eee. I'd love to see an Eee with one. They don't take up much room and would probably increase productivity.

    Does anyone know of a successful hack that added a trackpoint to an Eee?

    As a bonus if you dropped the touchpad you'd probably gain some room for adding more mods

  • Re:Perfect (Score:5, Insightful)

    by djikster ( 1189729 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @01:06PM (#24119969)
    Currently, the price of the 40Gb SSD exceeds the price of the laptop :)
  • by Znork ( 31774 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @01:08PM (#24120025)

    Personally I find those low-end fully fledged laptops completely worthless. They have little storage, almost no memory, no expansion capability, a pitiful screen, a barely useful graphics card and a painfully slow CPU.

    They're simply not a useful replacement for a desktop. And on top of that they're just not that portable; you dont quickly throw them in your bag, purse or coat pocket and go.

    Still, I have a need for something to take notes, run presentations and look stuff up on when not at the desk. And while I find the low-end laptop unsuitable for the task due to it's desktop-replacement complex, the EEE segment is extremely suitable for the purpose (the £1000+ micro laptop segment is also suitable, but, eh, I'm buying a glorified pencil+paper, not some form of jewelry or fashion statement).

  • by coolsnowmen ( 695297 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @01:37PM (#24120427)

    the world does not revolve around the US dollar.

    Maybe not revolve, but if the world is certainly not independent of it. If the US went into a true depression, do you think europe, japan, china, and the middle east would be completely immune?

    If so you better quote-a-source or flash-an-econ-degree because everything I see has every major foreign market tied in multiple ways to the US's.

    Or did you really just want to claim that all Americans are pompous?

  • by vidarh ( 309115 ) <vidar@hokstad.com> on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @01:51PM (#24120633) Homepage Journal
    Have you tried to LIFT one of the cheap high spec'ed laptops? Most of the cheap laptops weigh in at 3.5kg-4kg. Personally I refuse to buy a laptop about the 2.5kg range. My wife ended up buying a Vaio last year because she got an 11" one at around 1.2kg, but it was 2.5 times the price of an EEE - for what she needs it for an EEE is sufficient, and the small form factor is a huge bonus.
  • by RulerOf ( 975607 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @01:51PM (#24120639)

    I needed a new computer after using the one my parents bought me a decade ago. So I bought a laptop. I promptly put it on my desk, plugged in a mouse, and have never moved it since!

    It was an excellent purchasing decision on my part, seeing as how, for $2000, I got a monstrous 15 inch screen, a 2 GHz Dual Core processor, and 2 gigs of ram!

    Nothing more than that is really necessary, even though for $2000 I could be sitting in front of dual 24" monitors, a quad core chip, 4 GB of RAM and terabytes of storage. Or maybe something with similar specifications, in a desktop form factor, and a much heavier wallet.

    You have no idea how many times I hear the same idiotic story and the bullshit excuses that go along with it. I don't understand people justifying their moronic purchases by using the wrong tool for the wrong job, and I never will.

    Let me see if I can put it in perspective for you. If you owned a box truck and a subcompact smart car, and were faced with the task of moving a house full of furniture, using that EEE every day in a fixed location is like strapping a couch to the top of your smart car after lugging it past the open rear door of your box truck.

    Now, I have to ask, because maybe there's just "something" I don't get: What the fuck is that EEE doing on your desk, serving as your main computer, when a nonportable PC (like your Mac) is much more appropriate and functional? Is there ANY reason, other than "Zomg, It's so cute and portable," to pass up a much more functional, and frankly better in every way given the task, device for something so horribly inappropriate?

    To quote Chris Rock:

    You can drive a car with your feet if you want to; it don't mean its a good fucking idea!

    On a side note, my friend sold his laptop and bought the first EEE because he said the enhanced portability would allow him to use it better and more often that what he had currently, even though I told him it was a waste of money.

    Two months ago, he bought a 15-inch Compaq laptop that was on sale for the same price he got the EEE for. It's a much more appropriate machine.

  • Same here - the 1000 doesn't appeal to me at all. It's too small to be my primary machine, and too large to be suitable to carry around whenever I just want to be able to work an hour or two on the move.
  • by Fred_A ( 10934 ) <fred@f r e d s h o m e . o rg> on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @01:57PM (#24120721) Homepage

    That only makes the quoted prices worse. People in the UK and EU are looking for a 100 Euro or Pound notebook.

    Theoretically we ought to be expecting something like that (hah), but we know that any $300 laptop will turn into 350 € laptop *if we're lucky*.
    Typically most vendors make some kind of reverse currency conversion and $300 are more like 450 €...

  • Re:In US dollars (Score:3, Insightful)

    by vidarh ( 309115 ) <vidar@hokstad.com> on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @02:02PM (#24120811) Homepage Journal
    Weight and size. Cheap laptops are usually heavy and big. The EEE is the cheap and small, so it competes against high priced Vaio's etc. for people who want a small and light laptop but don't need the performance / memory of the expensive models.

    For comparison a Vaio in the same weight class costs 2.5 times as much in the UK, and is larger.

  • by RustinHWright ( 1304191 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @02:12PM (#24121005) Homepage Journal
    The 700 line is a 9" screen form factor with a dinky little screen sitting in it like a VW Bug parked at a truck stop. My concern is device size, not screen size, so afaic, the 700 is the worst of both worlds. Not to mention the point made by the AC below that the 700 Linux boxen are out of stock left, right and center.
  • I don't understand people justifying their moronic purchases by using the wrong tool for the wrong job, and I never will.

    Neither do I. Those people drive me nuts. For me, the Eee turned out to be perfect for my needs and it was the Mac that was the wrong tool for the job.

    using that EEE every day in a fixed location is like strapping a couch to the top of your smart car after lugging it past the open rear door of your box truck.

    Very true - if I used it from a fixed location. Which I don't.

    Now, I have to ask, because maybe there's just "something" I don't get: What the fuck is that EEE doing on your desk, serving as your main computer, when a nonportable PC (like your Mac) is much more appropriate and functional?

    I think you're hearing voices, because I never said anything like that. The Eee is my main computer now, and I use it from the living room, bedroom, kitchen table, and pool in the backyard (wanna try floating with an eMac in your lap?).

    Two months ago, he bought a 15-inch Compaq laptop that was on sale for the same price he got the EEE for. It's a much more appropriate machine.

    So your friend miscalculated his needs and found something that better fit his actual situation. Good for him! On the other hand, I always thought I wanted/needed a full-size desktop computer, and it turns out that I really wanted/needed a tiny little laptop that can float around the house without hassle.

    What I don't get is people who get so worked up about other people having different needs than themselves. I'm not cursing at you for using a desktop, and don't really understand why you're cursing at me for using an UMPC.

  • by StarKruzr ( 74642 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @03:09PM (#24122135) Journal

    Which is portability. Then people get that portability and decide they want better specs. The price goes up.

    There's nothing wrong with this.

  • Re:Perfect (Score:4, Insightful)

    by bfree ( 113420 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @03:41PM (#24122697)
    I don't believe they use a 40GB SSD though, more like an 8GB SSD and a 32GB usb stick (I picked one of those up for STG70 a couple of months ago).
  • by bersl2 ( 689221 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @04:05PM (#24123217) Journal

    I think the point is that light and portable is (finally) down to similar price points ro clunky desktop replacements. For the longest time, these light machines cost twice as much as middle-of-the-road laptops.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @04:09PM (#24123295)
    I hate it when people put half of their post in the title! I start reading what they have to say, but then realize that their sentence fragment makes no sense whatsoever...oh, I have to read that bit up there too in order to piece together your post. brilliant.
  • by TeacherOfHeroes ( 892498 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @07:37PM (#24127077)

    Of course the world isn't independent of the US dollar. The world also isn't independent of the Euro, either, or just about any other currency, for that matter. Isn't that the whole point of this globalization thing -- that people rely on each other, that no one is wholly isolated anymore?

    Maybe I'm misinterpreting you here, but your response makes it sound as if you're arguing that the world is uniquely dependant on the US dollar, which just isn't the case.

It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.

Working...