IBM Water-Cools 3D Multi-Core Chip Stacks 170
An anonymous reader writes "Water cooling will enable multi-core processors to be stacked into 3D cubes, according to IBM's Zurich Research Laboratory which is demonstrating three-dimensional chip stacks. By stacking memory chips between processor cores IBM plans to multiply interconnections by 100 times while reducing their feature size tenfold. To cool the stack at a rate of 180 watts per layer, water flows down 50-micron channels between the stacked chips. Earlier this year, the same group described a copper-plate water cooling method for IBM's Hydro-Cluster supercomputer. The Zurich team predicts high-end IBM multicore computers will migrate from the copper-plate water-cooling-method to the 3-D chip-stack in five to 10 years." Reader Lilith's Heart-shape adds a link to the BBC's article on these internally-cooled chips.
180 Watts per layer (Score:2, Informative)
Basic Physics of Thermoconduction (Score:5, Informative)
Upgrades to cotrol systems needed (Score:3, Informative)
It's quite the opposite (Score:4, Informative)
Actually boiling removes much more heat than conduction. This is the principle used in heat pipes [wikipedia.org], where you want a low boiling temperature, because that will be the temperature in the hot side.
Re:Alcohol cooling is a bad idea. (Score:5, Informative)
Multicore resource portal (Score:2, Informative)
Re:When will water cooling be feasible for ME? (Score:3, Informative)
Sure. The interconnects could be shorter and thus impose much less lag. Core one wouldn't need to go through core two to talk to core three, etc.
Re:Alcohol cooling is a bad idea. (Score:1, Informative)
Re:When will water cooling be feasible for ME? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Electrolysis (Score:2, Informative)
Sorry, but I'm a tad bit excited by this - as I'm sure you can tell.
Re:CMOS = Power Efficient??? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Alcohol cooling is a bad idea. (Score:2, Informative)
tert-butanol 82.4 C
2-propanol 82.7 C
2-methyl-2-propanol 83 C
2-butanol 94 C
1-propanol 97 C
2-methyl-2-butanol 102 C
2-methyl-1-propanol 108 C
1-butanol 117.7 C
2-methoxyethanol 124 C
3-methyl-1-butanol 130 C
2-hexanol 136 C
1-pentanol 138 C
1-hexanol 151.4 C
2-butoxyethanol 171 C
1-heptanol 176 C
1-octanol 195 C
1-nonanol 215 C (freezing point is -7 C)
1-decanol 231 C (freezing point is +7 C)
The boiling point of 1-octanol is pretty good, so it could be used to cool reliably at higher temperatures than water. Also, its viscosity is only one quarter that of water, so it can be pumped through narrow channels more easily (higher flow at lower pressure) to achieve higher heat removal. It remains liquid down to -16 C, so it would not have to be purged from the chip for storage in cool environments.
Re:water? (Score:1, Informative)
From wikipedia [wikipedia.org] (or any grade school chemistry book):