Is Cheap Video Surveillance Possible? 700
timholman writes "After a series of burglaries and auto break-ins in my neighborhood, I'm thinking about adding some video security cameras to my home. To me, the object isn't just deterrence — if someone tries to break into my house or my car (parked on the street in front of my house), I'd like to provide a high-quality image of the perpetrator to the police. Inexpensive video surveillance systems, with their atrocious image quality, are nearly useless. The problem is being able to get good image quality at an affordable price. After some research, I've decided that using network cameras to FTP images to a central server over a HomePlug network is the best solution. However, good megapixel network cameras (e.g. Stardot or Axis cameras) can easily cost more than $1,000 each. Has any of you dealt with a similar situation? Is there any way to get reasonable quality (preferably open source) daytime and nighttime video surveillance equipment for home use without paying an arm and a leg? Is it better to go with a couple of expensive cameras, or a multitude of inexpensive cameras? Is paying two to three thousand dollars simply unavoidable if I want to monitor my front and back yards?"
easy and cheap solution (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Dog (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Save your money (Score:5, Funny)
That solution won't save money. Do you have any idea how much it costs to train a dog to safely and effectively handle a firearm?
Don't Live in a Crappy Neighborhood? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:But how to monitor the surveillance cameras ... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Old Macs (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Where do you live? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Dog (Score:5, Funny)
Re:IQeye (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Prevention is better than prosecution... (Score:4, Funny)
uhhhhh, could you call that Kleptus Interruptus?
Re:How about a fake dog (Score:3, Funny)
Re:The surveillence is the easy bit (Score:2, Funny)
There were some stupid crook stories too (hint: if you're stealing a car, with boat attached, remember to hook up the trailer lights)
You call THAT a stupid crook story? Good grief, get a sense of perspective. I can assure that I am not stupid, but nevertheless, if I was stealing a car with boat attached, I wouldn't think to check that the freaking taillights were plugged in.
I suppose the crook would have been stupid in your mind if he hadn't checked the tire pressure or oil level of the vehicle he was stealing either.
Has it occurred to you that some people don't have the time to do a pre-heist 101 point inspection of every vehicle they thieve? Some times you need to take shortcuts in the name of efficiency! Freaking taillights, my ass.
Re:Advice from law enforcement (Score:3, Funny)
This system must really excel at catching criminals who don't have a 2:1:1 ratio like the rest of us.
You don't need any cameras (Score:4, Funny)
If you live in the UK, leave the keys in the ignition, with a note apologizing for not having the car warmed up for them, along with $100 on the seat so they can by 1/2 tank of gas.
Re:IQeye (Score:5, Funny)
The only other available places require machine guns or anti-tank weaponry
Re:A way to get the intruders attention (Score:3, Funny)
Re:IQeye (Score:2, Funny)
Re:IQeye (Score:3, Funny)
Perhaps you should inform the Police and security agencies that their favorite choice of weapon is useless against such a well shielded adversary. I'm sure they will be glad to know BEFORE they trust their lives to such a useless weapon.