The End of Non-Widescreen Laptops? 668
Santi Onta writes "Today Lenovo retired the last NON-widescreen laptop they offered (the T61 14.1) from the market, and Lenovo is just an example (Apple, Sony, HP, etc. are the same). I understand the motivation behind all the laptop manufacturers to move to widescreen: they can still advertise that they offer 14.1 or 15.4 screens, but the screen area is smaller, and thus they save more money. Some people might like widescreens (they are useful for some tasks), but any developer knows that vertical space matters! Less vertical space = less lines of code in the screen = more scrolling = less productivity. How can laptop manufacturers still claim that they look after their customers when the move to widescreens is clearly a selfish one? I just wish they offered non-widescreen laptops, even if it were for a plus (that I'd be more than happy to pay)." I've always preferred the widescreen aspect ratio -- vertical matters, but having two nice wide columns always mattered more to me. Until this reader's submission, I hadn't realized that it was such a contested issue. Does this matter?
Pixels Are Your Friend (Score:5, Informative)
I admit that stuff on the laptop screen is a bit small (it is ~15 inch diagonal), but when using my 24 inch monitor (which I use 99.9% of the time) the display is a thing of beauty.
A Few More Points to Weigh (Score:4, Informative)
At the company I work at, there is extreme contempt for hooking widescreen laptops up to projectors and smartboards as the user on the laptop cannot view what they are doing on the laptop's screen (if they do it is super distorted to fit on the other viewing device). While this may sound trivial, imagine sitting at a desk facing a class of 100+ people who are looking at huge screens behind you. Not only end consumers but also the enterprise prefers the choice. Although this is kind of a non-issue if only Lenovo is doing that because my employer won't buy from China
And--I'm sure this will come up several times--there is my DVD collection which is mostly widescreen as I have a widescreen TV at home. For this reason, I personally may prefer a widescreen. However, most DVDs are non-widescreen and laptop screens are small enough as it is without having the lost real-estate. Again, probably a trivial aspect unless you travel and watch DVDs a lot.
I do enjoy Warcraft on wide screens though
I agree with the submitter that it is important indeed to leave this decision up to the consumer. Actually, since this is just Lenovo, I wonder if this will hurt their sales? If the consumers want it, the companies will notice
X Series (Score:5, Informative)
Really? [lenovo.com]
Re:A Few More Points to Weigh (Score:5, Informative)
That's odd. All the laptops I use happily show an 800x600 image square in the middle of the screen when hooked up to a projector. (Either that or I can use it as a second screen. Depends on how your laptop is configured.) You may want to play around in the Display Properties and see if you can reconfigure your laptop to handle that situation correctly. In my experience, there are very few widescreen devices that lack support for 4:3 mode with black bars.
X61? (Score:3, Informative)
Parent Contains Malicious Links! (Score:5, Informative)
Anything with http://rds.yahoo.com/ [yahoo.com] because it is a breeding ground for redirected harmful scripts! Send a message to Yahoo to stop this!
Re:Are you kidding me?? (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Move to Widescreen (Score:4, Informative)
That basically covers the issue. Because of the large (due to the HDTV push) number of widescreen panels being created, economies of scale are coming into play. Which means that with less and less 4:3 ratio glass being created, prices on 4:3 are going up while 16:9 and 16:10 glass is getting less expensive.
(Personally, I like my widescreen T61. It's almost enough that I can keep two documents side-by-side on the screen instead of shunting the 2nd document off to a 2nd display.)
Re:A Few More Points to Weigh (Score:2, Informative)
Personally, I like the widescreens. MacOS seems designed for it... that dock fits great on the left or right when you have a widescreen. Even the stupid Vista sidebar seems to assume you have space on the side. It also seems more natural for programs that keep a lot of toolbars open, such as photoshop.
Usability Issues (Score:5, Informative)
A display with a higher vertical to horizontal ratio makes it easier to read and edit text on. Text columns are naturally narrower so your eyes have less problems tracking horizontally and the columns are also higher which means that there is less scrolling. It also means that menu bars at the top or bottom of the screen or window take up a smaller percent of the vertical presentation, which uses the display more effectively.
Widescreen is better suited to video and pictures than it is for text. It would be nice to have displays optimized for text so that people who work with text can do so more effectively. One thing I try to do to counteract a widescreen is to place as many elements as I can (toolbars, etc.) in a vertical orientation rather than a horizontal one. By maximizing my vertical space and using the horizontal space to stack bars side-by-side I do what I can to create a narrow, high space for text. It would be much better to have a screen that was oriented this way in the first place but if you can't find one...
Grammar nazi says: (Score:0, Informative)
Better for developers (Score:3, Informative)
I prefer widescreen laptops for development (Score:2, Informative)
Also, using a modern IDE like visual studio or eclipse on a 15" monitor can be somewhat miserable. Those are clearly designed to be used on a widescreen monitor, imo given the default layouts and how small your code window ends up.
Buy Small Business Notebooks! (Dell/HP) (Score:2, Informative)
Re:A Few More Points to Weigh (Score:3, Informative)
We faced the same problem and were able to make it work (with the ATi control panel on Mobility Radeon X1300)
Re:I just wish... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:A Few More Points to Weigh (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Brevity. Soul of wit. (Score:5, Informative)
The Linux coding style guide [reptiles.org] contains wisdom on this:
Re:13" MacBook Pro (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/12/resellers-say-macbook-air-sales-arent-as-brisk-as-original-macbook/ [crunchgear.com]
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/165960/macbook-air-sales-deflated.html [pcpro.co.uk]
I can't locate sales figures for the 12" PB G4, but I can state anecdotally that I saw many of them, with satisfied owners. A reasonably fierce following, too. [petitiononline.com] Conversely, I have not seen a single MB Air nor do I know anyone, including all members of a Mac users' mailing list I am on, who owns one or even wants to. I don't think Apple chose the most profitable market segment here.
Re:A Few More Points to Weigh (Score:3, Informative)
We have our NEC projectors attached to the 100 Mbit ethernet and can access them via an application on the laptop. Works well for presentations, but is too slow for moving pictures.
Re:Parent Contains Malicious Links! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:A Few More Points to Weigh (Score:3, Informative)
90% of their TV offerings today are widescreen. I'd expect their DVD offers to follow the same trend.
Much ado about nothing (Score:3, Informative)
I'm not all that put out, honestly. I've got a 1680x1050 widescreen on my laptop, and if it were 1600x1200 I'd get a few extra lines of text, but big deal. My previous favored resolution was 1280x1024, so I actually get more pixels in both dimensions.
I can also watch 16:9 movies on it when I'm not coding, and I like that feature more.
Re:Wider Screen Tall Screen (Score:3, Informative)
Two words: Line breaks
They not only make your code fit better on a narrow screen, they also make it more readable. Also, if you're indenting so far that you need the horizontal space, you really should refactor -- your function is too complex.
Although the old standard of 80 columns is no longer required for printing, it's still a pretty good idea.
The real reason (Score:1, Informative)
Also, there is usually no less vertical space on a widescreen. The have higher pixel density instead. For example:
Standard SXGA+: 1400x1050
Widescreen WSXGA+: 1680x1050
Re:If you care about vertical space then... (Score:3, Informative)