Oil Deposit Could Increase US Reserves 10x 869
HighWizard notes the upcoming release, on Thursday, of a report by the US Geological Survey on the Bakken Formation. This is an oil field covering 200,000 square miles and underlying parts of North and South Dakota, Montana, and Saskatchewan. A geologist who began surveying the field, before dying in 2000, believed it may hold as much as 1 billion barrels of recoverable oil. Later estimates have ranged to the hundreds of billions of barrels. Such a reserve would go a long way toward securing US energy independence.
6000SUX (Score:4, Funny)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=FLMVNyYb1SE [youtube.com]
We have more oil? (Score:5, Funny)
I wonder what this does for theories of for oil. Some people theorize that petroleum is left over from the formation of the earth, rather than created by the fossilization of carbon life forms. [wikipedia.org]
This reserve may be difficult to tap fully because of the nature of the rocks. I wonder if nuclear weapons would help. I guess it depends on how and where they were deployed.
How many tons of CO2 would be created with the burning of 500 billion barrels of oil? BTW, 500 billion barrels of oil would be about 1/6th of the world's oil reserves.
Is there really that much oxygen in the atmoshpere to burn all that? Let's see. The earth's atmosphere weighs 5 quadrillion metric tons... [wikipedia.org] OK, no worries there.
but, but, the global warmings! The sea level could rise 50 feet in the next century. [checks current elevation of homestead] OK, that's fine.
But it would be hot! [checks average temps for homestead] ok, yeah, I can get behind that.
What about the polar bears? [checks polar bear shares in 401K] We're looking good!
But the crops! The crops won't grow! [Checks map of world showing land in permafrost [uwsp.edu]] Looks like a net gain to me.
Ok, yeah! We have more oil! Can we exploit it faster than we have more people?
Re:Bad news for Saskatchewan (Score:3, Funny)
Dear Canada, (Score:5, Funny)
Concerning this oilfield which lays below the Dakotas and Saskatchewan: if you have a milkshake, and I have a milkshake, and I have a straw. There it is, that's a straw, you see? You watching? And my straw reaches acroooooooss the room, and starts to drink your milkshake... I... drink... your... milkshake! SLURP I drink it up!
Bludgeonly yours,
the USA
Ssh! Don't tell anybody! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Securing energy independece...until it's gone (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Dear Canada, (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I suppose a good question is... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:We have more oil? (Score:5, Funny)
Perhaps you can explain--exactly under what circumstances do nuclear weapons not help?
That said, those sound like fightin' words so I'd be careful. We might not have much up in Montana, but we do have nukes. Some 200 ICBMs [nukewatch.com] with several MIRVs to be exact. You want our oil? Come and get it!
And in other news ... (Score:4, Funny)
... Canada has just begun to beef up the military defenses on its long southern border.
Re:Ssh! Don't tell anybody! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:biotic origin (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Securing energy independece...until it's gone (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Nice (Score:4, Funny)
Re:We have more oil? (Score:5, Funny)
Obviously, we should grow more of these beans.
Re:Dear Canada, (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Securing energy independece...until it's gone (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Dear Canada, (Score:5, Funny)
That may be true, but thanks to the Alberta oil boom of late, we are the current leading edge of new tech for recovery of non-standard types of oil. If you want to have a race to see who can get it out first, we'll even give you a 2-year head start, just to make it sporting.
Yes, yes, we all know you could invade us without breaking a sweat, but can you live without the oil coming in from Alberta? How about the electricity that comes from James Bay Hyrdo? If you wanna see what life would be like without it, imagine everything east of Chicago living under a blackout. Yes, you have a great big expensive army, but I don't think you have enough troops to protect 2000 miles of power lines from being dynamited.
Oh, yeah, and we're a nuclear 'threshold' country, so we could fire up a nuke and a delivery vehicle that could hit Washington in 2 or 3 years max. So draw when ready, pardner.
Sincerely,
The Dominion of Canada.
Re:And in other news ... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:6000SUX (Score:5, Funny)
On the other hand, here is a shameless insertion of a new joke into the top of the /. heap:
In other news the newly formed state of Montkota is preparing to annex Saskatchewan and secede from the union. George bush has declared all Montkotans "terrorists" and is preparing to invade.
Re:Securing energy independece...until it's gone (Score:2, Funny)
I suggest that you start posting somewhere else on the internet then. This is /. after all.
Another literal reply to a facetious internet post brought to you by T ;-)
Re:We have more oil? (Score:2, Funny)
If they go ahead with the expansion, don't forget the increased water requirements either: if they put a reverse osmosis machine near Whyalla, what's the bet that the waste from it kills all the fishes in Spencer Gulf. bad tims. fish and chips for noone.
Re:6000SUX (Score:4, Funny)
Funny because it's true... (Score:2, Funny)
On the upside, there is no property tax on motor vehicles, and insurance is relatively cheap. Fuel prices are below the national average. Hell, the supermarket sells discounted gasoline if you eat enough. Thank goodness my kids are little eating machines. Every so often, I can fill my BMW with premium for free.
On the downside, there is hyperactive speed enforcement, low speed limits, and the ultimate speed enforcer -- poorly maintained roads.
This place was made for Hummers and I see quite a few on the road every day. If anyone offers an SUV larger than Godzilla, we will set it first in Ohio.
Re:Exactly (Score:2, Funny)
Re:6000SUX (Score:5, Funny)
Re:6000SUX (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Giant shale fields... (Score:3, Funny)
Count me in.
Posting to undo moderation. Selected Insightful rather than Informative
Re:6000SUX (Score:4, Funny)
I wasn't as surprised by the "save a tree" comment by the lady behind the counter as I was with the conversation I had with a 6 year old (rather ghetto looking) while I stood in line. Went something like this:
6yr old: True or False!...Boys wear panties or boxers?
Me:.....Um false.
6yr old: Wrong! My brother wears panties because he says boxers are too manly.
I'm usually pretty quick but I couldn't think of anything to say to that. That was a very interesting day at Wal-mart.