A Fond Look at Some Obsolete Ports 528
StealMyWiFi writes "C-NET.co.uk has a lighthearted look at ten of the best obsolete ports. The biggest surprise is that C-NET claims Firewire is obsolete, which will come as a surprise to the millions of people worldwide who are still using it, especially in light of the story that Firewire is due to get a massive speed boost! The same could be said for their claims about SCSI, although from a consumer point of view I guess that's fairer."
Annoying 'article', here's the list (Score:5, Informative)
1. DB-25 parallel port
2. PS/2
3. FireWire
4. SCSI
5. SCART
6. ISA
7. AGP
8. PCMCIA
9. Kryten's groin (from Red Dwarf)
10. game cartridge port
Last night a Firewire saved my life in a disco (Score:5, Informative)
Re:SCSI isn't what it used to be (Score:5, Informative)
Missing from List (Score:1, Informative)
Re:SCSI? It just changed its face. (Score:5, Informative)
Really isn't. The SATA and SCSI protocols are similar, but there is a real SCSI over serial cable, and it's called SAS (Serial-Attached SCSI). It's the same connectors and cables as SATA, running the real SCSI protocol. The drives are the same good old SCSI drives, costing ten times and much and running ten times as fast as their SATA cousins. It has replaced Ultra-640 SCSI as the system of choice for high-end RAID cages.
Not even close. USB mass storage is almost, but not quite, entirely unlike SCSI.
That one's true though.
Re:Firewire's not obsolete (Score:5, Informative)
Re:SCSI? It just changed its face. (Score:3, Informative)
They support SCSI Primary Command (SPC) Set and SCSI Block Command (SBC) Set. That makes them very much compatible with SCSI
The SATA and SCSI protocols are similar
SAS is a next revision, extension of SCSI - THE new SCSI standard. And SAS supports SATA devices. Meaning that SATA, being a subset of SAS is a subset of nowadays SCSI. Even though SATA protocol is only -similar- to SCSI of the old, it is a part of -current- SCSI standard (SAS).
Re:A few more (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Missing from List (Score:3, Informative)
Re:SCSI? It just changed its face. (Score:3, Informative)
Your logic is fail.
Sega was NOT the first console with a CD drive!!! (Score:2, Informative)
Why does everyone continue to give Sega credit for the CD-Drive on consoles, when the TG(16) did it first!
Re:Seriously, since Sata does SCSI have any benefi (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Firewire's not obsolete (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Last night a Firewire saved my life in a disco (Score:3, Informative)
Re:SCSI? It just changed its face. (Score:5, Informative)
No. It means that they copied a chunk of text out of the SCSI spec because it was as good a way as any. SCSI is a whole lot more than just the parts they copied, and they added some stuff of their own. USB mass storage devices are not compatible with SCSI in any way.
You're thinking of Linux, and that was purely a design decision based on the relative cruftiness of different parts of the kernel. It has nothing to do with the underlying protocol.
No. They have the same connectors and you can build a multi-mode controller that accepts either, but the wire protocol and even line voltages are different. If you plug an SATA drive into a regular SAS controller then it will flag an error and do nothing.
No. SATA is not a subset of SCSI. SATA has features that SCSI does not. SCSI has features that SATA does not. They have very little in common except that the protocols look vaguely similar.
The SATA protocol is specified by SATA-IO. The SCSI protocol is specified by INCITS. They are completely different organisations, and the documents that specify them are entirely separate. The only thing they really have in common is the connectors and cabling.
Please don't just make stuff up. You could have learned all of this from Wikipedia if you had bothered.
Re:SCSI isn't what it used to be (Score:2, Informative)
PCMCIA (Score:2, Informative)
Re:FCC mandate (Score:3, Informative)
Firewire Trumps USB2 (Score:2, Informative)
Re:C-Net (Score:5, Informative)
Serial 9 pin and 15 pin,
CGA Video,
VGA,
ATA Keyboard,
DIP Switches,
Jumpers,
Many Generations of Memory Slots
But what I mess most is Serial and Parallel. It was great easy to make hardware and have it interact with your computer. And most OS's even good old DOS had easy to use ways of accessing the Com Port information. USB often adds an extra level of complexity for home job hardware.
Re:obsolete (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Firewire's not obsolete (Score:2, Informative)
Re:This cracks me up (Score:5, Informative)
regarding Saturday Night Live and its Weekend Update skits:
A frequent feature of Update during this time was Point-Counterpoint, in which Curtin and Aykroyd made vicious and humorously inappropriate ad hominem attacks on each other's positions on a variety of topics, in a parody of the 60 Minutes segment of the same name ...
Aykroyd regularly began his reply with "Jane, you ignorant slut," which became another of the many SNL catch phrases. (Curtin frequently began her reply with, "Dan, you pompous ass".)
there, now i have passed the torch to someone else who will explain this joke to the slash audience in a year or two again...
Re:modem port? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:SCSI isn't what it used to be (Score:5, Informative)
And...I still use good ol' parallel SCSI all the time. Lots of tape drives still use it. I just installed a new server last month with an external LTO drive connected with SCSI.
SCSI is about as far from "obsolete" as you can get when it comes to servers.
Re:C-Net (Score:5, Informative)
ADB is an example of an obsolete connector. Why is this article talking about active, popular ports as being obsolete, or did it travel backwards in time 10 years?
RS232 still kicking strong.... (Score:3, Informative)
Any decent admin has to have at least a half-dozen serial cables and adapters to plug from arbitrary DB9, RJ45, RJ11, Mini-USB, and who knows what else form factors carrying nothing more than the RS232 signals in various random pinouts. Yes, I've even seen a USB form-factor that wasn't used for USB signalling.
Another one: DB15 (Score:4, Informative)
RS
Re:modem port? (Score:2, Informative)
Obsolete does not necessarily mean that it is no longer in use at all. From dictionary.com:
In the case of dial-up modems, they are just no longer in general use given the proliferation of DSL and cable modem service for the majority of the U.S. population.
Re:modem port? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:SCSI isn't what it used to be (Score:4, Informative)
Re:SCSI isn't what it used to be (Score:4, Informative)
SAS has TCQ, SATA has NCQ for command overlapping.
SAS has multipath IO, SATA has port multipliers
SAS cables are rated to 8m, SATA at 1m, hmm an actual difference!
Try to learn something before you start spouting crap.
SAS is available with lower latency drives (15krpm), SATA can easy match it in bandwidth.
Anyone serious uses FC for big arrays anyway, go look at a TPC-C lead benchmark some time.
Re:SCSI isn't what it used to be (Score:3, Informative)
Each doubling of speed on the SCSI cable was sufficiently hard to pull off that cables which were fine for the previous generation simply wouldn't cut it for the new generation, but you can't tell by looking at a cable what speed it was made for.
I think the final SCSI parallel standard didn't even support cables, it was only for backplanes in RAID cabinets.
Well, that's all fixed with SAS. Parallel is just too hard to go forward with.
Re:modem port? (Score:2, Informative)
worth of CNC machine tools, robotic cells, and assembly lines, and all of the equipment
is controlled or updated through DB9 or DB25 serial ports. Yes, the modern stuff comes
with RJ45 (Ethernet) ports. But the serial is always there, and as usually there is one PC
per building controlling all the equipment, it's always the serial that gets used.
Furthermore, all the scanning equipment, and all the heavy duty label printers use
serial ports. Once again, we could buy USB ones, but we do not want to change anything
that we do not have to. So we keep buying RS232 scanners, modems, printers, you name it.
At least two of the plants next to ours are doing the same thing. Manufacturing in the
US is hurting. Changing for the sake of changing is not happening where I can see it.
Re:SCSI? It just changed its face. (Score:3, Informative)
Then your controller is faulty. Part of the SAS specification is that you can plug SATA drives into the controller and they work.
Note that this doesn't work the other way around.
Please don't just make stuff up. You could have learned all of this from Wikipedia if you had bothered.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_ATA#Features [wikipedia.org]
reason why Apple had the different video connector (Score:5, Informative)
The Apple connectors told the computer what kind of resolution and refresh frequency they needed (with simple wiring, no protocol whatsoever), so as usual, the Apples were plug-and-play, whereas the pc's were plug-and-fiddle and then plug-and-pray.
Then NEC invented the multisync monitor, which had as its main purpose to ease the hassles for pc's. This worked very well, the whole industry shifted, and the vga connector became a very useful standard, which was eventually also used by Apple.
Bart
Re:C-Net (Score:3, Informative)
Re:C-Net (Score:3, Informative)
Yes, I use serial printers with work.
Lava's PCI serial cards were at the top of my recommendation list back when they worked with most computers, but now I find a lot of machines (Dell!) won't even boot with them installed.
Digi makes intelligent I/O cards that work quite well up to 19200 but their Linux drivers are incredibly bad and there's a lot of glitches at 38400 and above.