City-Provided Wi-Fi Rejected Over "Health Concerns" 360
exphose writes "A small, hippie-friendly town in northern California, Sebastopol, had made an agreement with Sonic.net to provide free Wi-Fi across the downtown area. However, not everyone in town was pleased with the arrangement. According to Sebastopol Mayor Craig Litwin, citizens had voiced concerns that 'create enough suspicion that there may be a health hazard' and so they canceled their contract with Sonic.net. Some more details are at the blog of Sonic.net's CEO."
More information. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:FM radio? TV? (Score:3, Informative)
Dirty... Worthless... Hippies!
Re:Lay off the weed, man! (Score:3, Informative)
There continue to be links between cell phone use and brain tumors and, though I haven't heard anything recently about power lines, I would not buy a house near high voltage lines.
On the other hand, I think the wireless signals are at a level that they shouldn't be much, if any, issue. I don't hold my computer next to my head and the base station power level just isn't that high - nor is it mounted right next to my bed.
But there are some signals that there is enough evidence of harm that people ought to be careful.
Teach her some physics. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Lay off the weed, man! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Lay off the weed, man! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:FM radio? TV? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Lay off the weed, man! (Score:3, Informative)
But mysteriously this does't help against the cellphone radiation.
Of course. It affects us in the same way as a campfire does: local heating. A microwave oven with the same effect as a wifi antenna or a cellphone could hardly heat up anything at all.
Re:comment from a contrarian (Score:4, Informative)
The one saving grace of asbestos is that if you leave it alone, it'll leave you alone. The real problems kick in when you start prying it loose and moving it around.
Hugely useful [mayoclinic.com] but only when used within strict guidelines. As it turns out, one of its potential uses turned out to be a pretty bad idea so we don't use it that way anymore.
I'll give you that one.
The FDA insists that it is [fda.gov]. Sure, it's possible that they're a wholly owned subsidiary of Searle or whoever else makes the stuff these days, but I still trust the FDA at least as much as the groups opposing it.
My wife's a doctor. She has patients who beg her to find old expired samples or any other source of the stuff she might know of. Those patients know that it possibly cause them harm, but it's so effective that they're willing to take that risk. If you have rheumatoid arthritis, would you rather have 50 years of crippling agony before you or 25 years of painfree enjoyment? Regardless of your answer, a lot of people wish they could pick the latter but that's no longer available to them.
I begrudge them acting to make it impossible for me to use whatever it is they're afraid of this week.
Re:Lay off the weed, man! (Score:1, Informative)
You misspelled "anthropogenic".
Re:Lay off the weed, man! (Score:4, Informative)