Google a "Happy Loser" In Spectrum Auction 162
Large cell service providers won almost all of the licenses in the recently concluded FCC spectrum auction. Google didn't get any and won't be entering the wireless business. Verizon Wireless was the big winner, laying out $9.4 billion for enough regional licenses in the "C" block to stitch together nationwide coverage, except for Alaska. On this spectrum Verizon will have to allow subscribers to use any compatible wireless device and run any software application they want. AT&T paid $6.6 billion, Qualcomm picked up a few licenses, and Paul Allen's Vulcan Spectrum LLC won a pair of licenses in the "A" block. One analyst called Google a "happy loser" because it got the openness it had pushed for. The AP's coverage does some more of the numbers.
Conspiracy Theory (Score:4, Insightful)
And, after all, you've already signed a two-year contract for "unlimited" talk at $100/month. Why would they want to upset that gravy train? It's not like any of the other carriers can use it...
Re:Call me ignorant (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Conspiracy Theory (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't believe there is a requirement they have to use it for phone service though.
Google DID win (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Android (Score:3, Insightful)
I think it's pretty slimy that verizon does things like disable USB on devices in order to force users to transfer their pictures over their pay-per-transfer type service. Don't let them get you with lockin. Bring your own device (byod) and pick the national or regional carrier that suites your usage pattern best.
AT&T kicked Verizon's butt (Score:5, Insightful)
And there are no open network requirements on AT&T's spectrum.
Sounds like AT&T came out on top of this deal.
Re:Android (Score:5, Insightful)
yuck (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Android (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Android (Score:5, Insightful)
Also, if it weren't for a company trying to "circumvent" monopoly regulations, there would never have been a "Berkley Standard Distribution." So I suppose sometimes good can come from their "evil" ways.
Re:Android (Score:4, Insightful)
Corporate Culture (Score:5, Insightful)
While I understand your point and agree with to a certain point, my experience has been that corporations or their divisions or other business entities develop a corporate culture that is more than the sum of its parts. Individually, the people in it can be quite nice away from the office, but when they are in the workplace, they become part of the entity. A couple I have seen (and thank all gods never worked for) were run like Nazi concentration camps. They hated everybody, and the places were run on total fear. More commonly, you do see businesses that have a culture of looking at their customers as victims to be abused. You can go to work in such a place as the nicest guy in the world, but if you stay long enough, the hive mind will take you over, and you'll start abusing grandmothers. Fortunately, most of us will quit such a place before we're too badly damaged.
Re:yuck (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Android (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Corporate Culture (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Android (Score:2, Insightful)
Businesses that hate their customers (Score:2, Insightful)
Good: How can we provide our customers with the best possible service, and at the same time make a buck?
Evil: How can we change our service to make customers pay us more money?
Of course, business is about making money, the difference is just that the "good" business believe that the long term key to making money is customer satisfaction, while the "evil" business is more concerned about short term optimization.
A personal example: My current ISP has a convenient on-line facility to switch to a more expensive / higher bandwidth subscription, but you can't use it to switch to cheaper / lower bandwidth subscription. The main competitor allows you to switch both ways. One of the two "hates" their customers. I chose the competitor when I had to connect some family members to the net. I'm sure I would be more inclined to upgrade my own connection, if I know it was easy to downgrade again. Now, I'm more likely to switch provider.
Treating your customers with respect is good for your customer, and it is good for you in the long term. It creates trust and loyalty.
BTW: When Google say "do no Evil" I'm sure it is in this sense, not in the sense of supporting Tibet monks against an oppressive regime. Allowing pop3 access to gmail is a good example of this, it circumvent their source of income, but makes more people inclined to try them out, and they rely on their own interface being good enough to win you over. [ And of course, access to confidential information your mail will help them in their evil plans of world domination, but that is another story. ]
Re:Does Open = Without charges? (Score:3, Insightful)