Hobbyists Create GPLed DIY Super TV Antenna 185
Freshly Exhumed writes "Retired and hobbyist antenna engineers working together in the Digital Home forums have taken an obscure 1950s UHF TV antenna called the Hoverman [PDF] and subjected the design to modern software-based computer modeling in hopes of optimizing its middling performance. The result: the new Gray-Hoverman antenna is more powerful than similar commercially manufactured consumer antennas in every category, sometimes by whopping amounts. Best thing yet: they've released the design, diagrams, and schematics under the GPLv3 so that we can roll our own! Quoth one of the testers, a former U.S. Government antenna engineer: 'Boy, this antenna is hot... This antenna is a vast, and I mean REALLY VAST improvement over anything I have used.' The home thread of the Gray-Hoverman development gives the background of their great work."
Re:How is this different than what hams have done? (Score:5, Insightful)
The second and more important achievement is that the designers tried to verify the design of this antenna analytically using relatively new methods. The computational power needed to do this didn't emerge until after this kind of small antenna was no longer in vogue. As you probably know, about half of what hams say about antennas and interference is "black magic." The kind of hands-on techie who turns into a ham tends to be more like MacGuyver and less like Bertrand Russell.
Why would the existence of antenna design as a discipline imply that no new designs are possible?
For non DIYers (Score:3, Insightful)
The Hoverman-Gray is described as "GPLed". If that's the only legal protection it has, then I predict a lot of cheap knockoffs that don't work very well. Some trademark protection (with free licenses for anybody who agrees to follow the spec) would be nice.
Re:on that topic... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:on that topic... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:The article (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Antennas rule (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:The article (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:on that topic... (Score:2, Insightful)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atsc [wikipedia.org]
"ATSC Standards document a digital television format which will replace (in the United States) the analog NTSC television system by February 17, 2009."
Re:on that topic... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:For non DIYers (Score:3, Insightful)
GPL protects the plans. It doesn't stop me from selling old coathangers and calling them "Gray-Hoverman antennas." For that, you need trademark protection.
Re:Antennas rule (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:For non DIYers (Score:3, Insightful)
As they aren't trying to sell the antenna, its plans or the knowledge, I don't know if trademarks would do any good. Even if trademarks are enforced, does it really matter? People see "TV antenna" on the box and that's all they need to know. Heck, I didn't know there were proper names for specific antenna shapes until I got interested in playing with WiFi antennas. The general public is quite likely much farther down the scale. The TV antenna boxes I've seen don't generally use the proper names of the antenna type.
Re:on that topic... (Score:3, Insightful)
With that said, I'd suggest a good usenet service - avoid giganews - and a usenet tracker like newzbin.com. You can even SSL usenet nowadays. Safer, easier, and pretty darn easy. Of course, this is
Re:Next up: The open source buggy whip! (Score:4, Insightful)
Actually, I've noticed exactly the opposite.
* Many more homes will be able to receive an OTA signal, that previously could not.
* Digital broadcasts will offer perfect reception, eliminating much of the need for cable/sat.
* OTA HDTV will offer the highest quality picture anyone can get.
* OTA ATSC offers the potential for more TV channels than an expensive subscription service (50*6 = 300), in addition to other informational services.
* Rising prices and horrendous support will push people away from cable/satellite.
* Proprietary STBs and feet-dragging on CableCard will push even more people away from cable/sat.
* DVR technology will eliminate the need for syndication, and there the business model for 90% of cable/satellite networks will fail.
* The quality of original programming on cable/satellite networks has dropped SEVERELY, anyhow.
* Pop-up ads on cable/sat networks (largely not found on broadcast) will push even more people away.