MSI Develops a Heat-Driven Cooler 173
V!NCENT tips us to a write-up about an addition to MSI's Ecolution motherboard which harvests heat from the chipset to power a fan. The device is based on a Stirling engine. The heat from the chipset expands a trapped gas, which pushes against a piston to generate power. The article contains a YouTube video of how the device works. According to MSI, the device has 70% efficiency.
Headline misleading (Score:0, Insightful)
Re:Please define efficiency for me (Score:3, Insightful)
Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
That makes the assumption that you can't do both. Why wouldn't you be able to do both?
Re:Please define efficiency for me (Score:5, Insightful)
I suspect 70% efficiency means they can reach 70% of the theoretical limit maximum at these temperatures. The theoretical limit for heat reservoirs of 55C and 25C is about 10% http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnot_heat_engine#Carnot.27s_theorem [wikipedia.org].
So really this fan can convert up to 7% of the waste heat. This doesn't sound very impressive, but as long as it provides a little bit of convection it'll be better than passive cooling.
But the winner is... (Score:5, Insightful)
tension to the apparatus you see through your peekaboo case.
Still, it's a bit of a clunker compared to the old-tech way of
making a no-moving-parts air pump powered by waste
heat. I refer, of course, to the 'chimney'.
Re:Headline misleading (Score:5, Insightful)
Typical "air conditioner" situation: you want to make the inside of a room cooler than the outside temperature.
Since the room starts out similar in temp to the outside, you have to spend energy pushing heat "uphill" to
an increasingly warmer outside. Making heat flow against the direction it would normally flow,
that's a cooler in the thermodynamic sense.
In the CPU situation, you want to make the inside of the cpu EQUAL to the outside temperature.
Since the running CPU starts out way warmer than the outside temp, the heat will flow naturally on it's
own "downhill" to the outside. Any sort of cooling system merely hastens the flow.
In this situation, any device like a fan, etc is merely a more efficient radiator...
as the temp of cpu gets closer to the outside, this device loses efficiency... and in no case
could it get the cpu any _colder_ than the outside.
Being able to do that is what makes something a "cooler" in the physics sense.
Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
Maybe just because it's cool - in more ways than one.
Re:Headline misleading (Score:5, Insightful)
The rest of what you say is mostly true[*], but just because a term has a specific meaning in a specific context does not mean it's wrong when it has a different meaning in a different context. In both cases, the chip is cooled, making them a cooler, i.e., something that cools.
[*] I say "mostly true" because even in an air conditioner, the heat is "flowing downhill", as it were. The difference is that is the "bottom of the hill" is being manipulated through changes in pressure (or more generally, through work)--essentially by also raising the "top of the hill". In both cases, the net temperature is being raised (in compliance with the laws of thermodynamics).
Additionally, I wonder if you are confusing the terms "cooler" and "heat pump". Is a "cooler" something distinct from a "heat pump" in a "physics or thermodynamics" sense? I'm thinking the former is merely an informal term for the latter.
Re:Good thing it is 70% efficient (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why? (Score:3, Insightful)
Just saying.
Re:Why? (Score:1, Insightful)
Really? It would seem to me any "sucked up heat" would be returned in friction. Or is energy lost in this system?