Knee Brace Generates Electricity From Walking 128
ktulus cry brings news of a device that can power portable gadgets, prosthetic joints, and other mobile appliances by harvesting energy generated by walking. Researchers are working on making the device — still a moderately cumbersome 3.5 pounds — smaller while maintaining its energy harvesting capacity. CNet has a write-up with more pictures and a diagram of the device.
"In the mode in which the brace is only activated while the knee is braking, the subjects required less than one watt of extra metabolic power for each watt of electricity they generated. A typical hand-crank generator, for comparison, takes an average of 6.4 watts of metabolic power to generate one watt of electricity because of inefficiencies of muscles and generators. A lighter version would be helpful to hikers or soldiers who don't have easy access to electricity. And the scientists say similar mechanisms could be built into prosthetic knees other implantable devices such as pacemakers or neurotransmitters that today require a battery, and periodic surgery to replace that battery."
Re:less than one watt for one watt? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:less than one watt for one watt? (Score:2, Informative)
they had a bit about this on NPR (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Considering the the potential energy stores in. (Score:5, Informative)
A study in Holland [plosjournals.org] disagrees about the savings from obesity reduction:
Re:Perpetuum mobile? (Score:5, Informative)
In the mode in which the brace is only activated while the knee is braking, the subjects required less than one watt of extra metabolic power for each watt of electricity they generated.(emphasis mine)
That means that the system captures some of the energy that would normally be "wasted" and converts it into electricity instead....
Re:Lots of applications ... (Score:2, Informative)
(In the US Army, at least, "sir" is reserved for male officers and warrant officers.)
Re:Exercise Power Plants (Score:3, Informative)
A really well-tuned automobile engine, running on pre-refined fuel, might get 40% thermal efficiency or so. The human body, of course, starts with rather unrefined fuel (food, to the non-techie
A full-cycle efficiency of the 33% or so (assuming your 2:1 ratio of waste heat to output) seems very good. Almost all the fuel conversion techniques we have (oil refining, fermentation to convert the stuff we eat to ethanol, coal gasification, etc.) lose more than this, I suspect.
Re:Perpetuum mobile? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:less than one watt for one watt? (Score:4, Informative)
Audio interview about the "Energy Brace" from CBC (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.cbc.ca/quirks/archives/07-08/feb09.html [www.cbc.ca]
The Interview (in OGG & MP3 formats) :
http://www.cbc.ca/quirks/media/2007-2008/ogg/qq-2008-02-09_01.ogg [www.cbc.ca]
http://www.cbc.ca/quirks/media/2007-2008/mp3/qq-2008-02-09_01.mp3 [www.cbc.ca]
Re:less than one watt for one watt? (Score:2, Informative)