Hard Drive Imports to be Banned? 391
Arathon writes "Apparently the International Trade Commission is beginning an investigation that could lead to the banning of hard drive imports from Western Digital, Seagate, and Toshiba, among others, on the grounds that they fundamentally violate patents held by Steven and Mary Reiber of California. The patent apparently has to do with "dissipative ceramic bonding tips", which are important components of the drives themselves.
Obviously, a ban would be unthinkable, and yet the ITC has 45 days to settle on a fixed date for the end of the investigation. If the patents are found to be violated, and the Reibers do not allow those patents to be bought or otherwise dealt with, the importation of almost all hard drives would actually be ceased."
injunctions aren't required (Score:5, Informative)
Re:useful arts (Score:5, Informative)
Anyone know when hard drive manufacturers started (Score:5, Informative)
Dissipative ceramic bonding tool tip
Inventors: Reiber; Steven Frederick (Rocklin, CA), Reiber; Mary Louise (Linclon, CA)
Appl. No.: 10/036,579
Filed: December 31, 2001
Dissipative ceramic bonding tool tip
Inventors: Reiber; Steven-Frederick (Rocklin, CA), Reiber; Mary Louise (Lincoln, CA)
Appl. No.: 10/650,169
Filed: August 27, 2003
Re:injunctions aren't required (Score:5, Informative)
This is an ITC action, not a patent infringement suit. The rules are very different and pretty corrupt.
Back in the 1980s when the US feared it was losing its edge a series of bills was passed to create non-tariff barriers to high tech trade. At the time the US HI-tech companies were complaining that their ideas were being stolen. So they created a kangeroo-court process to allow US companies to block competing imports.
Of course this started long before the effects of Reagans gutting of the USPTO review process were beginning to be realized. At the time a patent actually meant something.
Regardless the drive manufacturers will settle. Just think of it as a private tax.
Re:Anyone know when hard drive manufacturers start (Score:3, Informative)
Re:useful arts (Score:3, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright_brothers [wikipedia.org]
Re:But do prohibitive prices promote progress? (Score:5, Informative)
Your reasoning is an example of the fallacy of the broken window. [wikipedia.org]
This is not good for `science', because in the absence of the patent issue companies would be free to direct their R&D to whatever technology they wanted, rather than solving an already-solved problem.
Don't Panic (Score:2, Informative)
There are still several Hard Drive factories left in the US. In fact, my hometown has a very large one (Hitachi). Even if Imports are banned, we will still have domestic production. Since every hard drive manufacturer on the planet was not listed in the suit, I can only assume the companies not listed are not violating the patent.
Re:useful arts (Score:4, Informative)
I would not be surprised if they know exactly what a medication can cover, but choose to only advertise it for one purpose till the patent is about to expire, then miraculously find a new problem to solve and get the patent extended...
Re:useful arts (Score:2, Informative)
The patent has no relation to hard drives at all. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:useful arts (Score:2, Informative)
Yes because it is so much better to sink piles of money into R&D only to have some patent troll extort all of your profits because he bought a decade old patent for $100 that reads like "doing something cool using a COMPUTER!"
There, I slashdot-ized that for you.
Re:The patent has no relation to hard drives at al (Score:1, Informative)
You bet they know how those die are bonded. That's a VERY important aspect of parts reliability, and no hard disk mfr making millions of widgets is going to be cavalier about the parts they use to the point of considering them as commodity jellybeans.
If for no other reason than it's likely that those chips are actually the drive mfrs intellectual property (i.e. custom ASICs).
Sure, the casual low volume user of parts as commodity items (like your kits) isn't going to care, but someone buying them by the million, and concerned about yield, certainly does.
Re:useful arts (Score:3, Informative)
The Wright brothers certainly did not "invent" the aeroplane, and I don't think that they would have claimed to have invented it either. What they did, that no-one before them had done, was make the aeroplane a practical device. The Wright's concept of "3 axis control", and its practical implementation, was a huge step forward in aviation and the Flyers benefited from it.
It's not that the Wrights were the first in flight, it's that they were the first in manned, powered, _controlled_ flight. Even Gustave Whitehead's machine, which by most accounts did fly under its own power with a man on board, was not fully controlled. Roll was dependent on the pilot throwing his body around and yaw was only crudely controlled by varying the speeds of the twin propellers. The Wright system of wing warping to control roll, with a coordinated rudder to control yaw, and a movable aileron to control pitch was revolutionary at the time.
Re:useful arts (Score:3, Informative)
So, their innovation was the predecessor to modern flight control surfaces. It wasn't exactly what we use now. Wing warping has been replaced by elevators and ailerons. But it is the same basic principal of operation.