Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display 466
longacre writes "Popular Mechanics takes the Microsoft Surface system for a hands-on video test drive. To be announced at today's D5 conference, the coffee-table-esqe device allows manipulation from multiple touch points, while infrared, WiFi and Bluetooth team up to allow wireless transfers between devices placed on top of it, such as cameras and cell phones. Expected to launch before the end of the year in the $5,000-$10,000 range, the devices might not make their way under many Christmas trees, but will find the insides of Starwood hotels, Harrah's casinos and T-Mobile shops."
Similar tech (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Similar tech (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Similar tech (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Similar tech (Score:5, Informative)
There ya go.
And there was yet another that allowed you to mix music and create synthesized effects in real time by arranging various oddly-shaped prisms on the surface. I have two (large) videos of that but I don't know where they came from.
Re:Kudos (Score:5, Informative)
Conception (Score:5, Informative)
But like rearing a child, we'll see the person in 5 to seven years... Or, in a month when the iPhone is released.
Re:Similar tech (Score:2, Informative)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp-y3ZNaCqs [youtube.com]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yHB40jeTOw [youtube.com]
Re:Credit where due department (Yeah To Jeff Han) (Score:5, Informative)
Check out the Jeff Han video from last year then watch the MS video.. The original is a much smoother interface.
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/65 [ted.com]
Yeah MS added some fluff by making it interact with devices placed on top the the basic idea is not some new "Top Secret" project
Hisory of Multitouch Interface (Score:2, Informative)
Reactable (Score:2, Informative)
You seem to be thinking of Reactable [upf.edu]. The main difference is that Reactable uses a camera and fiducial symbols. Reactable is really a great and low-cost system, which works fairly well (just sketching one of the symbols with marker got it recognizable). They've segregated the optical processing and the application layer very well from what I could tell, which should lead to clean and easy apps.
MS appears to be using a combination, as the guy showed some optical symbols on the bottom of objects as well.
Tron? (Score:5, Informative)
Granted it only displayed VT-100, but it was still the first example I remember of a useful PC built into the furniture.
(yes, those old coctail arcade machines were cool (especially tennis) but I don't consider them a "PC")
Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul (Score:4, Informative)
Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Other Articles (Score:2, Informative)
Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.apple.com/iphone/technology/ [apple.com]
Re:Credit where due department (Score:3, Informative)
Exactly. Everyone should go read The Myths Of Innovation [oreilly.com] (O'Reilly) before making comments about innovation.
Re:Kudos (Score:5, Informative)
Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display (Score:3, Informative)
MS' interactive displays use near IR, not thermal IR. Probably because:
1 - NIR gear is incredibly cheap, whereas thermal IR gear is still very pricey.
2 - There are lots of materials that are transparent to NIR but translucent to visible light. Their displays have a NIR camera and an NIR LED array in addition to the video projector behind the projection surface, which the NIR light passes through in both directions. The user sees the visible light on the projection surface, and the system sees the user. AFAIK material that would work like that for thermal IR is more exotic.
Anyway, coffee would probably look transparent enough to the camera to not register a hit. But even if it did, the video shows little CGI bubbles moving away from the cup set on the table, so I'm sure they've thought of this kind of thing.
Re:Credit where due department (Score:3, Informative)
TED [ted.com], where I first saw the photo enlarging/spinningidea shown, isn't an obscure venue. The idea of putting objects on a touch surface and having them interact I believe was Reactable's [youtube.com] The Reactable interface showed up at a Bjork concert. Again, not an obscure venue.
What tweaks a lot of people isn't that ideas evolve but that Microsoft gloms onto them and then claims they came up with the idea and patent it. Microsoft deserves credit for bringing the ideas to market in a different guise but not for innovating.
A little more background (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Better applications (Score:1, Informative)