Affordable DX10 - GeForce 8600 GTS and 8600 GT 224
mikemuch writes "While ATI still hasn't released a DX-10-capable graphics card, Nvidia today already released its affordable SKUs, in descending price and performance order the GeForce 8600 GTS and GeForce 8600 GT, and 8500 GT. The GTS costs $200-230, the GT from $150-170, and the 8500 reaching down to the $90 range. The architecture for the new GPUs is the same as for the 8800 line, but with lower clocks and fewer stream processors."
too many models and lines (Score:5, Insightful)
Are these faster than my 7800GS? Would they be faster than a 7800GT? Who can fucking tell?
Re:Yay! DX10! (Score:3, Insightful)
Don't care (Score:3, Insightful)
not objective (Score:1, Insightful)
Please. This is all bull.
Re:Don't care (Score:1, Insightful)
What if Microsoft held a war... and nobody came?
This is pretty hilarious shit. Obviously no one gives a shit about Vista, or there'd be tons of DX10 hardware with working drivers already. It's clear that no one with lots of money is beating anyone up about this.
It's a *product*, not a SKU (Score:5, Insightful)
So how much did NVidia pay them for this? (Score:4, Insightful)
Yet their final page says you should buy the NVidia rather than the X1950?
Somebody's been paid off. This wasn't an article, it's a fucking stealth ad. They have no integrity.
Let me get this straight. (Score:2, Insightful)
The biggest reason to get these cards over other existing ones is for DirectX 10.
The drivers for these cards don't work under Vista.
Huh.
old $150 x1950 pro outdoes new $200 8600 gts (Score:4, Insightful)
It seems nice of Nvidia to leave ATI/AMD a chance to beat them squarely in the $200 bracket by showing up with more memory bandwidth.
8600 is ok but hardly anything to get excited about. More about features than performance or bang/buck.
Re:It's a *product*, not a SKU (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes, it's a Stock Keeping Unit. When a manager wants to talk about the variety on his shelf, he talks about the number of SKUs on it. Each SKU is a different item in the computer, but may be VERY close to another product in actuality. Yellow Rubberbands vs Red Rubberbands, for instance.
Like it or not, sometimes the real world carries over into our little tech paradise and we have to understand their terms. Even worse, sometimes we start using them ourselves! Oh noes!
Re:Yay! DX10! (Score:4, Insightful)
Pot & Kettle (Score:5, Insightful)
And while Nvidia still hasn't released working Vista drivers...
I would Mod the article submitter Troll -1 over the wording in this article.
Re:too many models and lines (Score:2, Insightful)
But the x1950 still isn't DX 10... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:ATi ain't far behind (Score:2, Insightful)
yay abuse of moderation (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Let me get this straight. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:yay abuse of moderation (Score:1, Insightful)
I agree, your post was not a troll. There is no surge of upgrades to Vista, and it seems like it will enter people's homes and businesses when they would get a new computer anyway. The Wow campaign failed, in other words.
Posting anonymously, since posting "I agree"-type replies to posts moderated as Troll will sometimes render the reply with a Troll moderation too, and I don't want to take the karma hit.
Re:too many models and lines (Score:1, Insightful)
For example, you don't want to be stuck buying a $1004.00 Pentium-D Extreme Edition processor http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?P
when a $180 Core2 Duo can easily beat the snot out of it.
Re:yay abuse of moderation (Score:3, Insightful)
I am in contact with a good portion of the local dealers of computer hard- and software. The general consensus is that people do anything but break down their doors for Vista. If they buy it, it's usually bought with a new computer. Actually the campaign did more ill than good. It made it very "uncool" to go Vista, 'cause such a huge hype has been created around it while the reports are pretty bland. The hefty price tag and not being able to "try" it before buying it (ya know, the "trials" that you get from
Generally, there are 4 groups of people who could buy it:
First, the companies. They get whatever their contractor supplies, and they generally get computers with system, not when the system comes out (far from it, they need finished systems not bananaware) but when the life cycle dictates it.
Then the clueless users. They, too, get their system with the hardware. Preinstalled. Because it's simpler, easier and less hassle. I know people who still run 98 because they upgrade every 7 years or so and back then their system came with 98, so why bother buying something else? It "works"...
Then, the wannabe gurus. The people who buy whatever is "hip". Well, Vista could have fit that demographics, but the marketing blew it. Big time. Vista is anything but "hip".
And finally the people with a clue. They'd buy it if it offered any measurable benefit. But it doesn't. Aero is fluff. The added security isn't secure. The promised file system didn't make it. What's left?
There's already a joke circulating how to upgrade to Vista for free:
1. Download a window manager that mimics Aero (optional).
2. Remove half your ram.
3. Clock your CPU down a few notches.
Sadly, it's not that far from reality.
Re:So how much did NVidia pay them for this? (Score:2, Insightful)
Of course the DX10 technology affects cost, but either way it would be more fair comparison if the cards around the same price point were compared as it would show how much DX9 performance you are sacrificing to have DX10 hardware. As these cards are on the cast of affordable gamer cards, the bang-per-buck performance is what most gamers want to know.
Also comparison against the 8800 GTS card would've been helpful as the 8800 GTS has attained the $300 price point.
Tom's hardware has IMHO better review about these cards. I would suggest that everyone interested about these cards check that review also.
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/04/17/geforce_86