Samsung's 64-GB Solid-State Drive 249
Anonymous Howard writes "Just a couple of weeks ago Sandisk introduced a 32-GB solid-state drive. Now Samsung has one-upped them, unveiling a 64-GB solid-state drive. They are expecting to begin shipping in the second quarter of this year. Samsung says the device can read 64 MB/s, write 45 MB/s, and uses just 0.5 W when operating (0.1 W when idle). In comparison, an 80-GB 1.8-inch hard drive reads at 15 MB/s, writes at 7 MB/s, and consumes 1.5 W when either operating or idle. No pricing yet."
finally, one big enough for regular use (Score:4, Insightful)
Seriously, though, that's enough for windows XP/Vista/etc. plus your favorite games, apps, and so on. Maybe you couldn't put whole slews of videos or images on there, but you could always get 2 of them.
Re:finally, one big enough for regular use (Score:5, Insightful)
Performance? (Score:4, Insightful)
Can anyone find some more details on the transfer rate/seek time?
For a hard disk peak transfer rate is when reading consecutive blocks... if the solid state drive can get near peak performance for random access, it's got a huge advantage.
And is thus very cool.
What's the long-term stability? (Score:5, Insightful)
They also have error detection/correction, bad-sector remapping, and "I'm about to die" notification.
At one time, solid-state devices were good for about a thousand writes for any given memory cell, a lot fewer than HDs.
Does anyone know the reliability for these new solid-state devices over wall time, hours in use/plugged in, number of read cycles, and number of write cycles under normal operating conditions, and how those compare with a modern 1.8, 2.5, or 3.5" drive?
From my vantage point (Score:4, Insightful)
The price may or not go down enough within that time period to kick out harddrives completely - in which case we'll just see hybrid drives take over.
Seek time? Should be 0ms (Score:5, Insightful)
I would spend serious money for a laptop drive (Score:5, Insightful)
Personally, to pull the SATA drive out of my laptop and replace it with a 100gb version of this that used so much less power and was so much faster would be a no-brainer even at something like 700 or 800 dollars (US). Battery life would be radically better, noise and heat would be much lower, performance better and general usability should be outstanding.
What are the downsides? How is the duty cycle on these things? Will they last as long or develop hotspots that can't store data as well?
Industrial PC's (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Smaller isn't better... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Heat and Noise? (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, based on an energy consumption of 0.5W and an educated guess that they probably aren't emitting much light, I'd say that the heat output is 0.5W.
Duh.
Re:Industrial PC's (Score:2, Insightful)
$$$
For a long while I think you'll see more hybrids, and more use of a solid state drive to accelerate application loading, while platter based discs hold the mountains of "data".
Other than application loading, there isn't too much use for these on personal PCs. They'd improve the hell out of database server performance, though.
Re:Industrial PC's (Score:3, Insightful)
I think that the SSD is going to compete far sooner than most people realize. Looking at the numbers, we now see that laptops are almost outselling stationary computers, so people may actually turn to SSD as soon as 2.5 inchers at 200 GB come at competitive prices. Besides, if you want lots of space for vids and mp3s, then why not get a networked server with a couple of TB of space, or at least some external drives mounted to a laptop slot-in?
Re:Put pagefile somewhere else? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Put pagefile somewhere else? (Score:3, Insightful)
That sentence should have ended right after "without a backup".
No pricing yet (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Industrial PC's (Score:3, Insightful)