Recovering a Wrecked RAID 175
Dr. Eggman writes "Tom's Hardware recently posted an article specifying how the professionals at Kroll Ontrack recover data from a RAID array that has suffered a hard drive failure, allowing for recovery of even RAID 5 arrays suffering two failures. The article is quick to warn this is costly, however, and points out the different types of hard drive failures that occur, only some of which are repairable. Ultimately the article concludes that consistent backups and other good practices are the best solution. Still, it provides an interesting look into the world of data after death."
Re:RAID5. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:FOR THE LAST FREAKIN' TIME... (Score:5, Informative)
When a disk fails in a RAID, it needs to be replaced IMMEDIATELY. A RAID system with a failed disk is a disaster waiting to happen. I've been in smaller shops that don't even have spare disks around. When a disk failed, they would order a disk at that point and have it shipped.
You should always have plenty of spare disks around, and you should replace disks as soon as they fail. A double disk failure is rare, but the longer you put off replacing a failed disk, the more likely it becomes.
Could have mentioned other options (Score:2, Informative)
Re:RAID5. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Backing up HDDs is very hard (Score:4, Informative)
Cheap Solution (Score:2, Informative)
sorry, that's wrong... (Score:2, Informative)
http://storagemojo.com/?p=383 [storagemojo.com]
Short synopsis for those who don't want to read it: The rebuild process is intense enough to cause secondary failures in many more cases than you'd think. Because you haven't seen it yet is not indicative of the overall population, and sysadmins are payed to be prepared.
The rest of your post is arguable, but it's more a matter of opinion and practice than anything else.
Re:RAID5. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:IntelliTXT too (Score:3, Informative)
Truly astonishing...but so simple (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Newbie Question... (Score:3, Informative)
If you use a reputable controller (i.e. one that costs more than your entire motherboard), it will read the configuration off the disks instead of overwriting them.
RAID5 is good, not flawless (Score:3, Informative)
Data integrity and uptime are served by RAID5. If it's not good enough, then it should be backed with mirroring (RAID5+0) or some form of dual-parity RAID (RAID-DP from NetApp, etc.).
But data gets lost or corrupted, even without disk failures. Backups are the place where data recovery is done. DO YOUR BACKUPS!