Toshiba Touts 51GB HD DVD 236
srizah writes to mention that Toshiba plans to launch a 51 GB HD DVD, with a 1 GB advantage over Sony's Blu-ray disc. From the article: Toshiba has submitted a triple-layer, 51GB HD DVD-ROM disc to the standard's overseer in the hope the technology will be adopted as a standard by the end of the year. If approved, it allow the format to exceed the 50GB storage capacity of rival medium Blu-ray Disc. The HD DVD standard currently defines single- and dual-layer discs capable of holding 15GB and 30GB of data, respectively."
Finally? (Score:1, Insightful)
No way (Score:2, Insightful)
The previously capacity-challenged HD-DVD grows larger than its Blue-Ray rival, therefore eliminating the last remaining advantage or BR and more or less killing it in the short-to-medium term... Along with the PS3.
This just after HD-DVD encryption was broken? I have to get my tinfoil hat.
Re:Finally? (Score:2, Insightful)
Not a big deal... (Score:5, Insightful)
They are making it more and more complicated (Score:5, Insightful)
Now you have to check that:
- You are using the right disk with the right recorder BlueRay/HD-DVD
- You are using the right variety of disk that you recorder can read (triple layer won't work on old players).
- You have everything hooked using HDCP cabling.
- All of your hardware supports DRM (if it doesn't your content will be downgraded and you will be worst off than you would with a dvd player).
And off course, the way things are going, in no time your new shiny expensive hardware will be rendered obsolete by a new iteration of the technology and/or the Digital Restrictions Management schema imposed by the studios.
You have to be masochistic to refuse the easy route to High Definition, a DVI connector, P2P and a BFHD (Big F*****g Hard Drive).
Re:Finally? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Finally? (Score:1, Insightful)
One can't help but wonder how much Sony's previous Betamax failure will influence the outcome of this format war. More likely, the fact that the disks themselves are generally cheaper than blu-ray already signals a tipping to HD-DVD.
200GB 51GB (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:The spec can't be changed now (Score:2, Insightful)
I suspect that future players will be backwards compatible with the new format.
Re:Finally? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:The spec can't be changed now (Score:3, Insightful)
Technically, no.
Think about it for a moment. Look at all the HD-DVDs on the market, and HD-DVD players. They're missing something. Something that has annoyed the world over (not so much North America, but the rest of the world). Blu-Ray has it alright (they've simplified it - somewhat, but it's still present).
The "feature" that's missing in HD-DVD? Region coding. Yes, HD-DVDs are region-free. HD-DVD players have region numbers alright - that's for the DVD playback. HD-DVDs, nope. HD-DVD flippers, yes, for the DVD side. Now how in the world is the content industry going to accept that a major "next-gen" format will allow someone in Europe to get a high-quality movie that's probably just playing in theatres?
The other thing is well, HD-DVD supports managed copy, which I don't think is quite standardized yet (managed copies is a DRM way of letting you take your HD-DVD, copy it to your hard drive to play on your laptop, or move it to an iPod to play, or other thing).
Anyhow, it's not like more layers can't be put into the spec - I believe there is future capability for 4 layer HD-DVDs. 2 layers was put into the spec because it's trivial to produce using existing DVD processes (HD-DVD's main strength is how one can recycle existing DVD plants to make HD-DVDs - basically very little is needed to upgrade it from DVD-only to DVD-and-HD-DVD. Hence all the DVD/HD-DVD flippers out there - it's no biggie to the production line).
Re:Finally? (Score:3, Insightful)
Dual format is better than nothing, but I'd rather have a "winner." I know that every one of my VHS tapes is going to work in just about every VCR you can find in a home.
Of course it's even better if we don't have a fight at all, like with CD, but I guess it's a little late for that at this point?
TW
It's about production sizes, not disc sizes (Score:3, Insightful)
We'll just have to wait and see how long it takes before these discs become reasonable to manufacturer. Until then, I'm sticking to DVD.
Re:hey guys, help me make a decision (Score:3, Insightful)
No need to do that anymore (Score:3, Insightful)
1. It's cheaper to produce
2. There's porn on it
3. Higher capacities don't matter for H.264/VC-1 encoded content
These map very closely to VHS vs Betamax war:
1. VHS was cheaper to product
2. There was porn on it
3. Higher image quality didn't matter much
Except #3 is not even about image quality this time around. Image quality is identical between two standards, they use the same codecs at the same bitrates.
Re:the winnar is pr0n (Score:3, Insightful)
Right at this second, I don't care either way since I don't have either player yet (though I'm leaning towards HD DVD based on the price factor and the fact that there is more content available on HD DVD right now). However, when people claim superiority of one format over the other on anything besides the technical merits, it should be based on facts as opposed to statements of intent.