Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Data Storage Patents Entertainment Hardware

China Readies Royalty-Free DVD Format 183

An anonymous reader writes with an InfoWorld article on China's new attempt to introduce a royalty-free format to rival the DVD. The article is not sanguine on China's chances of getting the EVD format used outside of its own borders (they tried once before in 2003). The submitter is more optimistic, asking: "Is this the future and the effective end of DRM — to be taken and co-opted by nation-states?" From the article: "The DVD player makers plan to switch to EVD (enhanced versatile disk) in an attempt to avoid paying patent royalties on the DVD format, according to published reports. The world's largest producers of DVD players, Chinese electronics companies would use the format instead of standards such as MPEG-4. Last week, 20 top manufacturers including Haier announced their plans to switch from DVD to EVD entirely by 2008, according to a report in China Economic News."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

China Readies Royalty-Free DVD Format, Again

Comments Filter:
  • People's *VDs (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Doc Ruby ( 173196 ) on Saturday December 16, 2006 @06:23PM (#17271856) Homepage Journal
    Even China's "avant garde" [reference.com] attack on formats which don't fill China's mafia government Treasury is behind the vanguard of the Internet. The way to do half of what China is trying is to just release the DRM-free EVD format on the Web. Codec plugins, players, and encoded content (all open source so we can tell the Chinese haven't included any trojans). Even dual DVD/EVD-R HW, so we can backup our DVDs to EVDs, with PC connections so we can move our content across the Net. EVD would quickly dilute DVD, especially if cheap Chinese HW preferred EVD for features like sharing.

    The other half, which that strategy wouldn't do, is lock us into some Chinese format instead of DVD. We might not pay Chinese crony corps royalties this generation, but there's no way to stop them from using some lockin on the next gen, like when they increase density for HD-EVD, or some other creepy strategy they learned from the current Euramerican masters of the game. Releasing the format as a data format in open source rather than a HW format (ie. discs only) means that their attempt to upsell would be just another fork, which the rest of the world could ignore in favor of anyone's alternative upgrades.

    I think DVD Jon [wikipedia.org] should start giving code to some real "maverick" Chinese manufacturers right away.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 16, 2006 @06:26PM (#17271860)
    Make it backward compaitble (sic), and I'm there!

    Erm, the whole point is that they don't want to pay the royalties of the DVD format. In order to be backwards compatible, they would have to do pay them.

  • by Gordonjcp ( 186804 ) on Saturday December 16, 2006 @06:28PM (#17271878) Homepage
    If the EVD players are sitting on the shelves in ASDA for £24.95, the public will buy EVD players and demand EVD discs. It's just that simple.

    Not convinced? Then look at where the el-cheapo DVD players come from now...
  • Black Market (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Mark_MF-WN ( 678030 ) on Saturday December 16, 2006 @06:44PM (#17271980)

    That's one of the nice things about Canada -- we can freely buy a lot of the things that Americans can't due to retarded embargoes. We have cuban cigars at the store where I work. They're expensive, since they have to be flown in, but we have them.

    You know, for a country that spends so much time braying about its love of capitalism, Americans sure do their best to prevent any capitalism from happening. Cubans want to buy and sell their products in American markts? Sorry, no can do. Foreigners want to buy computer chips? Obviously they all just want to make nukes (forget for a moment that the computations are the easiest part of the entire processs, with or without computers...). China makes quality video players that aren't deliberately crippled? That's GOT to be banned -- using a product that you paid money for is supposed to unpleasant. Now China wants to make a quality video player that has even stronger DRM than domestic video players, and isn't encumbered by patent royalties; that's somehow evil as well. Seriously, who are the REAL communists here?

    It's sad that "socialist", "liberal" Canada embraces capitalism and free trade so much more fully than Americans, who've been duped into thinking that a "free market" means that you get to choose which state-mandated church you attend while the government works overtime to inhibit competition and international trade.

  • irony (Score:3, Insightful)

    by oohshiny ( 998054 ) on Saturday December 16, 2006 @06:46PM (#17272004)
    It's kind of ironic that China should restore free enterprise and free market competition by providing an alternative to the artificial DVD oligopoly.
  • G'luck (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 16, 2006 @06:52PM (#17272032)
    The consumer wont buy any DVD player if there is no content. And since Sony owns a bunch of movie studios, g'luck

  • by Gordonjcp ( 186804 ) on Saturday December 16, 2006 @07:24PM (#17272232) Homepage
    Right. So if you cannot get cheap Chinese DVD players any more - because they're making EVD now instead, and in fact EVD is cheaper because they're not paying a licence fee - the cost of players goes up. So, there are less people buying DVD players, less of a market for DVDs, and people buy the cheap EVD players and buy pirated EVDs that are straightforward dubs of DVDs for a couple of quid a time from a guy down the flea market.

    Either way, the DVD Consortium needs to stop pissing consumers off with region coding and other shit. That, and the movie industry needs to realise that falling sales aren't (entirely) due to "piracy" - they are because people don't really want to see American Pie 27 XTreme and watch all the same boring crap again.
  • Free Market (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Mark_MF-WN ( 678030 ) on Saturday December 16, 2006 @09:00PM (#17272948)

    I think you're confusing free markets with capitalism. Capitalism is all about monopolies, corruption, and destroying the competition. The entire idea is to take everything you can at any cost. Free markets are a different beast, and are a bit closer to what western nations (and even supposedly "communist" nations, these days) strive for. Capitalism is what we used to do back in the days of wondrous events like potato famines and great depressions.

    Going to mexico to buy things that are banned in America? Isn't that evidence that things are fucked? And it's not just cigars; we also import resources (nickel and cobalt, apparently) from Cuba, we can travel there on vacation (which a remarkable number of people I know have done), etc. We actually TRADE with Cuba, in a serious sense. America, meanwhile, posts security guards in the American zones of airports to make sure that Americans aren't trying to board flights to Cuba from other countries. Nice control-freak government you've got there. You should be proud that your ancestors died so that your government can decide where you go on vacation. I'm sure they would think that taking a British cannon round to the face was totally worthwhile to guarantee that their descendants would someday be sent to jail for duplicating a DVD (despite it being explicitly permitted in the constitution) or sharing (which the bible explicitly encourages, if you happen to think that the bible warrants anything other than scornful curiosity) artistic works.

    There's a list as long as your arm of tariffs imposed by the US to protect American workers from having to actually compete with the rest of the world. A remarkable number of products can't be exported at all, or only to a handful of friendly nations. Many types of software are completely banned in the US (it's interesting how most Linux distros have a "non-US" repository for software that Americans believe will destroy their economy and completely unhinge people's morality).

    Canada has some serious issues regarding free markets; but we're nowhere near as schizoid about it as Americans. At the very least we don't run around screaming about the evils of communism, trumpeting ourselves as the saviours of capitalism, and then prohibit people from engaging in basic reasonable forms of trade. The fact that America violates the free trade agreements that the US itself agitated for ... pretty much says it all.

  • by GodWasAnAlien ( 206300 ) on Saturday December 16, 2006 @10:05PM (#17273428)
    I will believe it is a Royalty-Free, Open standard when I see it.
    I have seen some mention of China releasing the spec, but is that to vendors only?
    And is there really no DRM?
    I will buy an EVD player and some discs if they are HD, and the specs are open, and no effective DRM is used. After all, I want to play the discs in Linux or whatever future device I want.
    Otherwise, I'll stick with the last effectively-open standard, DVD.
    DRM or private specification is the path of the Laser Disc.

  • Re:Cheap hardware? (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 17, 2006 @01:36AM (#17274656)
    According to Western studies on human rights offenses, yes. Fortunately for those nations that colonized the Western continents, these studies didn't begin until after wiping out the native populations.
  • Re:Free Market (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 17, 2006 @06:22AM (#17275930)
    In Australia, a majority of us a) don't see the need to be able to buy a gun, b) are worried about the amount of deadly force that a gun places in the hands of say, a kid that gets picked on at school, and c) uhh, no those two reasons are good enough.

    We can still buy a gun if we REALLY want to, but since not that many criminals/anti-social people run around with guns here, we generally don't need or want one. While a Cuban cigar may knock you off your feet, it's nowhere near as deadly/destructive as a gun. Why would you want a gun?
  • Re:Free Market (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Mark Maughan ( 763986 ) on Sunday December 17, 2006 @04:09PM (#17279222)
    Canadians have more guns per capita than Americans. You think they need better access or something?
  • Re:Free Market (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous McCartneyf ( 1037584 ) on Sunday December 17, 2006 @06:26PM (#17280336) Homepage Journal
    Amendments 1, 9, and 10?
    (I recommend that, if you must copy DVDs, you save the secret css-smasher for movies over 28 years old. Pretend you're working under a semi-reasonable copyright law--14+14 or 28+28. There aren't as many originals of the 28-year-old films, and the MPAA gets angriest at people copying hot hits.)

"If it ain't broke, don't fix it." - Bert Lantz

Working...