moon_monkey writes "New Scientist has a story about a nimble, four-legged robot that can recover its balance even after being given a hefty kick." From the article: "The project is sponsored by the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), who want the robotic pack mule to assist soldiers in terrain too tough for vehicles. Ground-based soldiers often need to carry 40 kilograms of equipment. Raibert says the latest version of BigDog can handle slopes of 35 - a steeper gradient than one in two. The hydraulics are driven by a two-stroke single-cylinder petrol engine, and it can carry over 40 kg, about 30% of its bodyweight. The robot can follow a simple path on its own, or can be remotely controlled."
Why is this better than just a mule? Let's see... Mules eat plants and grasses found naturally in the area. The electronic mule requires electricity. Great if you're in a city in the USA. Bad if you're in terrain thats "too tough for vehicles".
Let's see... mules are animals. How could a machine possibly be better than an animal?
A machine won't get spooked by gunfire a machine won't start making mating calls that alert the enemy to your position a machine won't take massive shits that a tracking dog could smell a machine doesn't die if it gets thirsty - you can go get more fuel and come back to it a week later or a month later.
I can see a whole lot of applications where a live animal wouldn't be as useful. Perhaps we should get rid of all the motorcycle police and make them use horses, too?
Perhaps we should get rid of all the horse police instead, make them use motorcycles... Or we could continue to use the best transportation for the task at hand. First: Yes, an untrained mule may be spooked be gunfire. On the other hand people have been training horses to go into battle for thousands years. Worst case scenario your packmule runs from behind cover and gets shot (assuming the enemy would bother shooting at fleeing livestock in the middle of a fight).
A few of the brothers in the Pack Animals Union chapter 107 would like a word with you, Mister "I-can-see-a-whole-lot-of-applications-where-a-liv e-animal-wouldn't-be-as-useful."
a - an engine can be turned off at will, and a mule cannot.
b - this is a proof of concept demonstrating the technology. the key here is that it can navigate rough terrain and has good balance. The source of rotational energy is hardly important at this point.
Sand isn't exactly friendly to the lungs of an animal, either, and at least when the robot dies you have a chance of repairing it. Good luck repairing your dead mule.
But when your mule dies in the bitter cold of the ice planet Hoth, you can slice it open with your lightsaber and shove your semi-conscious friend inside to keep warm while you build a proper shelter.
Mules, horses, camels, and others that I can't think of have been used since before recorded time. And they have always been a logistical nightmare, which is why they were replaced as soon as motorized vehicles became reliable enough. A mule eats and drinks every day. It can carry its own food and water, but that means it carries a lot less of what you needed it to carry. Or you spend a significant portion of your day foraging, which means you aren't accomplishing your mission.
Probably because you cant mount sensors and guns on a live mule and control its every action from the safety and comfort of Ft. Livingroom, plus living things are normally scared of huge explosions and imminent death. Also, live mules look pretty bad all shot the fuck up, but nobody gives 2 shits about some twisted metal.
...a nimble, four-legged robot that can recover its balance even after being given a hefty kick... The hydraulics are driven by a two-stroke single-cylinder petrol engine, and it can carry over 40 kg, about 30% of its bodyweight.
The most interesting thing is the "natural" looking motion of the "legs". At first I thought it was two guys up in some custom faking it as a robot! They are so natural!
The video delivers what is promised but notice that when it does go up that steep hill there is no 40+ kg of weight on it...
It also seems a bit to loud and well, in need of some body armor.
Godd question. It's interesting that the best special forces in the world could so nearly miss the world's most wanted man so many times. My friends and I believe he will be caught near some crucial election =D
Lets compare the benefits and costs of these endevours. Keeping in mind this project was probably long under development before 9/11 even happened; I give you a choice of two tasks:
1. Find one single person in the entire world who has an extensive network of people determined to keep him from showing up on the radar. 2. Build a robot that is able to carry a large amount of cargo over rough terrain and is rather self sufficient.
Benefits from Task 1: 1. Head of an organization brought down. However, since it
Getting Osama offers other benefits: - Discourage followers by exposing his myth to reality - Discourage new leaders by punishing him - Discourage other threats by showing attacking the US has consequences - Extracting info from Osama to help destroy the rest of his network
The robodonkey can wait.
Maybe it's because I live in NYC, where I'm from, and get to look at where the WTC used to be most days, that I actually care about getting the guy who did it. Maybe you think letting him go to work on a science projec
Dude, as I commented above, we're not pulling soldiers out of the war for this. DARPA money goes to universities and companies who do the research. Enlisted folks are all off in Iraq. They were flirting with the draft to get enough troops to chase down Iraq and their efforts in Afghanistan. The cut and dried truth is that there are plenty of other things that could be cut that would do a lot less damage the our country than DARPA funding (and the hard research funding took a deep slash this past year, in
- Discourage followers by exposing his myth to reality - Discourage new leaders by punishing him - Discourage other threats by showing attacking the US has consequences - Extracting info from Osama to help destroy the rest of his network
Geez... those sound a lot like the (various) reasons given for why the US invaded Iraq.
How do you feel about the diversion of resources from Afghanistan/Osama to Iraq?
Good, bad, or crucial to the global war on terror?
The robot looks fairly hilarious when it walks, since it moves a lot like two biped robots (imitating the motion of human legs) facing each other. The whining mechanical noise is also pretty funny, since it sounds like a mechanical goat. However, it does withstand the kick pretty impressively.
That is definitely a weird looking walk. It's fairly easy to imagine that it's just a couple of tiny people with very skinny legs and tight pants, like some bizarro two-person horse costume. After watching the video, though, I have some questions:
1. Can it jump? If so, how far? 2. Can it right itself if it does fall over? 3. Can it stand still without constant leg motion? (I know, some people can't do that, so it might be a lot to ask.) 4. How long before someone straps a latex phallus to it and makes pr
1. Probably; probably not too far 2. Only if it can get one set of legs to rotate under its body while the others stick out; because it's clearly too top-heavy to do any sort of a momentum-based roll
3. Sure it could stand without constant motion. It's a quadruped. Bipeds can fall over when stopped, if they don't use active balance, but quadrupeds should not.
4. I think the twee cowboy boots on the last dude who kicks it pretty much answer this question. Although, who could relax with all that noise? I
I wonder if having tons of slashdotters download a 3KB torrent will slashdot my free web provider.... should I provide a torrent of my torrent? Or a corel cache of my torrent of the torrent?
I just don't know why anyone would ever call it a "pack mule" when its real name, "BigDog", is so much cooler.
Also, did anyone watch the movie of BigDog? It looks really creepy, actually. I guess I was subconsciously expecting to see, oh I don't know, a big robotic dog, maybe Bell from "Bell and Sebastion" with metal instead of fur. Intead BigDog looks more like something you would frantically blow away in Starship Troopers before it rips your head off with its long insect-like legs. If I had one, I think I'd want to attach something to it that looks like a little like a head, at least. When they kick it, and it moves its legs to keep from falling over, I squirm. It's like it's ALMOST alive, but not quite.
This is a prototype. It will be refined with lighter, stronger material and a viable power supply. The algorithms will be improved. It will acquire vision.
Don't be surprised when you learn the eyes have cross hairs.
Don't bother having it mine for crystite in the river valley, remember to have it make enough energy to power itself and the rest of your empire, and make sure to take care when installing it so it doesn't run off....
Too bad that wonderful tools like this one have to be produced for the military. Wouldn't it be great if such a mule could assist use when we have to move? Moving all those boxes is just back-breaking work. Oh well, I guess I have to ask my friends again. Nevertheless, great stuff, well done!
I understand this thing is going to be travelling alongside our soldiers in dangerous situations, and they don't want it's noise to alert the enemy... but does it really have to blast that annoying Arabic music the whole time?!
Pack mules need to be fed even if you are just storing them in a camp. This thing can be packed tight in a box until you need it, then you just feed it the same gas that you feed your other vehicles. You're already shipping gas, but you aren't shipping much mule food to the camp. Sure, one the move a mule can eat some grass, but that becomes harder in the middle of the desert or while being shipped across the ocean.
Also, it's much harder to resupply a group under dangerous conditions with mules being led than it is with something you can remote control a group of across that same dangerous territory. As far as weight ratios, some of them can carry gas for the others, while those others carry what you want delivered. It's the same system trucks use.
Plus, I imagine (based on previous darpa results) these will end up quite a bit faster than mules are.
Picture remote controlled, locally autonomous truck convoys dropping these things off for the "last mile" delivery to the troops in the hills and you'll see where all this is going.
Of course, eventually they'll also use them for surveilance placements and then remote controlled combat.
Impressive sense of balance (the second kick in the video where it uses an almost simian method to get it's feet back under it is amazing). That's quite a step forward for robotics, though it's not particularly practical as a pack-mule alternative *yet*.
However, that thing desperately needs a muffler--is anybody else having flashbacks to "Dumb and Dumber"?
"Hey, you guys want to hear the most annoying sound in the world?"
Why do I say that? Because history teaches us that machines cannot neccessarily deliver victory during a war. In Iraq, IEDs are giving us havoc. The 1967 Israel war with the Arabs was won by Israel because they (the Israelis) destroyed almost all enemy tanks and APCs rendering the troops immobile! This robot would not survive an IED or landmine at all.
I am afraid it might be an example of the so called white elephant. Sadly, we in America have many of these.
A 1,200 lb mule can carry up to 240 lbs of pack, eats grasses found nearly everywhere, will be reasonably quiet when well-treated, is smart enough not to walk off a cliff when the mule skinner isn't paying the best of attention, and will cost you under US$2000 per head. In addition, we know mules can be combat-trained, as mule trains were used to pull artillery on battlefields, and when worse comes to worst, you can eat it.
This thing can carry a bit more, eats gasoline, makes as much noise as a gas turbine, will happily stroll into harm's way, and will likely cost on the order of a luxury car per unit. While there will be no training needed, when it breaks down it's just so much spare parts.
Part of the reason for wanting something that can go anywhere is that the trucks you currently have *can't*. So how are you going to refuel the mechanical mule? Can this thing pack enough spare fuel *and* have enough capacity left to be useful?
Finally, something that can carry a full keg, across abusive terrain and not fall down in a druken stupor. I see a great future renting these for senior class keggers. Maybe integrate the walker into the keg, So if the cops show up, and a little AI ( lots of shouting and the words "freeze assholes" ) it can run and hide in the forest with all the other kiddies.
I saw the video at video.google.com the other day, and it's impressive, but clearly needs some work. The balance mechanism only seems to work by lifting its leg and placing it farther away, which results in significant sideways travel when attempting to go straight in slippery terrain. Sort of like when you trip or slip and you have to throw a leg out in front of you to keep from falling. Actually exactly like that.. Imagine if you had to do that every time your balance shifted even slightly. While its ability to accurately place its legs to counter a fall is impressive, it's not the most elegant solution. The ability to lean and shift its center of gravity would help immensely. Once this thing can rear up on two legs and kick people, I'll be duely impressed.
A "slope of 35", mathematically, would fit into the formula y = 35x + C, which of course is greater than 1 in 2, but I highly doubt that this robot is climbing 88-degree hills.
Maybe you would have preferred it if they said "The robot can climb hills with a slope of approximately Pi/5!", so everyone who didn't take trig (and some who did) can stare blankly and say "wtf?"
Did I hear a "yay" for dimensionless units? Oh, yes, I think I did.
From the context it appears that "steeper than one in two" refers to the subject of the sentence, i.e. slopes. So, I guess that the slope they're talking about is a steeper slope than one in two or greater than 50% of slopes that exist? Wait, that doesn't really make sense... um. Yeah, units are helpful.
Anyway, I was sorry to see your reply to the Fucktard comment modded down as flamebait but I don't have any mod points just now.
Think of field servicability. A humble 2 stroke is about the simplest engine you can put in the field (apart froma diesel, but that's a different ballgame altogether). A 2 stroke has few parts (which also means less bits that can go wrong) and carrying spares is thus easy. I'm not sure if the power output to weight ratio is better as well, if I remember well from my motorcycle days that is pretty much a given too but that's not quite as scientific as I'd like;-). Having said that, it's only a theory. Ma
Why not just use ... a live mule? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why not just use ... a live mule? (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Why not just use ... a live mule? (Score:2)
Re:Why not just use ... a live mule? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Why not just use ... a live mule? (Score:4, Funny)
That's an AT-AT.
Parent
Re:Why not just use ... a live mule? (Score:5, Interesting)
A machine won't get spooked by gunfire
a machine won't start making mating calls that alert the enemy to your position
a machine won't take massive shits that a tracking dog could smell
a machine doesn't die if it gets thirsty - you can go get more fuel and come back to it a week later or a month later.
I can see a whole lot of applications where a live animal wouldn't be as useful. Perhaps we should get rid of all the motorcycle police and make them use horses, too?
Parent
Re:Why not just use ... a live mule? (Score:3, Insightful)
First: Yes, an untrained mule may be spooked be gunfire. On the other hand people have been training horses to go into battle for thousands years. Worst case scenario your packmule runs from behind cover and gets shot (assuming the enemy would bother shooting at fleeing livestock in the middle of a fight).
Second: Mating calls from a mule? Mules are
Re:Why not just use ... a live mule? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Why not just use ... a live mule? (Score:3, Insightful)
b - this is a proof of concept demonstrating the technology. the key here is that it can navigate rough terrain and has good balance. The source of rotational energy is hardly important at this point.
Sand isn't exactly friendly to the lungs of an animal, either, and at least when the robot dies you have a chance of repairing it. Good luck repairing your dead mule.
Re:Why not just use ... a live mule? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Why not just use ... a live mule? (Score:3, Funny)
Yes it can. The hard part is switching it on again.
Re:Why not just use ... a live mule? (Score:2)
Why did they get rid of mules in the first place? (Score:2, Interesting)
A mule eats and drinks every day. It can carry its own food and water, but that means it carries a lot less of what you needed it to carry. Or you spend a significant portion of your day foraging, which means you aren't accomplishing your mission.
Gasoline has a very good ene
Re:Why not just use ... a live mule? (Score:2, Insightful)
Hefty Kick? (Score:2, Insightful)
Who's the brute who kicked that robot?
Re:Hefty Kick? (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Looking Real (Score:4, Insightful)
The video delivers what is promised but notice that when it does go up that steep hill there is no 40+ kg of weight on it...
It also seems a bit to loud and well, in need of some body armor.
Parent
Your Tax Dollars at Work (Score:5, Funny)
WHERE'S OSAMA?
Re:Your Tax Dollars at Work (Score:2)
Needle (Score:2, Informative)
Keeping in mind this project was probably long under development before 9/11 even happened; I give you a choice of two tasks:
1. Find one single person in the entire world who has an extensive network of people determined to keep him from showing up on the radar.
2. Build a robot that is able to carry a large amount of cargo over rough terrain and is rather self sufficient.
Benefits from Task 1:
1. Head of an organization brought down. However, since it
Re:Needle (Score:2)
http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/issues/2002
That article is from 2002 (first page of google), but I know the article I saw was from 2005.
Coward (Score:2)
- Discourage followers by exposing his myth to reality
- Discourage new leaders by punishing him
- Discourage other threats by showing attacking the US has consequences
- Extracting info from Osama to help destroy the rest of his network
The robodonkey can wait.
Maybe it's because I live in NYC, where I'm from, and get to look at where the WTC used to be most days, that I actually care about getting the guy who did it. Maybe you think letting him go to work on a science projec
Re:Coward (Score:2)
They were flirting with the draft to get enough troops to chase down Iraq and their efforts in Afghanistan. The cut and dried truth is that there are plenty of other things that could be cut that would do a lot less damage the our country than DARPA funding (and the hard research funding took a deep slash this past year, in
Re:Coward (Score:2)
Geez... those sound a lot like the (various) reasons given for why the US invaded Iraq.
How do you feel about the diversion of resources from Afghanistan/Osama to Iraq?
Good, bad, or crucial to the global war on terror?
Re:Your Tax Dollars at Work (Score:2)
Seriously, they're not taking troops out of the war for this. DARPA funding is going to universities and private companies to fund stuff like this.
They were flirting with the draft over the Iraq war... I guess that what you're saying is that you want to be drafted to go and find Osama?
Perhaps there are better things to cut than research.
Video of the robot (Score:5, Informative)
The robot looks fairly hilarious when it walks, since it moves a lot like two biped robots (imitating the motion of human legs) facing each other. The whining mechanical noise is also pretty funny, since it sounds like a mechanical goat. However, it does withstand the kick pretty impressively.
Re:Video of the robot (Score:2)
After watching the video, though, I have some questions:
1. Can it jump? If so, how far?
2. Can it right itself if it does fall over?
3. Can it stand still without constant leg motion? (I know, some people can't do that, so it might be a lot to ask.)
4. How long before someone straps a latex phallus to it and makes pr
Re:Video of the robot (Score:2)
2. Only if it can get one set of legs to rotate under its body while the others stick out; because it's clearly too top-heavy to do any sort of a momentum-based roll
3. Sure it could stand without constant motion. It's a quadruped. Bipeds can fall over when stopped, if they don't use active balance, but quadrupeds should not.
4. I think the twee cowboy boots on the last dude who kicks it pretty much answer this question. Although, who could relax with all that noise? I
Re:Video of the robot (Score:2, Informative)
Does it make sense to post a torrent on a relatively small file (27MBs)? I guess we will find out. I'm seeding the download for now. Good luck.
http://marciot.freeshell.org/BigDog_Feb-26-2006.wm v.torrent [freeshell.org]
I wonder if having tons of slashdotters download a 3KB torrent will slashdot my free web provider.... should I provide a torrent of my torrent? Or a corel cache of my torrent of the torrent?
its BigDog, not "pack mule" (Score:5, Interesting)
Also, did anyone watch the movie of BigDog? It looks really creepy, actually. I guess I was subconsciously expecting to see, oh I don't know, a big robotic dog, maybe Bell from "Bell and Sebastion" with metal instead of fur. Intead BigDog looks more like something you would frantically blow away in Starship Troopers before it rips your head off with its long insect-like legs. If I had one, I think I'd want to attach something to it that looks like a little like a head, at least. When they kick it, and it moves its legs to keep from falling over, I squirm. It's like it's ALMOST alive, but not quite.
Re:its BigDog, not "pack mule" (Score:2)
Likewise, and I don't hesitate to admit it.
This is a prototype. It will be refined with lighter, stronger material and a viable power supply. The algorithms will be improved. It will acquire vision.
Don't be surprised when you learn the eyes have cross hairs.
Re:its BigDog, not "pack mule" (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
M.U.L.E. (Score:3, Funny)
Moving (Score:2)
Nevertheless, great stuff, well done!
Annoying sound (Score:2)
Cost comparison? (Score:3, Insightful)
-jcr
Re:Cost comparison? (Score:5, Insightful)
Pack mules need to be fed even if you are just storing them in a camp. This thing can be packed tight in a box until you need it, then you just feed it the same gas that you feed your other vehicles. You're already shipping gas, but you aren't shipping much mule food to the camp. Sure, one the move a mule can eat some grass, but that becomes harder in the middle of the desert or while being shipped across the ocean.
Also, it's much harder to resupply a group under dangerous conditions with mules being led than it is with something you can remote control a group of across that same dangerous territory. As far as weight ratios, some of them can carry gas for the others, while those others carry what you want delivered. It's the same system trucks use.
Plus, I imagine (based on previous darpa results) these will end up quite a bit faster than mules are.
Picture remote controlled, locally autonomous truck convoys dropping these things off for the "last mile" delivery to the troops in the hills and you'll see where all this is going.
Of course, eventually they'll also use them for surveilance placements and then remote controlled combat.
Parent
Neat, but needs a muffler. (Score:3, Funny)
However, that thing desperately needs a muffler--is anybody else having flashbacks to "Dumb and Dumber"?
"Hey, you guys want to hear the most annoying sound in the world?"
this will be of no consequence! (Score:2)
I am afraid it might be an example of the so called white elephant. Sadly, we in America have many of these.
Let's see here... (Score:5, Insightful)
This thing can carry a bit more, eats gasoline, makes as much noise as a gas turbine, will happily stroll into harm's way, and will likely cost on the order of a luxury car per unit. While there will be no training needed, when it breaks down it's just so much spare parts.
Part of the reason for wanting something that can go anywhere is that the trucks you currently have *can't*. So how are you going to refuel the mechanical mule? Can this thing pack enough spare fuel *and* have enough capacity left to be useful?
I think I'll stick with the mule.
Beer mule (Score:4, Insightful)
Jim.
Slashdot has changed (Score:5, Interesting)
Since when do Slashdot readers feel the need to criticize large government agencies who fund R&D for building robots?
Jeez people. This thing is cool.
It's not only useful... (Score:3, Funny)
Balance (Score:3, Informative)
Dimensionless, fucktard (Score:4, Informative)
A "gradient of one in two" is a dimensionless ratio. A slope is the mathematical slope in %, which, again, is a dimensionless ratio.
Parent
Re:Dimensionless, fucktard (Score:2)
Re:If you were my student, I'd fail you (Score:2, Insightful)
Did I hear a "yay" for dimensionless units? Oh, yes, I think I did.
Re:If you were my student, I'd fail you (Score:2)
Anyway, I was sorry to see your reply to the Fucktard comment modded down as flamebait but I don't have any mod points just now.
Low parts count (Score:3, Insightful)
Having said that, it's only a theory. Ma
Re:tracks? (Score:3, Insightful)
> weight mounted so high it becomes less of an issue.
I guess that must be why horses, deer, antelope, etc. all have such short legs.