Undervolting a Laptop 262
Delph1 writes "Laptops often comes with two Achilles heels, heat and limited battery time. There are, if not cures, at least remedies to make them less obvious. By lowering the voltage to the processor you can not only drastically lower the heat dissipation, but also increase the battery time significantly. NordicHardware gives a nice walk through on the process and was able to boast 18% lower temperature and a 20% reduced power consumption."
Counter productive maybe? (Score:5, Insightful)
Surely if you drop the voltage your are going to have to under-clock the processor (reasoning that to over-clock you need to increase the voltage). Most processors for laptops already throttle the processor down when under light load now-a-days which must be a great energy saving. Would under volting it really then save more or would you just end up with a laptop that is dog slow? I'm sure if it was this easy one of the big laptop producers would already be doing it as a 20% increase for basically nothing would give them a fantastic advantage.
Re:Counter productive maybe? (Score:1, Insightful)
Lots of laptop manufacturers are bundling appropriate software to do this for you these days, too.
18% -- that's really funny (Score:5, Insightful)
In celsius, their reduction is 26 to 18 degrees, a reduction of 31%
Why not define a new scale with the same degrees but 0 degrees (new scales) = 63 degrees F. Now on the new scale they've reduced the temperature from 15 to 1 degree, a reduction of 94%....wow that's way better than their lousy 18%.
Their number is totally meaningless.
Also, "undervolting" is not a word.
Why? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Counter productive maybe? (Score:5, Insightful)
What the guy is doing, however, is trying to lower the voltage consumption to the line where the processor starts to behave a little flaky, and then pumping it up just a bit over that. Processors are made in big batches, some of them just work better than others. If yours happens to be one of the good ones in the batch, you can reduce the voltage while maintaining performance (not needing to bump down the clock speed).
If you really obsess over it, you go into the research that my roommate does, where he spends endless hours, days, and weeks tweaking processor floor plans and running them through simulators. You might hope to build a more efficient processor through all of this.
I wouldn't recommend doing this if you're not partial to your laptop randomly hanging while you're working on it, but everyone needs a hobby.
Re:Too much misinformation here. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:18% -- that's really funny (Score:4, Insightful)
Pre: 24 degrees Fahrenheit over room temp
Post: 12 degress Fahrenheit over room temp, a 50% savings!
Obviously no amount of undervolting would ever get the processor to absolute zero, it's going to bottom out at room temperature (when reduced to 0 volts).
Re:18% -- that's really funny (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Parent is a Bad Idea (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:No Con's? (Score:2, Insightful)
Half of slashdot is clueless on this one... (Score:2, Insightful)
I can also take my min speed voltage -- 700MHz -- and reduce it as well, from 0.988 to 0.700 V.
The REASON for doing this is that Intel gives a generous amount of power to their CPUs--enough to make sure ALL (or at least 99%) of their wafers from the factor work correctly. More often than not, you can decrease their "safe" value an appreciable amount to raise battery life and lower thermal output.