Intel Loses Market Share to AMD 283
diverge_s wrote to mention an article examining Intel's market share loss to AMD in the fourth quarter of 2005. From the article: "Sales of Intel-based desktop PCs fell 22.3 percent during the fourth quarter, according to Current Analysis. As a result, sales of AMD-based desktops took the lead during the pivotal fourth-quarter holiday shopping season. AMD chips were found in 52.5 percent of desktop PCs sold in U.S. retail stores during that period."
Is AMD profitable? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Point of interest (Score:5, Interesting)
pricewatch.com [pricewatch.com] Says the slowest Sempron being produced is the 2200+ and you can have it delivered for $57. For $60 you can get a 2.2Ghz Celeron which is no match for AMD's processor. The 2.2Ghz P4 costs $79 delivered, $22 more than the AMD offering.
The reason all those AMD chips appeared before Christmas was because they are so competitive at the lower end. When you match that with their server options AMD are wiping the floor with Intel at almost every level.
Eh.. (Score:0, Interesting)
Two factors that are important! (Score:2, Interesting)
2) The speed of most newer computers is so ridiculously fast compared to just a couple of years ago that the processor just doesn't matter to the average PC buyer. Most people want to read their email, surf the web and store their digital photos. They are not running CAD or compiling code or editing full feature films. Even the lower end PCs available in stores these days can perform the average tasks just as well as the high end system. Therefore, again, the purchase experience will be motivated by price!
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:How's the laptop market doing? (Score:2, Interesting)
I know exactly why this is because I worked at Best Buy for three months. When centrino was introduced there were commercials everywhere. These commercials, intentional or otherwise, made it seem like centrino was the only way to connect wirelessly saying things like "Centrino technology is a huge advancement in wireless networking for people on the go". This statement was true, as centrino allowed for longer battery life and generally laptops using centrino were lower weight, allowing for longer use and easier transport. This was not conveyed by the advertisements though, as the vast majority of people coming in to buy a laptop thought that centrino and wireless were the same thing.
AMD to the rescue ;-) (Score:3, Interesting)
So if Intel gets too aggressive on Apple, we might see Apple computers with AMD CPUs
Re:How's the laptop market doing? (Score:2, Interesting)
So, whether I buy new MacBook or Intel Somethino (tm), it is likely to be Intel.
And I strongly suspect, that every laptop chip is today more profitable, than 5 desktops-for-sale.
Re:Beige boxes? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Way To Jobs! (Score:3, Interesting)
Apple Inc. sells Apple computers with Apple Mac OS X. Apple doesn't sell Intel Inside computers.
Re:I have always drooled over (Score:2, Interesting)
You have to get your Java from Apple. I was stuck all through OSX 10.3.x with an old Java. Sun doesn't offer a build. Apple did bundle an update with OSX 10.4.
Gosling mentioned in an interview that he builds the latest Java on his Linux box, and copies the JARs over to his PowerBook. Somehow I haven't found enough spare time to try to do that myself. However I think Gosling slowly tried this over a long period of time that he spent using X tunneling to use his native Linux build of Java on the Linux box, and experimenting with the individual JARs one at a time. Theoretically I would think using a slightly older JVM with a newer environment would not be a problem, except for the Cocoa hooks. Maybe you can use X for the gui stuff? As I said, don't know, haven't tried. Lots of people have failed to make this work, though I don't know how much effort they put into it. Netbeans works fine on OSX BTW, there is a release on their site.
Re:Godd quality and low prices work :) (Score:4, Interesting)
I have always thought that Intel has a high yield, quality process. However, their prices have always been higher than AMD, Cyrix, and any of the other competitors over the years. If their yield was good, then there was no reason for them to be higher priced. I always felt that they were gouging the customers, so I quit designing them into my systems. Since they are still higher priced than AMD for competing parts, I wonder if their yield has always been not so good.