Leaked Pictures of Socket F 267
Robbedoeske writes "Dutch language site Tweakers.net has the first pictures of AMD's Socket F, aka Socket 1207. This socket introduces support for DDR 2 memory and some say it will offer the ability for a integrated PCI Express controller on the cpu. Socket F is meant to be used in systems with more than one Opteron cpu."
PGA (Score:4, Interesting)
next step? (Score:4, Interesting)
.nyud.net:8090 images (Score:2, Interesting)
http://img259.imageshack.us.nyud.net:8090/my.php?i mage=0015ep.jpg [nyud.net]
http://img259.imageshack.us.nyud.net:8090/my.php?i mage=0024yp.jpg [nyud.net]
http://img259.imageshack.us.nyud.net:8090/my.php?i mage=0032cd.jpg [nyud.net]
Just in case
Yet another socket (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:next step? (Score:4, Interesting)
Single-chip computers - A CPU, and a totally passive backplane that does nothing but provide real-estate for connectors. And most likely, you wouldn't strictly need any extra cards, with a decent (but not high end, thus the need for a bus at all) GPU included right on-die.
Realistically, I expect two-chip computers as far more likely. Something along the lines of having your CPU plug directly into your video card, which has the standard video card parts on one side, and standard motherboard connectors on the other. And the whole thing could mount via a SECC-style connector to a power bus, right inside something just a tad bigger than current ATX power supplies.
Drives? Uhhh... I'll have to think about that one.
Looks fake to me. (Score:1, Interesting)
The whole pin area looks too "flat" as well...
Re:FB-DIMM? (Score:1, Interesting)
I wonder why AMD isn't just skipping DDR2 and going straight to FB-DIMM?
Maybe FB-DIMM will only be for really big 4+ CPU systems? Maybe FB-DIMM negates advantages of integrated memory controller?
Re:AMD Beating The Crap Out Of Intel? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:AMD Beating The Crap Out Of Intel? (Score:4, Interesting)
Quite easy when you realize that that majority of consumers don't actually use the full capacity of their CPU very often. If you look at games the GPU is far more important than the CPU, which leaves heavy CPU use to media encoders, compilers and scientic processing. That's not really a big share of the market.
Civ4 mins: 1.2 GHz or equivalent
SW Battlefront II mins: 1.5 GHz or equivalent
Call of Duty II mins: Pentium IV 1.4GHz or AMD Athlon 1.4 GHz or equivalent
Age of Empires III: 1.4 GHz equivalent or higher processor or equivalent
F.E.A.R. mins: Pentium(R) 4 - 1.7 GHz or equivalent
Sims 2: 800 MHz processor or equivalent
Quake 4: 2.0 Ghz or equivalent
Those are some of the latest games released. PIV 2.0GHz was shipping in june 2002, so they are over three years behind the state of the art. And games are normally the most intense apps a user has. Basicly, an Intel machine does pretty much everything a computer user wants to do, so does an AMD. The rest is simply mindshare and momentum. Intel can drop their prices at any time if the market is slipping. They are simply balancing out taking out extra profit versus the threat AMD poses. If they don't watch out, they'll take a spanking in the professional market though, where admins are much more aware of what they're buying...
Re:Yes, he counted them (Score:3, Interesting)
Even the dutch text was badly written, so excuses for the grammar and spelling. It's always hard to translate anything other than your own thoughts