Robot Catches High Speed Objects 273
shpoffo writes "Engineers at the University of Tokyo in Japan have created a robot that can catch a ball moving faster than 186 miles per hour (300 kph) - more than 270 feet per second. It uses an array of photodetectors to directly control the three finger actuators - which can rotate 180 degrees in 0.1 seconds. It's only catching softballs at the moment, but operators are optimistic for it to soon catch other objects and grasp moving things. A video with odd sci-fi TV-series (coral cache) accents is available."
Robotic fly catcher. (Score:4, Insightful)
The reality is that the robot has no idea what its catching. It doesn't know how to recognise a ball. The chances are that a fast moving object is easier to identify that a stationary one, as you just grab the thing that is moving rather than identifying a shape and deciding if that is the thing you want to collect.
Still an interesting technology showcase, but I'm still no closer to my robot slave
Re:The robot is all thumbs. (Score:3, Insightful)
Shows just how powerfull the human brain is (Score:4, Insightful)
While the raw maths is pretty simple by itself, when you factor in stereo image processing to see a ball, work out it's speed and trajectory, and move potentially hundreds of muscles into the correct position to catch the ball, you realise just how powerful the human brain is and how well it can adapt.
Re:Is the US lagging behind Japan? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Idiot Land-speed Record (Score:3, Insightful)
I know the imperialists always convert from mph to kph in this manner when telling us of the superiority of the imperial system that their imperial overlords insist on, however do we really have to stoop so low as to give the speed to 6 s.f.? Do we really think the limiters are accurate to less than one thousandth of a percent? That's like saying a running track is length-accurate to about the thickness of you fingernail.
Re:Sure, if it's thrown straight at it (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Robotic fly catcher. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Define catching... (Score:3, Insightful)
A human has to do that due to the limitations of the hand and arm. Catching a ball thrown hard enough might well break your wrist. A suitably constructed robot would have no such structural limitations.
A mitt is really useful because it allows the momentum to be absorbed into a wide area.
And you (nor I) cannot catch a ball, thrown directly at you, at 1/2 the speed that this robot can, without one. Ok....maybe once or twice. Try it all day as a catcher at a baseball game, and eventually you'll slip and break a finger.
Think of weightlifting. An Olympic class weightlifter can do maybe 1000 lbs. A robotic forklift can do 10,000 or 100,000 lbs, all day long, without even trying.
So this is a limited tech display. The photo detection and actuator designs may well find themselves in something else. Something more useful.
Re:Is the US lagging behind Japan? (Score:5, Insightful)
On the one hand, we have recent event whittling away at the rights of both white- and blue-collar workers, from "no compete" contracts to laws allowing employers to prevent employees from fraternizing after working hours (at least accordin to Slashdot). On the other hand, we have overly zealous unions that can work to prevent employers from adopting technologies that would replace human workers (I've heard anecdotes of labor unions in the Port of Los Angeles fighting automation). Mix in a government giving US companies all the immigrant and offshoring opportunities they want, is it any surprise that the US is sliding behind in robotics in particular and technology in general?
Technology only succeeds when it is cheaper to use than human labor, and human labor is pretty damned cheap in the US.
Re:Shows just how powerfull the human brain is (Score:3, Insightful)
They don't plan they just "do", that's what makes them great catchers, nobody told them about the math.