Green buildings, Green Server Farms?

mstansberry writes "Has IT evolved to the point where it can consider energy efficiency without sacrificing uptime or performance? According to an interview with APC's Richard Sawyer, the answer is yes. The green buildings movement, spearheaded by the USGBC and other organizations has some people thinking about computing infrastructure's impact on the environment. Is it an IT issue or something from C-level executives?"

"C-Level Executive"?

[dstone]

I thought I was filling out the cover pages on my TPS Reports properly, but I don't know what a "C-Level Executive" is. Do I have to meet with the Bobs to find out?

Green Server Farm

[Anonymous Coward]

(Formerly Grow Room)

P.S. That skunky smell is ozone. Yeah, ozone. That's the ticket.

toxic chemicals..

[PopeAlien]

Last time I checked my computer was a box full of toxic chemicals

Ah! but what color are these chemicals?

Can you get by with...

[Tenebrious1]

That drives initiatives like consolidation. If you have 10,000 servers that are only 20% utilized, can't you get by with 2,000? The answer is probably no. But you might be able to get by with 4,000 and cut your cost in half on the equipment side. And then you start to look at not only the capital investment, but also the expense investment.

What kind of wacky PHB approves the purchase of 10,000 servers when he only needs 4000? And more importantly, is he hiring?

Re:8am, Day 1: STOP THE WASTE

[Radix37]

90% of websites could run on a 486 and nobody would notice a difference

Until Slashdot strikes...