Self-Replicating Robots 305
ABC News is running a story that self-replicating robots are no longer the stuff of science fiction. Scientists at Cornell University have created small robots that can build copies of themselves. Here is a movie demonstrating the self-replication process. And the paper that will be published in Thursdays issue of Nature.
That's not self replication (Score:5, Insightful)
Lame.
Not exactly "gray goo" (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Not replication (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:That's not self replication (Score:3, Insightful)
Who said that replication must involve the original robot to create the robot parts? And even if it did, it would still have to create these "spare parts" from smaller parts anyway...
The robot is replicating itself from it's own basic building blocks from what I can see.
Re:That's not self replication (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:That's not self replication (Score:5, Insightful)
Indeed. Last I checked, humans and other animals couldn't self-replicate either, but needed to have raw materials preprocessed by things like plants first.
I have a better design (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm sure I've seen more bogus papers than usual go by recently.
Re:Not exactly "gray goo" (Score:3, Insightful)
I envision a factory in which molds are created using rapid prototyping technology, purely from machine-produced 3D parts specifications. Initially, these designs could be hand-created by humans, but automated modifications could certainly be done and with complex enough design software, parts could be created and assembled in a fully automated way.
Think of a drive mechanism that uses four wheels, but testing shows that it needs more wheels to support the weight; the rear axle could be lengthened and a wheel added on each side, and the heavy part of the load could be shifted rearward. This kind of design improvement isn't simple to codify, but then the software used for routing paths on a PC board has more complex rules than these.
This is coming, it's only a matter of time. I give it 20 years before it's applied commercially.
Re:That's not self replication (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Edward F. Moore's 1959 self-reproducers (Score:3, Insightful)
We are just fancier examples of the same thing.
Re: What about the SG-1 team? (Score:2, Insightful)