Apple Patents Tablet Mac (with Photos) 565
jkheit writes "I wrote a quick news item over at the Mac Observer that might be of interest. Apple patents a tablet Mac. The new photos confirm that this device is a touch-screen Apple tablet. You can see it here."
Smart Screen Anyone? (Score:1, Insightful)
Could be interesting; too bad the article is so light on details.
Re:Photos???? Comment + mirror (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Patent? (Score:2, Insightful)
-truth
Re:Patent? (Score:5, Insightful)
Ya, but this is exactly what people said when Apple made the iPod.
Apple likes to swoop on good ideas that have been poorly implemented in the past. MP3 players, jukebox software, online music stores, video chat, etc etc. None of this stuff was new, but Apple found a way to make it more accessible and desirable.
billions? (Score:3, Insightful)
Billions?
When the iPod went mainstream it ate everyone's lunch, but at first it was a niche product from a niche computer manufacturer. Now white headphones are becoming as ubiquitous as cell phones.
I'll reserve judgement until I see an iTablet, but the general idea isn't making me all gooey inside either. Who's to say whether it'll make the light of day.
I'd be very surprised if Apple launched an iTablet. Totally shocked if they dusted off the Newton idea.
Single mousebutton! (Score:3, Insightful)
A touchpad!
Oooohh.. Jobs was ahead of the curve all along...
Re:Photos???? Comment + mirror (Score:2, Insightful)
You mean like the iPod? Pretty big, I'd say, depending on the application.
Steve Jobs has made comments about the iPod not lending itself to being a decent video player due to its tiny display. A tablet, on the other hand....
Not a sure thing (Score:3, Insightful)
That said, just because Apple has a patent doesn't mean they're going to ever build the thing. Personally, though, I hope this turns out to be the announcement at WWDC. I'd love to have a tablet Mac, just for reading places like here on the couch. My laptop is nice, but not too comfortable... though the keyboard is more useful for chat or long replies.
It's certainly a niche design, so I could see Apple patenting a decent design that their engineers came up with even if they never build the product. That way, they can always change their mind later if the market really wants an Apple tablet.
Um, no. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Using Tiger (Score:4, Insightful)
If Apple did this, I would expect the screen to automatically rotate what is "up" based on how you hold the tablet. The little gyro in the latest PowerBooks should be enough to allow them to do that.
Re:Photos???? Comment + mirror (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Not even close... (Score:3, Insightful)
How about the "iPad"...?
Re:Mac (Score:1, Insightful)
a Mac tablet (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:They are, check Tiger, it has built in function (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Okay, somebody's got to say it . . . (Score:3, Insightful)
The touchscreen is different from tablets (Score:4, Insightful)
This is interesting. A year ago, I was predicting that Apple would get on the tablet bandwagon (and possibly pull off another ipod), because tablets are so suited to art, which is ostensibly one of apples big markets. (I have a normal wacom digitizer on my desktop, but I find I prefer to use the screen digitiser of may tablet for photoshop, etc, - even though the CRT of the desktop beats any LCD on a portable).
Yet their design is for a finger touch screen. This would make for perhaps a better interface than pen for something simple like an ebook or portable video player (a video ipod allowing you rent DRMed movies from apple
I have a convertable tablet (it operates in slate and laptop mode), and my experience is that it is a vast improvement over laptops when in laptop mode, but slate mode, while kind of cool, it typically limited to low-input tasks like watching DVDs, because I type at twice the speed I write.
So I doubt this tablet is going to be marketed as a mac. It may contain a mac, but it's going to take aim at more specialised tasks.
Unless they stick one of those laser keyboards on it that convert any flat surface into a keyboard. It's about time someone built one of those into a slate computer.
And now that epaper is becoming possible, ebook readers that failed to suck might be another ipod waiting to happen.
Re:Patent? (Score:4, Insightful)
A design patent is not quite the same as what one normally thinks of when talking about patents. Basically all this move indicates is that nobody can release a tablet that looks like what Apple would design. It's meant to prevent rip-offs, not stifle innovation. Of course, I fully expect someone to claim that rip-offs are innovative.
Re:Patent? (Score:2, Insightful)
It's more like Apple is the only computer maker that has a significant investment in design, and thus the only one with a reason to protect that investment.
Re:Single mousebutton! (Score:4, Insightful)
While most tablet styluses come with a right-button in the lower half of the pen, they're often easy to accidentally press and many users like myself instead disable it and set the tablet settings to treat a TAP-AND-HOLD as a right-click.
When you're not holding a mouse, "right-clicking" a tablet is a slower means of interacting. Software designed with one button in mind works much more efficiently and naturally.
This is quite important, as until Tablet PC "takes off" (it hasn't by any means), most software that runs on is mainstream, non-tablet-aware software. An OS which encourages one-mouse development could have a distinct advantage.
Re:Photos???? Comment + mirror (Score:1, Insightful)
Apple's computers and notebooks are marketed as "upper class" computers. They are clearly not competing with the PCs if you look at their price, their hardware lock-in, and their software.
I imagine their tablet PCs will go into the same niche market rather than into the broader one. Which is probably fine with Apple since they seem to be making plenty of money from this niche.
Re:billions? (Score:4, Insightful)
The grandparent post is more correct than you give it credit for. A cellphone is used for how many minutes per hour on average... maybe 5 ? An average iPod owner probably exceeds 30 mins per hour average usage. So, if you multiply the number of iPods sold by the visibility factor the iPod is becoming ubiquitous.
Re:Haha... (Score:3, Insightful)
umm... cuz it runs OSX?
Re:billions? (Score:2, Insightful)
By your calculations, Calvin Klein thong underwear for men will soon be more popular than cell phones because its users probably wear the underwear for upwards of 14 hours a day continuous!
Re:Photos???? Comment + mirror (Score:3, Insightful)
An MP3 player is just a modern Walkman. The "Walkman market" hasn't been "niche" for about twenty years.
"Niche" != "immature".
The tablet PC market is niche. It's niche because its practical applications - advantageously over existing alternatives - are very small.
MP3 players have never been a niche market. They've been am *immature and growing* market, but the idea of a "pocket music player" hasn't been a niche market since the late 70s/early 80s.
Re:Um, no. (Score:2, Insightful)
wait, wait, i have an even better answer: if it has finger-touch screen technology, why couldn't you type right on the screen on a displayed keyboard? (i use one of those Fingerworks keyboards which is not so dissimilar.)
in short, your question is myopic.
Re:what i heard (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Patent? (Score:1, Insightful)
Apple likes to swoop on good ideas that have been poorly implemented in the past.
That's right folks! And we call this process 'innovation'! Try an example sentence: The iPod is a product of Apple's 'innovation'!
Now, when icky companies do it, the process has a different name. We call it 'copying'! Example sentence: Windows is a product of Micro$oft's 'copying'!
Remember, this material will appear in your Slashdot Exam! Those not scoring 100% will be beaten on the head with penguin dolls until they conform! Conform! CONFORM!
Enjoy!
Re:it will work this time (Score:3, Insightful)
Nope. what really killed Newton was 3 simple words:
Eat... up... martha.
Re:it will work this time (Score:4, Insightful)
* Too big to fit in my pocket so I could carry it with me everywhere
* Too small to be able to see very much data at once
On the plus side, the interface was amazing. It was actually designed to be used with a pen, not just a modified desktop UI.
So now I use a Palm, because it lets me have my calendar and contact info with me all the time (as well as other stuff, of course, but the main thing I use it for is calendar and contacts). And its interface is ok.
But I still miss my Newton. I'd love to have a Newtonesque tablet. Even one with a display the size of a steno pad would be excellent.