Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Portables Hardware

A History of Portable Computing 281

PCM2 writes "MobilePC magazine is running an exhaustive history of portable computers, going all the way from the IBM Portable 5100 to last year's OQO. Do you remember the three-pound Epson HX-20 from 1982 that boasted a 50-hour battery life? Or that the first color portable came from Commodore? Interesting stuff." They have the compaq luggable I learned BASIC on in middle school in the 80s. 28lbs of power baby!
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

A History of Portable Computing

Comments Filter:
  • No TRS-80's? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by glen604 ( 750214 ) on Wednesday March 23, 2005 @12:24PM (#12024736)
    What about the Model 100/102/200? Those were some pretty good computers, and iirc sold quite well.

    or at least it was my first laptop, and I have many fond memories of downloading games off of a bbs on a 300bps modem
  • OQO? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by cvdwl ( 642180 ) <cvdwl someplace around yahoo> on Wednesday March 23, 2005 @12:24PM (#12024737)
    Can someone review one of these? After all the hype, they've sort-of disappeared now that they're out there. Is it world-shaking and under produced (Apple), or kludged, unreliable and annoying?

    Extra points if you post from the OQO.

  • by KyleJacobson ( 788441 ) on Wednesday March 23, 2005 @12:24PM (#12024740)
    To expand on your comment... The military definition of portable is if two people can move it with vehicles, to include but not limited to a truck, crane, plane, etc..
  • by tabkey12 ( 851759 ) on Wednesday March 23, 2005 @12:24PM (#12024744) Homepage
    Look here at the PowerBook 100 [mobilepcmag.com].

    I think every laptop I have ever owned is basically a very similar variant of that simple design! Way to go Apple.

  • Ahhh, Compaq. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mopslik ( 688435 ) on Wednesday March 23, 2005 @12:25PM (#12024755)

    They have the compaq luggable I learned BASIC on in middle school in the 80s.

    I remember being a wee kid, and doing some simple programming on an 80s Compaq behemoth as well. I had a floppy disk (5 1/4", of course) that held roughly 20-30 games on it. Nothing like launching up Frogger and staring at the miniscule 6"x6" green-monochrome screen for hours. I'm surprised I don't wear glasses today.

    Anyhow, imagine my surprise when I took a job a few years back, and noticed that we are using said Compaq as a status/communications monitor in one of our test machines.

    Good times.

  • by druske ( 550305 ) on Wednesday March 23, 2005 @12:30PM (#12024833)
    Here's an 1802 based handheld computer [ringcomps.co.uk] from 25 years ago, complete with specs and schematics.
  • Battery Life :-) (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Usquebaugh ( 230216 ) on Wednesday March 23, 2005 @12:32PM (#12024847)
    Where can I buy a notebook with > 8 hr battery life?

    I'd give up the CD/DVD, the color screen, the ghz proc. I'd give up most things to get a decent battery life. Now the ideal would be about 40hrs.

    Any ideas?

  • Batteries Anyone? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by RagingChipmunk ( 646664 ) on Wednesday March 23, 2005 @12:35PM (#12024887) Homepage
    Somewhat off topic, but, a neat side bar to the story would be "how long can you compute with out being plugged in".

    Seems that batteries havnt really improved much in the last 20 yrs. The only thing that seems to have greatly improved is power-consumption with better, low power chip designs.

    I wonder how long an old Apple ][e could run if it was re-designed with low power components? (not that I'd want to actually use it!) Could I run it for a couple days on flash-light batteries?

    Anyone have any info on how many amps the old "Lugable" PCs would draw?

  • Commodore SX-64 (Score:2, Interesting)

    by doppleganger871 ( 303020 ) <`nothanks' `at' `nocontact.org'> on Wednesday March 23, 2005 @12:37PM (#12024908) Homepage Journal
    Yep, I have two of these, actually. One I just purchased. They both are in 100% working order, though the first one has a home-made wood and aluminum handle on it, and I'm still looking for another keyboard cable. They both have JiffyDOS, and system reset buttons (to accompany the serial reset buttons). Great little machines. Was thinking about converting one to an internal LCD if I can do it without making any permanent mods to the inside of it.
  • Re:No TRS-80's? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by pilgrim23 ( 716938 ) on Wednesday March 23, 2005 @12:52PM (#12025130)
    I STILL use my Model 100! The battery life is- "all week and no problem", it is feather weight, and the keyboard is full sized. If you are working on a book, magazine article, or other text based work and do not need the distraction of email (now THAT is a distraction!), web, or other nonsense, it is just the ticket. The serial port is slow, but works great for transfering data to a modern machine. The current "do it all in a cell phone" aproach to computing seems to have missed one area: a simple, easy to use, light, text entry tool.
  • by NitsujTPU ( 19263 ) on Wednesday March 23, 2005 @01:25PM (#12025550)
    The IBM 5100 is the fav' of time travelers!

    Visit, http://www.johntitor.com/ [johntitor.com] to see why!

    That said, the reason he states is The 5100 has the ability to easily translate between the old IBM code, APL, BASIC and (with a few tweaks in 1975) UNIX.

    This makes little sense to me, it can translate between 2 languages and an operating system? Perhaps this is a hoax *grin* Still, hundreds have read this guys postings, and he has been the topic of coast2coast more than once. The inconsistencies in his story lead little credence to his claims, as for Art Bell's show, that's for you to decide.
  • Compaq SLuT (Score:3, Interesting)

    by cr0sh ( 43134 ) on Wednesday March 23, 2005 @01:34PM (#12025646) Homepage
    Well - that is what I call mine, anyhow - I think they are one of the more interesting laptop designs. The SLT was available as a 286 or 386 (286/SLT and 386/SLT, respectively) - I am not sure if they ever had color screens or not (mine has a bluish/blackish-grey and white LCD). The laptop portion has a handle, a floppy drive, and IIRC you could have up to 8 meg of RAM. All the ports on the back (serial/parallel/video) - no sound, though beyond the PC speaker. Plus an internal hard drive, of course. No such thing as expansion slots or a mouse, either.

    No idea what the original battery was like - I had to build my own battery from old cellphone ni-cads, and had to mod the case a bit to get it all to fit. I also managed to get the docking station (where you could add EISA cards and such). But the real treat was the keyboard...

    It was detatchable! You could detatch the keyboard and it had a cord so you could position it how you wanted. In reality, it used a PS/2-style mini-connector (not sure how compatible it really was with PS/2 stuff), so the keyboard was like a mini-keyboard of sorts.

    It was a great computer, and I played around with it and such a lot - even managed to use a form of Linux on it (my first Linux experience - it was Monkey Linux which ran on top of the DOS filesystem!)...

  • Memories. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by jhobbs ( 659809 ) * on Wednesday March 23, 2005 @01:37PM (#12025687)
    Another trip down memory lane. For good grades in 8th grade I recieved my first computer, an Epson Geneva PX-8 bought from a DAK catalog. I feel so old.
  • by soft_guy ( 534437 ) on Wednesday March 23, 2005 @01:43PM (#12025757)
    Not only that, but the Newton didn't really "bomb". They sold over 100,000 units in the first year - far more units than Apple IIs or Macs in their first years of introduction.

    The reason why so many people think it "bombed" was because they spent too long a time and too much money on R&D, they set their expectations too high, and later when the Palm Pilot entered the market, they looked bad by comparison. Before the Pilot came out, they were the best selling PDA by far.

  • by dimss ( 457848 ) on Wednesday March 23, 2005 @02:00PM (#12025952) Homepage
    > It wasn't until 1989 that someone had the bright idea that the power of a luggable and the portability of a laptop didn't have to be mutually exclusive.

    Ten years ago, I owned an old PC laptop manufactured in 1987. I don't remember its name but in was 8088 (4.77 MHz) equipped with 512k of RAM and 720k 3.5'' floppy drive. The last OS that worked on it was MS DOS 6.22. Qbasic was amazing :) Borland Turbo C and FoxBase worked too. Batteries were completely dead in 1996.
  • by feloneous cat ( 564318 ) on Wednesday March 23, 2005 @03:07PM (#12026846)
    Believe it or not, Apple had a laptop in 1984, aka year 0 of the Macintosh.

    It was called the Apple IIc and everyone that mentions the history of laptops seems to forget it.

    The Apple IIc can be seen in the movie "2010: Odyssey Two" which, by coincidence, also appeared in 1984.

    IIRC actor Roy Scheider is seen using it on a beach.
  • by Bent Mind ( 853241 ) on Wednesday March 23, 2005 @04:32PM (#12027947)
    An interesting article. Unfortunately, I found it to be very lacking. In 1992, I was a dirt poor college student. Strapped for cash, but needing a computer, I bought a KayPro portable computer. It had a 10MB hard drive and ran MS-DOS. Total cost at the time was $100.00 used. It was the first DOS-based computer I owned.

    It's also sad that the Atari Portfolio wasn't mentioned. I'm not sure when it actually sold (sometime between 1997 and 1989). However, at 15.87 ounces with batteries and running a DOS compatible operating system, I'd say this piece of technology should stand out! A bit of notoriety: It was used in Terminator 2 when John Connor hacked an ATM. Full specs can be found at old-computers.com [old-computers.com] with a nice blurb at atarimuseum.com [atarimuseum.com]
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 24, 2005 @12:40AM (#12032552)
    Nah, the 17" PowerBook is the worst. We have about 600 laptops at work, and the seven 17" ones we have are more trouble than the rest combined. The clutch (the hinge and friction catch that holds the monitor open) is not nearly strong enough to hold the huge screen open. I cracked my LCD after I tilted the laptop back just a little too far and the screen hit my engagement ring when it slammed close.

    The other *major* problem is the keyboard on the 17" ones. Apple still hasn't made a decent backlit keyboard, and you're not allowed to order non-backlit keyboards unless you buy in huge quantities. Also, Apple doesn't sell the keyboard as a repair part. That means you have to ship it back to them, pay the $300 for the part then pay about $300 more for the three hours labor they claim it takes to replace and wait 20-60 days depending on if they have backlit keyboards in stock, which they usually don't.

"I've seen it. It's rubbish." -- Marvin the Paranoid Android

Working...