AMD Launches Turion Mobile Processor 247
justforaday writes "Earlier today, AMD launched their Turion mobile processor, which is based on the AMD64 architecture. This is set to compete directly with Intel's Centrino (Pentium-M) line of processors. Chips will initially be clocked between 1.6 and 2.0 GHz. Looks like we should be seeing some nice low-powered 64-bit notebooks in the near future."
I'm Waiting For Benchmarks (Score:3, Insightful)
Intel / AMD = Microsoft / ??? (Score:5, Insightful)
No, I'm not saying that Intel is as bad as Microsoft (although those recent anti-trust actions might make one wonder). I'm just saying that look how well things have turned out for the consumer on the processor front because there's a viable alternative.
Wouldn't it be cool to have a competitor for Microsoft the way AMD competes with Intel?
Re:price points (Score:4, Insightful)
No. How long have you been following CPU pricing? It's always high for the first offerings. By this time next year you'll see half that line discontinued and the remainder heavily discounted.
Rule #1 regarding technology: As soon as it hits store shelves, it's already obsolete.
Silent computing applications (Score:5, Insightful)
My own wish would be to some day have a passively air cooled computer. Running an Athlon64 passively with only one big slow (=nearly silent) case fan is already feasible with carefully managed airflow inside the computer case. Turion could be theoretically cool enough to cool with convection airflow if the potential is realized with wellmade motherboards.
Re:Low Power? Better Link (Score:5, Insightful)
also remember than intel understates their peak power while amd overstates theirs. dont recall who did the test, i think it was the german c't mag who found the discrepancies between claimed and actual power consumption.
Hype64 (Score:1, Insightful)
But why the heck are they putting 64bit in a mobile computer? Well, we are living in a consuming world of almost two types: buy-and-throw-away and buy-although-you-don't-know-what's-it-good-for
How ridiculous..
1MB max of L2 cache - suckage (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Low Power? Better Link (Score:5, Insightful)
What? Peak use is 25W-35W. Pentium Ms use 22W, but then you also have a northbridge and a southbridge. Whereas most Athlon-64 based (and therefore Turion 64) have only one other chip (other than the CPU). At the least, they're about the same in terms of power usage.
Re:Hype64 (Score:3, Insightful)
It's not like AMD just said "hey, lets blow some smoke up the consumers arse and put a 64 bit processor in a laptop!". If you hadn't noticed they've been moving in this direction for say, a couple years now.
Re:1MB max of L2 cache - suckage (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Question (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:price points (Score:3, Insightful)
-Erwos
Re:kind of late? (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't see the value of cracking a laptop open while walking around or something [even a small one] cuz the likelyhood of dropping it [at least for me] is too high.
So I'm likely to have a plug available [even when I lug my american laptop to france for business for example...].
As for the issue of "amd not being portable" that's just lame. I've taken my AMD XP-M [barton like] based laptop pretty much all over. It's never "too much to carry" and comes in very handy.
I'm not saying pentium-m based laptops aren't cool they're just not that impressive. My brothers Pentium-M Compaq 2200 series laptop gets four hours on battery... so does my AMD XP-M Compaq 2100 series laptop...whoopy
What people still fail to understand that is at idle your motherboard, ram, screen and hard drive still take quite a bit of power.
Tom
Re:Question (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What I'm interested in... (Score:3, Insightful)
Logically, it'll be the same for the turion, so just take a normal mATX motherboard and that should be ok.
This is contrary to you can do with intel's p-M, which has a nice price premium and requires special expensive motherboards.