Comparison of Nine SATA RAID 5 Adapters - Slashdot

Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

×

Comparison of Nine SATA RAID 5 Adapters 221

Posted by CmdrTaco on Tuesday March 08, 2005 @12:16PM from the you-can-never-have-enough-storage-space dept.

Robbedoeske writes "Tweakers.net has put online a comparison of nine Serial ATA RAID 5 adapters. Can the establishment counter the attack of the newcomers? Which of the contestants delivers the best performance, offers the best value for money and has the best featureset?"

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Comparison of Nine SATA RAID 5 Adapters

Search 221 Comments Log In/Create an Account

Comments Filter:

Re:Eight or Nine? (Score:5, Funny)

by ackthpt ( 218170 ) * writes: on Tuesday March 08, 2005 @12:43PM (#11878082) Homepage Journal

TFA says nine adapters, but the graphic says eight, whoops.
It was a parity bit, ignore it.

Parent Share
twitter facebook
It had to be said (Score:1, Funny)

by Anonymous Coward writes: on Tuesday March 08, 2005 @01:11PM (#11878364)

Can the establishment counter the attack of the newcomers?
2000 Quatloos on the newcomers.

Share
twitter facebook
Re:Eight or Nine? (Score:3, Funny)

by hey! ( 33014 ) writes: on Tuesday March 08, 2005 @06:38PM (#11882285) Homepage Journal

No, I think we're suppose to reconstruct the ninth view from the other eight.

Parent Share
twitter facebook

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

Related Links Top of the: day, week, month.

613 commentsIs the Obsession with EV Range All Wrong?
463 commentsElon Musk Predicts Electricity Shortage in Two Years
438 commentsIs 8GB of RAM Enough For a Mac?
426 commentsWhat's the Solution to Gridlocked EV Chargers?
418 commentsWhy EVs Won't Crash the Electric Grid

FORTRAN is not a flower but a weed -- it is hardy, occasionally blooms, and grows in every computer. -- A.J. Perlis