Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Hardware

PDA Sales Fall for Third Year in Row 312

A reader writes "Reports ZDNet on how PDA sales have slipped for a third year in a row now at a five-year low." Anyone have numbers for sales of cell phones? My cell phone has almost every piece of functionality I got from my PDA 3 years ago. Plus a crappy camera. Still no dice roller.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

PDA Sales Fall for Third Year in Row

Comments Filter:
  • Yes but (Score:5, Insightful)

    by 2.7182 ( 819680 ) on Thursday February 03, 2005 @10:19AM (#11561606)
    It is a technology trend, noted by a study at UPenn that new technology almost always has a dip after its first big increase. So the jury is still out.
  • Not a suprise... (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Bolshoy Pimpovich ( 846605 ) on Thursday February 03, 2005 @10:19AM (#11561613)
    Laptops are shrinking, your iPod can store contacts and has a calendar, and mobile phones have the same functionality...

    not really a shock.

  • No Blackberrys? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by thewldisntenuff ( 778302 ) on Thursday February 03, 2005 @10:20AM (#11561622) Homepage
    TFA states that no Blackberry or Blackberry-like devices were counted.....Could this have pulled the numbers up?

    I think the line between pda/cell phone is starting to blur....Might as well have counted the Blackberry....Hell, you can do most of what you need to on a PDA on a cell phone these days. And they come free/relatively cheap with new service

    thewldisntenuff
  • by JamesD_UK ( 721413 ) on Thursday February 03, 2005 @10:22AM (#11561633) Homepage
    I've noticed that whilst maybe three years ago people would like to show off their latest PDA with all the latest features, now mobile phones appear to be the fashionable gadget that that people want to show off with all the latest wiz-bang features.

    Another thought is that modern mobile phones have more akin with PDAs (albiet in a different format package) than they do with older generation phones and that the 'phone' feature was the killer applications.

  • by gstoddart ( 321705 ) on Thursday February 03, 2005 @10:27AM (#11561683) Homepage
    This doesn't surprise me. I am selling my T3 Tungsten Palm right now, and it's because I just don't use it. I mean, I *want* to use it, or, more accurately, I want to *need* to use it, but it's just not something I keep with me constantly.


    I have found this with every variation on organizers, day-planners, scheduling software, etc. They're fun to look at and play with for a few days, and you try to convince yourself this time you'll actually use it.

    The reality is, some people (like me) just don't use that kind of organizing tool and it's just a gadget. I know a lot of people who don't/won't use any such critter. I figure except for a small fraction of people, most people simply do not need this kind of thing.

    Maybe they've already sold them to everyone who cares.

  • by treerex ( 743007 ) on Thursday February 03, 2005 @10:30AM (#11561711) Homepage

    When the PalmPilot came out I found that it could do 90% of what I could do on my Newton in a smaller package. I was using Grafiti on my Newton anyway, so it didn't make sense to keep using it.

    Then I stopped taking notes on the Palm and just used it for calendar and contacts. One more thing to remember to take with me.

    Now I can sync my (iCal) calendars and my address book to my iPod. I take that little white gem with me pretty much everywhere anyway, and it's doing 80-90% of what my PalmPilot did. And it "just works" on my Mac OS X box.

    So it isn't a surprise that this is happening: few people really need to read and write email on the Blackberry. Can you not be disconnected for a few minutes a day?

  • by AKnightCowboy ( 608632 ) on Thursday February 03, 2005 @10:32AM (#11561737)
    I've found that I never use my Palm anymore. It sits on the cradle for months at a time whereas I got through 2 or 3 of those yellow sticky notepad things a month. If I need to write something down I find a sheet of paper with some unused space and jot down a note. Who needs a $500 PDA for that???
  • Re:because (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Glock27 ( 446276 ) on Thursday February 03, 2005 @10:35AM (#11561768)
    The only way this can be achieved is with a total rewrite or replacement of PocketPC/WindowsCE

    It's called "PalmOS". PalmSource has announced a future version will be based on Linux, which is exciting.

    Now if someone will just build some compelling hardware... :-)

    Wearable devices are a dark horse in all this also, and might make a better base for converged comm/computer functionality (since you can comfortably carry bigger batteries that way).

  • by sczimme ( 603413 ) on Thursday February 03, 2005 @10:36AM (#11561786)

    Simplication, in the world of gadgets, unfortunately means using a single, do-it-all device.

    That will simplify one's cartage/storage needs - using one device is pretty straightforward, after all - but can very easily complicate other aspects.

    I carry a laptop, a PDA (Clie), and a mobile phone. I don't need all of them all the time, so I carry what is necessary. However, if one item goes south I will still have the other two. If the all-in-one device breaks it becomes an all-are-gone. I find this unacceptable - YMMV.

    Small all-in-one devices also frequently suffer from substandard input options and user interfaces. A fair compromise might be a PDA/phone device with an optional full-size (e.g. folding) keyboard, but that still leaves the user with the risk of losing all functionality with one mishap.
  • by johnpaul191 ( 240105 ) on Thursday February 03, 2005 @10:37AM (#11561788) Homepage
    you figure a lot of people that were happy to carry a Palm Pilot may have upgraded to a Treo (or one of the other Palm OS phones) and those do not count as PDA sales either.....

    i have not carried my Palm in a few years, but if i was still willing to deal with the bulk of it i would have gotten a Treo already. my cell phone is not all that smart, but it keeps more contact info than just phone number, schedule, memo pad (to do list, shopping lists) and some other stupid things. i miss the Palm OS and the bonus apps.... but i do not miss the size of it.
  • by DarKry ( 847943 ) <darkryNO@SPAMdarkry.net> on Thursday February 03, 2005 @10:40AM (#11561824) Homepage Journal
    Marketing strategy for Palm:

    Build in a damn phone already.
  • by pdbogen ( 596723 ) <tricia-slashdot@ce r n u.us> on Thursday February 03, 2005 @10:42AM (#11561852)
    Interestingly enough, you just indicated that your iPod only does 72-81% of what your Newton did...
  • No surprise (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Mr_Silver ( 213637 ) on Thursday February 03, 2005 @10:42AM (#11561854)
    I don't work in IT so it generally means that I spend more time in meetings than quite a lot of people here - as such, I heavily rely on a diary, something that syncs with Outlook, can be easily modified on the go and means that my secretary can access and modify the information on it.

    Therefore it isn't much of a surprise than standalone PDA's are dying when my current pda/phone combo [typepad.com] is nearly the same size as a Nokia 7610 [nokia.com] and comes with a decent input method (which always was the killer issue with using a standard phone pad to enter details), sends and receieves phone calls/sms/mms and works as a PocketPC with a large base of useful applications. A Nokia simply doesn't cut it and the SonyEricsson P9xx is only discounted because it's syncing with Outlook isn't particulary great (especially with the categorisation of tasks and notes).

    A friend of mine is selling his iPaq after getting a Blackberry from work. Sure it doesn't have a NES emulator, PocketScumm and a few other of the niceties - but it does everything he needs.

    I'm going to really hate having to give this back.

  • by Doc Ruby ( 173196 ) on Thursday February 03, 2005 @10:51AM (#11561971) Homepage Journal
    another report [mobilizedsoftware.com], from Canalys, shows that the recent trend is over 100% growth (doubling) in smartphones, while "PDAs" without phones shrank by about 5%. So clearly the trend is a transition to smartphones, rather than "PDAs are dying" - smartphones are PDAs, too. IDC's report is phrased to make Blackberry look good, without even mentioning their #1 competitor, Palm, which is the leader in the PDA/smartphone dual marketplace. #1 smartphone seller Nokia is surfing the same wave. But the real story, that PDAs, and Palm, have transitioned to smartphones, is the kind of story that the mainstream media missed when networking happened to PCs in the early 1990s. While the media was fascinated by their favorite corporate success, Microsoft's desktop rise, they all missed the Internet. Perhaps a similar benevolent neglect will help give the mobile Web the element of surprise when it delivers its own killer apps in the next couple of years.
  • by mausmalone ( 594185 ) on Thursday February 03, 2005 @10:51AM (#11561975) Homepage Journal
    I say this in all seriousness, and I will be flamed for it.... but if somebody writes a phonebook/notepad/general PDA program for the Nintendo DS that supports WiFi e-mail and AIM/Yahoo Messenger/MSN/ICQ, I would buy it in a heartbeat (and a DS for that matter). As much as I like PDA's in general, it's not as constantly useful as gaming to me.
  • Listen to Apple (Score:3, Insightful)

    by SamSeaborn ( 724276 ) on Thursday February 03, 2005 @10:55AM (#11562005)
    This is another example of how Apple is *so* on top of market trends.

    A couple years back (and even today!) people whined about how Apple should make a PDA -- bring back the Newton, or whatever. Steve Jobs repeatedly said Apple isn't interested in that market; now we see why.

    Sam

  • by Drakonite ( 523948 ) on Thursday February 03, 2005 @11:07AM (#11562135) Homepage
    I'm sure all the geeks here have a hard time grasping the idea, but for the majority of people who need and buy PDAs they aren't looking to upgrade every other week and be forced to reenter a million pieces of information. They want to buy the one PDA that does what they need and stick with it for as long as possible.

    So how is it surprising that sales have dropped now that 99% of those people have their PDAs?

  • by gelfling ( 6534 ) on Thursday February 03, 2005 @11:53AM (#11562626) Homepage Journal
    Seriously my phone costs $0. My Palm is quite old but I could replace it for less than $200 bucks. If I want those functions in my phone I have to pay AT LEAST twice that amount. On the other hand there are already crude features like that in my phone but no way to connect them to my PC or any other service I can think of.

    I mean how many of you have a cheap candy bar or flip phone that has an obscure data port connector in the bottom that no one can describe to you what it does or sell you a cable of any kind that will connect to it? Let alone show you some software that will at least sync to a Palm desktop or something quick and dirty?

    I bet the numbers are huge.

    On the other hand I think that people are discovering that PDAs are for the most part unusable devices on their own. Everyone has struggled for years with Graffiti, T9, Fitaly and all the others. Data entry just sucks. And when you're done entering data, then what? Are you really going to trade your stock portfolio i real time with one? Are you really going to bust out that Powerpoint presentation?

    Nah, you're going to browse the sports pages, the weather report, CNN and that's about it besides some games.

    So PDS sales are decreasing because PDA function really hasn't increased in 5 years. We're still limited in the same ways doing the same halfassed things we were doing 5 years ago.

    I'll tell you what I use my PDA for: Avantgo, the address book, a DB of passwords and special calendars I need. Everything else is a waste of time.

    But - if phone companies could provide this level of functionality I'd dump my PDA in a second. Even with the smaller screen and reduced battery life.
  • Re:Yes but (Score:2, Insightful)

    by nharmon ( 97591 ) on Thursday February 03, 2005 @12:25PM (#11562987)
    But then again it happened to CB's, which never recovered and turned out to be a fad.

    You don't consider the popularity of FRS and GMRS radios as being the CB's second coming?
  • by Java Ape ( 528857 ) <mike,briggs&360,net> on Thursday February 03, 2005 @01:47PM (#11564000) Homepage
    LOL! I am the laughing stock of WSU, where I'm working on an M.S. in computer science. EVERYONE has a laptop, and most of them play games or chat during lecture. I bring a $0.75 spiral notebook and a pencil, just like when I was a kid.

    It works surprisingly well -- I get highly-formatted text, including greek and cyrillic characters as needed. I can reproduce complex drawings, including simple gray-scale shading. In shorthand mode, I can capture output in near real time, and in high-quality output mode other students can generally read my notes. Pretty amazing things, these pencils.

    I watched a fellow student using both thumbs to frantically poke tic-tac sized buttons on his PDA's integrated keyboard, and offered him a piece of paper and a spare pencil. "No way", he said, "this is a $500 PDA!". Sigh.

No man is an island if he's on at least one mailing list.

Working...