Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Hardware

The CPU: From Conception to Birth 179

CrzyP writes "Most of us have seen flowcharts and heard lectures on how a CPU functions in a computer. What a lot of us do not know, however, is how a CPU is created. Sudhian describes the step-by-step process of how a CPU is made, from grains of sand to a wafer of circuits. Ahhh sand, the building block of life...in the tech world!"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The CPU: From Conception to Birth

Comments Filter:
  • by xmas2003 ( 739875 ) on Saturday November 06, 2004 @12:08AM (#10740240) Homepage
    Site is getting pretty doggy ... here is the obligatory link to the Google Cache [66.102.7.104]
  • Oh, duh. (Score:2, Informative)

    by RealProgrammer ( 723725 ) on Saturday November 06, 2004 @12:10AM (#10740246) Homepage Journal

    The link [sudhian.com] works. Just a browser fart. Never mind.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 06, 2004 @12:21AM (#10740276)
    It's fairly short and pretty generalized. Lots of pretty pictures though.

    A quick search on Google ("silicon fabrication introduction") turns up arguably better links.

    One from SGS Thompson [eteonline.com]
    A basic one from Intel [intel.com]
    From Bell Labs [bell-labs.com]

    And there are plenty more.
  • So dull... (Score:2, Informative)

    by TiMac ( 621390 ) on Saturday November 06, 2004 @12:23AM (#10740281)
    The author blurs sentences together like a 6 year old child might, using the same sentence construction over and over sometimes. It's certainly not a FUN read, but has some interesting info in it.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 06, 2004 @12:44AM (#10740350)
    Remember... Like I told my mom to keep her from getting the two confused:

    siliCON is for chips, siliCONE is for tits!
  • mod up! (Score:0, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 06, 2004 @01:13AM (#10740438)
    I'd forgotten about this site. Funny as fuck.
  • Re:So dull... (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 06, 2004 @01:43AM (#10740494)
    From what I understand, he's French, and English is not his first language. May want to cut him a little slack based on that. ;)
  • by Fiz Ocelot ( 642698 ) <baelzharonNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Saturday November 06, 2004 @01:44AM (#10740497)
    I've seen a lot of cores and it seems that most of them are of a dull or silvery color; but some are more of a green/amber shiney look. So what explains that exactly? Nothing at all?

    About a year ago I bought a couple xp 1700s that overclocked amazingly high, obviously a high quality processor set aside for selling in the lower end market. It also was the green/amber shiney color.

  • by Animats ( 122034 ) on Saturday November 06, 2004 @02:15AM (#10740560) Homepage
    There's a classic set of five books, Build Your Own Metalworking Shop from Scrap [lindsaybks.com], by Dave Gingery, written in the 1970s. This set covers how to bootstrap up a machine shop starting from very little.

    Step one is to make a charcoal foundry, starting with a pail, fire clay, and a steel pipe. With this you can cast parts. You hand-carve wooden masters, make sand moulds, and pour molten metal into them.

    Once you can cast, the next step is to build a lathe - the simplest machine tool. You'd probably have to make a very crude lathe first, but once you have even a crude lathe, you can make round things. Then you can make a better lathe.

    The next tool is a shaper, or planer, which allows you to make flat things. You're now up to the machining technology of 1850 or so, and can make small steam engines. Take a look at a steam locomotive. It's all castings with a little finish machining. All the finish machining is either lathe or planer work - there are no milled parts with complex surfaces.

    The other early power tool, not mentioned in Gingery, is a steam hammer. You don't need that for small work, but the steam hammer is the tool that made it possible to make stuff too big to hammer out by hand. Watt's factory had a steam hammer by 1810 or so.

    Once you have the lathe and planer, you can build, with difficulty, a milling machine. Once you have a milling machine, you can build more milling machines without too much trouble. And you can build a better mill than the one you've got.

    Once you have a good mill, you can make almost anything makeable in metal.

    People have built machine tools from these books, so it's quite possible.

  • by taped2thedesk ( 614051 ) on Saturday November 06, 2004 @03:06AM (#10740648)
    Here [embedded.com] is a slightly better written article on the same topic...
  • Lame... (Score:3, Informative)

    by sharkb8 ( 723587 ) on Saturday November 06, 2004 @04:38AM (#10740850)
    This is one of the lamest, most oversimplified explanations I've seen in a long time. I think I read this in high school physics.

    For example, sand is not melted in a quartz bucket to make an ingot. Sand is Si02, or quartz. THe bucket would melt, and you;'d have an ingot full of Si and 02. Sand is made into gaseous silcon, called silane gas, which is then allowed to crystallize into a solid, chunks of which are melted in a quartz bucket.
  • by Bender_ ( 179208 ) on Saturday November 06, 2004 @05:17AM (#10740941) Journal
    The same published also has another interesting book:
    Instruments of Amplification [lindsaybks.com] that describes how to make your own electronic and electromechanical amplifiers from scratch. Great addition if you have to restart civilization on your own!
  • by Jay-Lo ( 828722 ) on Saturday November 06, 2004 @05:57AM (#10741007)

    The green/amber part you were looking at may have been a protective coating applied when the microprocessor was packaged. Regardless, microfabricated chips can indeed be technicolored marvels.

    Most materials used in microfabrication are either transparent (insulating layers) or grey (metallization), but resulting devices can appear coloured due to optical interference [fsu.edu]. Colours present in structures of a microfabricated device are related to the thickness and composition of the patterned thin-film coatings that form the device. For a single thin film, thickness can be determined from, for example, the Michel-Lévy interference colour chart [microscopyu.com] if the birefringence of the thin film material is known. Variations in colour across a film indicate non-uniform thickness. The colour resulting from several layers of patterned thin-films is more complex to predict, but the same basic principles apply.

  • Some mistakes... (Score:3, Informative)

    by curious.corn ( 167387 ) on Saturday November 06, 2004 @08:30AM (#10741220)

    Although it's a neat effort to explain some engineering & physics to the avg case modder running XP & windowblinds (;-)) there's an initial nasty mistake:

    The new wafers are then taken and doped appropriately for the type of transistors that will be made out of them. Doping amounts to depositing other elements into the space between silicon atoms. This is what causes silicon to be the "semiconductor" that it is. Transistors today are made from "CMOS" technology, or Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductors. Complementary means the interaction of "n" and "p" MOS

    No, no... doping is about getting impurities inside the Si lattice substituting some of the Si atoms. The whole concept is: electron energy levels of a single atom becoming thick bands for hoards of electrons to fly within; if the next band is empty & close enough to the last full band you have an "intrinsic" semic. Doping the crystal means to get other atoms (P) into the lattice so that their electrons are weakly tied and readily bumped into the conduction band (@ room temp); or you plug greedy B into the lattice so that it grabs an e- all for itself leaving some other Si without and a roaming Hole inside the last full band...Leaving doping atoms wedged inside the lattice without participating to the whole electron/lattice exchange doesn't do anything good, perhaps it just deforms the reticle creating all sorts of defects & a useless brick of solid sand

    Overall this article lacks a lot of geek factor... there's so many "cool" catchy words and processes like Silicon Over Insulator, Damascene Process, dovetail prevention, SiN and SuperK dielectric... bah, it could have been a LOT better... have a look in ars [arstechnica.com]
  • by Thomic ( 793502 ) on Saturday November 06, 2004 @08:33AM (#10741228)
    I know that diamond cutter is used for dicing. Actually have done that personnally. Our gadget will remove about 200nm (width) silicon.
  • by blether ( 817276 ) on Saturday November 06, 2004 @11:08AM (#10741593)
    HF = hydrofluoric acid
  • When you are talking about where to get some extra watts of power, there are a couple of source to consider:

    • Horsepower - I'm not kidding here either. This is why the term is still used for power measurements, because it was commonly used in the past. The neat thing about horses is that horse begat more horses, and all you need is a little grass and water. Oats and salt help to make healthier horses, as does good vetinary care, but that is just a refinement of the basics. If you are talking trying to bootstrap industrial processes, a good horse is not something to ignore.
    • Mills - A good mill can be constructed from only wood and rough stone, and very common sources of power to turn the mill came from water (the traditional water wheel) and wind. In fact, wind mills are coming back into vogue, but in the case of water (hydropower plants) and wind, the trick is to get the energy away from the areas where it is found to where you need it. Many early factories used belts to turn lathes or other equipment, with the energy derived from the turning water wheel. It was finally after the steam engine was invented that you could build a factory far from a reliable water "power source". Still, even in the late 19th Century it was still easier to build a dam and tap water energy from a river for basic mechanical energy needs (like grinding up wheat for flour) than it was to try and import a steam engine, at least if you lived in frontier areas.
    • Slaves - While I am not advocating this directly, one of the major economic incentives for slavery was due to the fact that if you needed lots of people to accomplish a simple task, you had slaves do it for you. In ancient times they were usually conquored enemies. With the invention of the modern horse harness, it became cheaper to use horses instead of slaves for most tasks (like plowing agriculture fields and pulling or pushing a bar connected to a turnshaft). I will say, however, that if you go this route times must be very desperate indeed.


    Still, just as you've mentioned, you can trade technology for labor, and you quickly discover why manufacturing processes in the past were so labor intensive for comparatively little actual product being produced.
  • by antispam_ben ( 591349 ) on Saturday November 06, 2004 @12:23PM (#10741849) Journal
    First the misleading part:

    CrzyP writes "Most of us have seen flowcharts and heard lectures on how a CPU functions in a computer. What a lot of us do not know, however, is how a CPU is created.

    I swear I envisioned decisions of how many registers to do what, what the instruction set should include, pipelining, hardwired vs. microprogramming, etc. Insteresting Stuff, at least to this nerd.

    BUT NOOOOOO, it's about:

    Sudhian describes the step-by-step process of how a CPU is made, from grains of sand to a wafer of circuits.

    It's about Semiconductor Physics, and has no special relation to CPU's any more than it does to RAM, IC Op-Amps, RF amplifiers or LED's. Okay, CPU's and RAM are a little different, unlike the others, they are made as dense as possible.

    Then I actually read TFA, and I have to agree with other comments, it's a grammar-school general-technology lesson: Listen Up, boyz and girlz, Computers are made from Sand!

    I've seen lots better stuff in the obligatory semiconductor-physics first chapter of any transistor circuits analysis book from the past 50 or more years. Of course that chapter was like the Venn diagrams that start out many high school math books, very few readers would ever actually use the info in a later class or in a career.

    For some Real Info, I recall a "The Amateur Scientist" column from late-60's or early 70's Scientific American that described making "thin-film transistors" - surely not the quality of a commercial 2-cent 2N2222, but something that has gain.

    Or even the Smithsonian Magazine article on an Intel manufacturing plant, ISTR the cover had someone in a bunny suit holding a wafer. It wasn't even about the chips themselves, but about the evolution of the clean room, and factoids about the waterfall process to clean the air - did you know the air in clean rooms is completely replaced three times a minute? Not a lot of Real Technical stuff, but still more informative than TFA.
  • by Bender_ ( 179208 ) on Saturday November 06, 2004 @12:39PM (#10741906) Journal
    Its the evil thing in a chipfab. Everybody talks about HF and is afraid of coming near or getting exposed. A chemist would probably say: "Dont touch", thats it.

    There are many other dangerous substances in a chip fab like silan, arsin, phosphin, chlourtriflouride (now thats nasty). But all over all the amount is pretty low and everything is sealed of insanely well. It is much more dangerous to work in a chemical plant.
  • by rah1420 ( 234198 ) <rah1420@gmail.com> on Saturday November 06, 2004 @04:29PM (#10742942)
    I used to work at Lucent's Micro fab in Allentown PA. The supply lines for the "scary stuff" were all encased in coaxial lines filled with inert gas at higher than atmospheric pressure, so that you'd have to breach both lines to have an "incident."

    I too have heard that it's the most evil 30 seconds of life that you'll ever finish with, but of course there were never any problems with that crap.

    They had enough problems selling enough chips to keep me employed, and in that they failed miserably.

Your computer account is overdrawn. Please reauthorize.

Working...