NEC Strikes Back With SX-8 Supercomputer 192
News for nerds writes "It was just 3 weeks ago that we learned IBM's BlueGene/L with 36.01 TFlops edged out NEC's Earth Simulator, but today NEC announces a new SX-8 supercomputer with a peak processing performance of 65 TFlops (press release). It may be available in the U.S. as Cray's OEM like SX-6."
It's like (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Real-world applications? (Score:3, Insightful)
65 TFlop is only an estimate (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:It's like (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes because this sort of computing power holds no attraction to the military for weapon modeling purposes or to the untouchables running echelon type programs.
Re:65 TFlop is only an estimate (Score:1, Insightful)
Also, the performance per-CPU and per-node is most likely real data, as they say the SX-8 would ship in December.
Re:I'd stick with IBM (Score:4, Insightful)
LLNL does nuclear research (basically simulating nuclear weapon detonations). We spend $400 Billion on defense per year, what is $200 - $300 million for the latest and greatest super-computer?
Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:65 TFlop is only an estimate (Score:5, Insightful)
An equally important criticism is that they've only announced the POSSIBILITY of building a 65TF system. No one has actually ordered one. The cray X1 can scale up to 50TF if fully populated. The X1E scales up to 150TF. This is of no great consequence, as the largest one in production is only 10TF. Yes they could build a really big sx-8, but it cost $200M to build the earth simulator, probably something similar to build this thing.
There are a lot of computers that are really cool - on paper.
Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 (Score:3, Insightful)
We have more than sufficient computer power on our desktops to do the maths needed for a designing something like SpaceShip One. What's killing the startups isn't lack of cash, but lack of experience (both individually and across the industry) needed to make valid and rational engineering tradeoffs. (Not to mention that they aren't building for a market, but in hope of a market, thus making the design/tradeoff process even harder. Nobody knows what to design *to*.)