Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Portables IBM Hardware IT

IBM Introduces Biometric Thinkpad 195

An anonymous reader writes "IBM has added biometric security to its thinkpad notebooks. The next generation of T series thinkpads will have an integrated fingerprint scanner for added security. The latest machines will also include some pretty cool encryption software, that will keep your hard disk safe, but still let you backup and restore images. This guy managed to get his hands on an early prototype T42 with the new security features integrated."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

IBM Introduces Biometric Thinkpad

Comments Filter:
  • IBM is pretty cool (Score:3, Insightful)

    by zoloto ( 586738 ) on Monday October 04, 2004 @12:52PM (#10430243)
    I was just at their website configuring a laptop for a business purchace. While I have to say their range of laptops are pretty slick their UI designer should be shot.

    Back on topic now, this laptop is nifty in itself. EArlier on another /. article, the hordes were in an uproar about the data security module in laptops. After seeing one on the website and with technical information, both the prior articles mentioning and this new biometric feature are for the purpose of protecting the users data from theft and not for "corporations" protection against "us". It wasn't engineered that way. Maybe in a few years that will happen, but to appease the paranoid crowd here - this is _FOR_ us. not against.

    =) happy /.ing
  • Re:swipe scan (Score:5, Insightful)

    by saderax ( 718814 ) on Monday October 04, 2004 @12:53PM (#10430251)
    ...except for the multitude of partial prints left all over the keyboard and the touchpad...
  • Yes, but... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ProudClod ( 752352 ) on Monday October 04, 2004 @12:54PM (#10430258)
    Can it be fooled simply and easily by a piece of jelly [puttyworld.com], like most fingerprint scanners on the market. Surely you can drag the jelly across.
  • by DHalcyon ( 804389 ) <lorenzd AT gmail DOT com> on Monday October 04, 2004 @12:54PM (#10430266)
    When I break my Finger? I need my files, you know...
  • False security (Score:5, Insightful)

    by GraWil ( 571101 ) on Monday October 04, 2004 @12:56PM (#10430283)
    This is nothing more than false security for pointy haired induhviduals. A clueful cracker with console access can usually get access to data. If the laptop is stolen, so is the data and no fingerprint widget will prevent it.
    But what makes SafeGuard Easy so special is that it works with IBM's own Rescue and Recovery utility. The problem with encrypted data is that when you try to restore an image of an encrypted hard drive, all the data, including the boot records just look like garbage to the restore program. But with SafeGuard Easy, you can keep the entire contents of your drive encrypted, and still be safe in the knowledge that should your hard disk crash, you can restore all your data to a new drive despite the fact that it's encrypted.
    Has anyone here used or admined IBM's lotus notes? I feel real good about trusting IBM with my encrypted HD.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 04, 2004 @12:56PM (#10430290)
    To stop the casual snooper? Screensaver passwords do that already.

    If the thief has physical access to the machine, nothing short of encryption is going to prevent him or her from getting at your data.
  • by stratjakt ( 596332 ) on Monday October 04, 2004 @12:58PM (#10430317) Journal
    Yesterday when mikey announced IBM would be shipping more computers with "trusted" technologies, you all cried and threw a fit about it.

    Now some of that hardware is reviewed and you can't get over how neato it is.

    What about "your rights online" people!?
  • by trisight ( 306703 ) on Monday October 04, 2004 @01:08PM (#10430446) Homepage
    Am I the only one that sees where this can lead? How long will it take to condition people to use these things before they come mandatory in computers and have to be used.. most especially what if they become mandatory for internet connections.. I'm sure the RIAA and the MPAA would just love that..

    This is what happens.. they give you a wolf in sheeps clothing.. and for awhile that wolf stays dorment and you like it and you pet .. it's naughty.. it's a naughty little sheep.. and then all of a sudden .. oh my GOD WE'VE BEEN SUED.. WE'VE BEEN SUED AND THROWN INTO JAIL.. ahem.. maybe not.. but still.. I worry about companies doing things like this.
  • by dreadfire ( 781564 ) on Monday October 04, 2004 @01:11PM (#10430486) Homepage
    In theory and from what I have read on the article, it will be a great device for security. But I don't think people will really realize how annoying this feature will become. If it gets damaged, no more using computer. If you get a nice little scare on the finger you choose to scan, no more using comptuer (unless of course you add more than one finger, but still). I guess this is one of those things that the government should use, I don't know how easy or useful it would be used for a personal use computer.
  • by dr_dank ( 472072 ) on Monday October 04, 2004 @01:46PM (#10430983) Homepage Journal
    When I break my Finger? I need my files, you know...

    Sounds like a good pretense for Social Engineering ones way into such a system.
  • So many critics... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by nunley ( 760422 ) * on Monday October 04, 2004 @02:13PM (#10431349) Homepage
    I am the guy they quoted in the original press release. I have one of these babies in my hands and let me tell you... pretty cool stuff.

    My 2 cents...

    The fingerprint reader is of a type that has not been 'fooled' yet. Yes, contact readers are easy to fool. This is not a contact reader. It reads the capacitive properties of the ridges and valleys that make up your finger print. This is actually quite cool since a severed finger does not have the same capacitive properties, and the reading is of live tissue *under* the skin, not your dead skin at the surface. So, a minor injury isn't going to be a big deal and the mafia cannot cut your finger off and use it. Furthermore, the extra small footprint of the reader is nice because there is less opportunity to damage the reader with scratches.

    The idea is to register more than one finger and fingers from both hands. Of course, nothing is foolproof, but the idea here was to include a low cost yet effective way to provide biometric access control to the laptop. The embedded security system (ESS) protects a lot of things including a password vault. Password vaults have their drawbacks, the most obvious of which is if you have the 'master' password, you now have *all* of the passwords that user has stored in the vault. Average users tend to use simple master passwords, making the password vault a huge risk. This is a way to provide the functional equivalent of a strong password to unlock the vault without making the user have to remember a complicated password or some hardware key.

    I am very impressed with the entire package. I think it will make it much simpler for IT to deploy things like ESS without destroying all of the value in ESS because users choose crappy passwords. There are a number of add-ons that make it very appropriate for enterprise deployment, including centralized key storage and disaster recovery software.

    My biggest problem to date with this kind of software was it hasn't been real reliable in the recovery category. I could make it very secure, but God help me if I had a hard drive crash or an OS go belly up. The 'backups' of this data were often times 'too secure' to be recovered. This latest package of hardware/software has many of the previous holes filled in and I am happy to report success in all of the tests I have conducted so far.

    Of course, anybody can implement this poorly. However, IBM has done a stellar job with it this time. I feel privileged to get to play with stuff like this.

    -Shawn
  • by accelleron ( 790268 ) on Monday October 04, 2004 @03:27PM (#10432226)
    "The scanner only stores a tiny amount of data for each fingerprint, just enough to ensure an accurate match"

    Unless I'm an idiot, this means that the amount of data the scanner stores is inversely proportional to its accuracy. For example, if one were to store a critical 20% of the data neccessary to recreate a fingerprint, with use of the partials on the keyboard and the top of the laptop, one should be able to recreate the print accurately enough using means like a laser (3d) printer, a bit of spare rubber, and anything with a curved surface. Since the scanner is not 100% accurate, it would confirm, anyway.

    Besides, this laptop defeats its own purpose. How difficuilt would it be for someone to make a 1:1 image of the hard drive and decrypt it. Or, if you were pressed on time for the encryption, simply to pop the hood,remove the box, and emulate a 'success' signal with use of a relatively simple circuit, something one could construct in an hour with a soldering iron and proper documentation.

    All in all, this is a fun toy, but oh so useless.

And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions. -- David Jones

Working...