Overclockers Top 6GHz With A 3.6GHz-Rated P4 421
sH4RD writes "The 6GHz barrier has been broken by two guys, a little LN2 (liquid nitrogen for those not as chemistry inclined), and an Intel Pentium 4 (Prescott) 3.60GHz. Check out some icing and some proof of speed. Better yet take a look at how fast it calculates pi. Also be sure to check out the original announcement."
Don't forget the dual clocked ALU (Score:4, Informative)
Welcome to measuring your operations in picoseconds.
Re:Only 5.4GHz (Score:5, Informative)
Not bench stable - just a screenshot record
The CPU powersupply seems to require quite a bit of modding in order to bench past 5.4GHz.
LN2 ? Try some LHe! (Score:2, Informative)
Heh. (Score:3, Informative)
I've got a 3.02 ghz, mildly overclocked, and the fan shutting down and the board automatically shutting down due to high heat are nearly simultaneous.
Re:Erm... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Erm... (Score:5, Informative)
The first Pentium 4 CPU was slow compared with a P3 1 GHz. One would belive that a 1.5GHz CPU would beat the last generations 1 GHz CPU, but in many tasks the P3 was faster.
-The P3 pipeline had 12 stages the P4 had 20.
-The P3 Katmai had 512k L2 cache, the P4 had only 256k. I remember some MySQL benchmarks showing a single P3 500 MHz Katmai beating a P4 1400 MHz in some tasks.
So even with all the IDE stuff enabled a Dual P3 could be faster than a P4 in Gentooing.
Re:Hang one outside the ISS !! (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Erm... (Score:5, Informative)
+7.3, informationativinal (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/memory/display/o
Re:liquid nitrogen sucks (Score:5, Informative)
Liquid nitrogen boils at -195.8 degrees C, which is cold enough to freeze propane into a solid (there's a fun experiment for you). Further, liquid nitrogen is not flammable, and presents no hazards other than asphyxiation and freeze damage. Nitrogen already makes up 80% of the air we breathe, so unless one works in an enclosed space with plenty of NL2 boiling off, it's tough to die from asphyxiation.
In other words, LN2 is colder, and won't blow up on you. I've used it for years, and have yet to get hurt by it. A little respect goes a long way.
The Calculation (Score:2, Informative)
I think you'll find that the fins are to increase surface area for the purposes of convection. Convection of course dominates radiative transfers in a fluid like air.
As for radiative cooling in space, a quick ball park calculation is quite educational:
Objects emit radiation depending on their temperature, according to Stefan's law. They also absorb radiation from their surroundings according to the same equation, hence we can express the following formula for net power emitted as
P_net = {sigma}*A*e*(T^4 - T_0^4)
Here {sigma} is the stefan-boltzmann constant, 5.67e-8 W/(M^2*K^4), A the surface area of the object. T is the temperature of the object, and T_0 that of the background. e is the emissivity of the object, which we will assume to be 1 (perfect blackbody).
I saw a photo of the thermometer displaying -46 deg C(=227 K), and standard Pentium 4 3GHz apparently consume about 80 watts of power. We'll therefore assume that the madly overclocked P4 produces 200W of heat. The question is then, what area of radiator is required to maintain the chip's temperature, given that the temperature of deep space is about 3K (cosmic background radiation)?
A = P_net / ( {sigma} *(T^4 - T_0^4) )
= 200 / (5.67e-8 * (230^4 - 3^4) )
~= 1.3 m^2
An area of 1.3 m^2 corresponds to a sphere of radius 30cm. Conclusion: Put the chip in good thermal contact with a well-emitting sphere big enough to contain the chip and motherboard, and it'll probably be fine.
Re:Alienware's next product. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:What's that plugged in the DIMM slot? (Score:2, Informative)
Nah, LH makes for some serious problems. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Just in time... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Erm... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Even colder... (Score:4, Informative)
BTW, which is it... are we mounting it in a vaccuum or under liquid helium
Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. (Score:1, Informative)
Re:calculate pi... (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Pi has been slashdotted (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Just in time... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Don't forget the dual clocked ALU (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Mod parent as clueless (Score:3, Informative)
It is possible that we are talking about different things. I think of a digit extractor as something which will let you calculate the nth digit without having to calculate any other digits.
Mathworld mistakenly called this equasion a "digit extraction algorythm" and this is a mistake IMO because the equasion still requires that you calculate every preceding digit. This is because the portion of the equasion before the (1/(16^x)) will not produce whole numbers, even in hex. The numbers are less than 0 and therefore must be calculated before the next digit. Does this make sense?
The problem is that for any value of x where x > 0, 4/(8x+1) - 2/(8x+4) - 1/(8x+5) - 1/(8x+6) always yields a fraction whose denominator is *not* a power of 2 and hence not a power of 16. So you end up with a value which does not exactly correspond to any single digit in pi (even in hex).
Now this equasion is very helpful because I could write a program to calculate n digits of pi in hex and speed things up by shifting values off when they are no longer needed for active calculation. But it will *not* allow me to calculate the thirty-four billion 396 millionth decimal of pi without calculating all prior places.