HP Terminates Itanium Workstations 472
vincecate writes "The largest Itanium system maker,
HP, has terminated its Itanium workstations.
It seems their workstation customers have spoken in favor of x64.
In related news, Intel expects to ship
over 100,000 Itaniums in all of 2004
while AMD is estimating
1.5 to 2 million AMD64 chips in Q4."
The good news (Score:5, Funny)
x64? (Score:4, Funny)
Top 10 (Score:5, Funny)
10. HP decided that they didn't want to go down with the Itanic
9. Hear that flushing sound? That's billions of dollars being invested into a lemon.
8. HP must of realized it was a 64-bit Pinto.
7. HP's just upset that they didn't get to sit on the bow and yell, "I'm the King of Computers!"
6. HP's Itanic line is sunk.
5. "The Itanic is the most advanced chip of her kind. She's practically unsinkable!"
4. HP didn't want to be compared to Leonardo Di Caprio
3. HP Execs suddenly realized that Di Caprio dies in the end
2. Intel assured HP that the Itanic was not sinking, despite being hit by a AMDBerg
1. "My clock wiiilllll, count on and on!"
Sorry, I just couldn't resist.
Re:hp server (Score:3, Funny)
He doesn't provide 24/7 technical support but he will harass your family for free.
How the times change... (Score:5, Funny)
O tempora...
Re:Top 10 (Score:5, Funny)
Eck
All together now... (Score:2, Funny)
What gives them the right? (Score:2, Funny)
This shows how big a problem proprietary closed lock-in has become. Well, I've got a message for HP: Bring it on! You can pry my workstation from m%#y co%@$(
Re:A victory for 32 bit backwards compatibility (Score:2, Funny)
Damn, and I just ordered IA-64 Linux dev. CD.... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:The good news (Score:2, Funny)
Re:A victory for 32 bit backwards compatibility (Score:2, Funny)
Backwards compatibility? Why? I mean you can just recompile, right?
Oh God. Please tell me you didn't go in for one of those closed source software packages....
Re:So, question for the crowd... (Score:3, Funny)
I think it's the sunk cost fallacy - "we've already spent $X billion on this, let's throw a few more billion at it until it works."
Re:How Ironic (Score:5, Funny)
iPods... oh wait...
Re:How Ironic (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Top 10 (Score:3, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)
Ouch! (Score:3, Funny)
Wow. I didn't even know they included self-destruct hardware!