First Destructive Mobile Phone Virus In The Wild 265
gbjbaanb writes "eek! the BBC is reporting the first mobile phone virus that causes damage is out and about. The virus only works with the Symbian Series 60's OS (no, not the Smartphone) and spreads through an adapted copy of the legitimate Mosquitos game.
Once installed, a hidden program sends SMS texts to premium rate numbers.
That's not so bad, no doubt the premium rate numbers will be switched off soon but the worst is yet to come - "typically we see them in the wild then copycat ones come along soon after," said Sal Viveros, director of wireless security at McAfee."
bandwith is not necessary to be annoying (Score:5, Insightful)
"Having that connectivity historically leads to the spread of viruses."
Once more and more devices run the same OS/software and more and more people are using that same OS/software more and more viruses will be written for it. Bandwith has little to do with it.
SMS' to "premium numbers" are annoying and don't require massive mobile bandwith to work.
So? Dont get your software from P2P.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Why is this news (Score:4, Insightful)
This is more a user intelligence program than a true threat to the symbian 60 series. If it propogated to all the numbers in a phone book (via SMS for example) then it would be something worth worrying about.
WTH? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:bandwith is not necessary to be annoying (Score:5, Insightful)
That is why... (Score:3, Insightful)
Welcome to the 21st Century (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't want to live in a world where I have to download patches and updates for my phone, TV, cell phone, alarmclock, bathroom scale, toaster, fridge, etc, every other week, or worry about them charging me money or disclosing private information. Some things work just great already and don't need all sorts of crazy upgrading, networking, or convergence. If you had a portable game thingy (not connected to any network) to play 'Mosquitoes', you wouldn't have to worry about this!
Re:So? Dont get your software from P2P.... (Score:4, Insightful)
How? How is this unknown bad software of the future going to get on my phone? I've got a dev license to symbian and so far I've not seen any way for software to spread unchecked. Sure it could get pushed via a SMS message, but the user would have to click through it to install.
Applications can access all phone functions? (Score:5, Insightful)
Phone applications/games should not be able to access any function that might cost the user money. Or if they do, then the OS itself should intercept and ask the user if they wish to allow the application to send the SMS / phone call / data call. "PsychoSolitaire wishes to send a message to +XX.YYYYYYYYY. This will cost £x. Yes/No/Never"
That is just sensible and obvious design.
Re:so who do i sue ? (Score:3, Insightful)
He said it does it. (Score:2, Insightful)
A fairly important distinction.
Re:Slashdot vs. Article (Score:2, Insightful)
If jacking your mobile bill 100 bucks a month isn't "destructive" enough for you, then, there's nothing I can do about that.
Re:So? Dont get your software from P2P.... (Score:2, Insightful)
Sure it could get pushed via a SMS message, but the user would have to click through it to install.
The same can be said about the majority of Windows malware and look at how successful that malware has been.
Cell Phone viruses (Score:5, Insightful)
Just yesterday I saw an article that said Open Source wasn't ready for Antivirus software. Well - duh! It isn't all that necessary - yet. Most viruses are ineffective on Linux/Unix/BSD/OS/X because of FHS standards, rights and permissions.
Cell phones that play games are about as useful as the teats on a boar hog (and that is a colloquialism). It's the same old game - sell them a useless but "neat" feature that violates sensible security and then sell them a patch to correct that stupidity that they have to buy and buy and buy.
If you spend your money that way - it's your choice really, now isn't it?
Re:so who do i sue ? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Great.... (Score:5, Insightful)
I know, I was like talking to a friend the other day, and he said he saw a computer with "CD-ROM" device attached to it. What's the point in that? Who'd ever need to play music on a computer? All you need is to be able to print letters. Floppy disks ought to be big enough for everyones storage needs.
/sarcasm (circa 1992)
Re:Wow! Where'd'ya find that? (Score:4, Insightful)
Just because we can do something does not mean that we must or should do it. This is yet another example of a solution searching desperately for a problem; a feature (of J2ME) which is rushed to market in the hopes that everyone will go ga-ga over it, while the basic cellular service problems go ignored.
Poor design. (Score:3, Insightful)
It would be simple to have a popup dialog that would ask the user if they want to allow the app to dial a number.
Re:Slashdot vs. Article (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:bah... (Score:1, Insightful)
i wouldn't be surprised if big pharma relied on a similar mechanism.
Re:Not a virus (Score:3, Insightful)
Of course, the public grasps onto Virus = Bad, regardless of its actual function
In reality, most computer viruses are fascinating studies...
--D
Shortsightedness (Score:2, Insightful)
1985: "AIDS? Why do I care? Only homosexuals and junkies get it."
Your attitude is remarkably self-centered. There are a lot of problems in the world that are aggravated by shortsighted people such as yourself.
Symbian OS could use built-in protection (Score:4, Insightful)
It would prevent this sort of unfortunate situation from happening, because, who knows, the next piece of malware like this might install itsself to run all the time and pump out calls or messages, disable uninstallation or wreak any other sort of havoc.
Of course, in the end it all boils down to the end user's stupidity in installing and running untrusted programs, but a safety measure like this would be a good "last chance" before any actual monetary damage is done.
Re:Cell Phone viruses (Score:5, Insightful)
I love this "I don't want the feature, so it's obviously useless" attitude on Slashdot. Games on phones may be useless to you, but I and, evidently by the number of games purchased, many other people find games on phones useful. I often find myself waiting around somewhere (pub, meeting room, bus etc) and carrying very little in the way of entertainment except my phone. So being able to have a quick game of chess, or whatever, is a great way to pass the time.
Sure it's something I could live without (as is pretty much every gadget that I own), but that doesn't mean it's not useful.
Re:Wow! Where'd'ya find that? (Score:3, Insightful)
keep finding more and more features that we don't need while ignoring the one feature that we all demand: reliable voice coverage.
Why does everybody think cell phone manufacturer's are the ones who are installing cell sites? I can make a simple voice phone if I want to, but it's not going to do anything at all to the number of cells in the field. Cell manufacturers take the radio performance of their handsets very seriously -- but that means precisely jack when there's no signal to pick up, or your carrier doesn't have a roaming agreement with any of the networks your phone can see
Re:bah... (Score:3, Insightful)
But security is more than just that. It also means they have to carefully review their code so most bugs gets squashed before the software is released. And a layered design would be a good idea. At one of the lower layers you put basic functionality that controls making and receiving calls and likewise messages. This layer must also ensure, that you can always get access to those features. So a program I download just may not be able to take complete control over the user interface. This shouldn't prevent anybody from for example creating a phonebook with some fancy features, that you can download from the net. But it may never be able to actually perform the calls, it can provide the numbers, and the user will actually see the number and have to press the dial button himself to make the call.
Re:Great.... (Score:1, Insightful)
And they're not even that small! I am actually surprised at how large some of the new phones are! What the fuck, I thought things were supposed to get smaller, not bigger. I still have a Nokia 6160 (I know,