Cisco Reveals Its $500 Million Router 194
Whitecloud writes "After 4 years of development and $500 million in costs, Cisco have a new router: the CRS-1, or Carrier Routing System. Cool features include a 40 gigabit-per-second optical interface, and the ability to cluster the boxes to act as a single router. retail starts at $450,000. Video available here." Update: 05/26 13:55 GMT by T : Sorry; I missed the previous mention of this device.
Re:interesting math (Score:5, Insightful)
Maybe not right this second but demand for bandwith is only going to grow, and probably more rapidly than currently, for the foreseeable future as the entire world becomes digitized and goes online
Re:interesting math (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:interesting math (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:interesting math (Score:2, Insightful)
If they spent 500M on this, and they sell for 450T, and they have a 10% profit margin (unlikely, but it's a round number) then they'd need to sell +10,000 of these boxes to make a profit.
Right, but the target market for these boxes will likely have "Cisco" logos all over their networking racks. Even if they don't make money on this line, they won't have a competitor (Juniper, Nortel, etc) getting a foothold in the data center.
10 years? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:interesting math (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:/. should get one. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:interesting math (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:interesting math? (Score:2, Insightful)
Note that the post states that the routers start at $450K and also note that the router itself must cost something to make apart from the R&D costs, so the number of routers that Cisco must sell in order to make a profit is probably somewhere closer to 2,000 or 3,000. Perhaps they do not plan to make a profit initially, believing that the technology that they have now developed will lead to more optical switching products that will make them mega bucks in the future..
Don't forget that the entire worldwide demand for computers was only ever supposed to be a handful..
I'm sure that we will find something to do with multiple 40Gbps routers..
Multi-player Network video Dance Dance Revolution [ncsu.edu] EXTREME [gamer-talk.net] deathmatch anyone?
Re:Switches (Score:5, Insightful)
The biggest demand and the main objection to IP by all big telcos since the first days of the Internet has been that you cannot interface routers directly into the provisioning backend and that you have to keep highly qualified expensive staff to run it instead of paying a fraction of that for backend software and coasting on it for 7-9 years.
Cisco is the first one to comply with this demand from the IP vendors, but not the last one. In fact Juniper is about to follow, others will also jump on the bandwagon.
It is the first router to have an XML/SOAP interface that can be plugged into the provisioning/maintenance system via an industry standard for interfacing large systems so you no longer need to employ a bunch of CCXX-es to bang on keyboards. In fact it is what carriers have been asking to use MPLS for a while now and similar to what the ITU would have forced down everyone's throat anyway.
This also means that any CCXX that is not accompanied by computing background has just dropped in value and will continue to drop in value as Cisco releases the new IOS to other devices accompanied by tools.
I can understand them doing it. Their revenue from certs has nearly leveled now after that mad rush at the end of the boom. It is time to pick up a new revenue stream in the form of upgrades to Cisco Wors (favourite oximoron) and interfacing to carrier systems.
Re:Switches (Score:3, Insightful)
45 day notice for a new circuit, and they still get it wrong 80% of the time or more, requiring two or three 12 hour days on the phone and a complaint faxed directly to a Vice-President's office before anything gets done. Is that a system that should be catered to?
sPh
Re:Switches (Score:3, Insightful)
Things seemed to be getting better for a while. Back in the 1998-1999-2000 time frame I had new circuits in in 3 weeks (with only 1 day on the phone!), and expansion of existing networks sometimes as fast as 10 days.
But lately it has been 30-45 days, with the occasional 90 day @#@#!$-up. And no one at the telecomm companies seems to know what is going on.
sPh
Re:This would be interesting.. (Score:1, Insightful)