The Ultimate All-In-One Storage Solution 387
karnifex writes "Filled up your LaCie Bigger Disk already, and looking for a little more storage space? Good news! The Petabox is ready! 'The petabox by the Internet Archive is a machine designed to safely store and process one petabyte of information (a petabyte is a million gigabytes).' And luckily, as the Internet Archive notes, it's shipping-container friendly (20' x 8' x 8'). So save on delivery costs and order two!"
Business idea (Score:2, Interesting)
To give you an idea of how much that truly is: (Score:5, Interesting)
Sooooo.... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:colossal... (Score:2, Interesting)
two words (Score:4, Interesting)
or alternatively
What for?
At least as far as the next year or two is concerned. RIAA has all but outlawed music on the computer and even so, a petabyte of $1.25 songs would cost you more than bill gates makes in a year. If you have a petabyte of home movies, you must be making porno films.. If you have a petabyte of DVD's ripped, you have several life sentences coming, even if you own all the dvd's somehow (more bill gates salary multiples). And if you have text files, then holy grapes batman, youll never read all that in 10 lifetimes.
I can see uses in the comercial realm, buying multiple units in order to backup. But if this is in anyway marketed toward the consumer, only the biggest 'mine has to be bigger than yours' geek would buy something like that right now. I'll probably have one of those on my desk/floor about 5 to 7 years from now when its affordable/realisitic for me.
Re:Finally (Score:1, Interesting)
read the docs (Score:2, Interesting)
If you look down in the message list, you see a reference to pdf + ppt docs. Here's another related project Planet Ten Modular Data Centers [planetten.biz].
Yes, it's a petabyte once you fill the shipping container. Honestly, I thought of this idea last year (using stock shipping containers), and now I'm fascinated that they've made it happen.
My only suggestion is that this is prototype: the eventual production systems (say, a couple of years time) should have custom shipping containers for:
* any of the side panels can open to access a rack and hot swap failing racks, so there is no need for a middle entry aisle
* the cooling system should be built into the structure, like existing refigerant containers
* not just data storage, but also computing facilities
Hard drive lifespans (Score:3, Interesting)
If you know of such a site, tell me.
Interesting link... (Score:5, Interesting)
http://capricorn-tech.com/ [capricorn-tech.com]
The site is rather empty right now, but it seems this is the company that will market this petabyte machine... er... box... er... whatever the name is.
Comment removed (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Finally (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Finally - monkeys (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:wrong (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Finally (Score:5, Interesting)
Monkey Shakespeare Simulator [tninet.se]
Maybe not as much fun, but without the faeces
I've noticed that Mozilla Firefox seems to give better results than IE
Re:Potential customers (Score:5, Interesting)
So don't laugh!
(I'm sure there are PLENTY of organizations which could use this type of storage. The IRS and NASA being among them)
Scientific Data (Score:5, Interesting)
Over the couse of the survey we expect to take about 1 PB of data. We're still trying to figure out exactly how we will process and store it all.
For more info, you can poke around here [naic.edu].
Re:read the docs (Score:2, Interesting)
> existing refigerant containers
There's been discussion/research at the Archive regarding exactly this
> * not just data storage, but also computing facilities
Each petabox node is a completely functional ITX PC, running Debian Linux, so it is already also a computing cluster. It's not a very good one, unfortunately, because in the interest of keeping the heat and power down a very low-power processor was used, an 800MHz Via C3, which is marginal as an integer-intensive processor.
Also, the storage nodes (which comprise 796 of the 800 nodes) only have 100bT ethernet, which would limit the petabox's ability to efficiently make use of what processing power it does have (in the data distribution phase).
Nonetheless, 796 800MHz processors is nothing to sneeze at. When the PetaBox is being a PetaBox, its processors are mostly idle. I'm sure folks will figure out something to do with those spare cycles (or perhaps not, considering that exercising the processors noticeably increases the power and cooling burden).
-- TTK
Re:Useless Statistics! (Score:4, Interesting)
50
Oh, it isn't, either. Will you people knock it off already with the Library of Congress == 20TB comparison? It's some sort of inane computation made as if the collection were only books, and all the books were represented as ASCII text only. Well, guess what? It's not, and they're not.
American Memory [loc.gov] alone is a good bunch of terabytes, and that's just a wee digitized slice, just several million objects, of all the stuff in the Library. There's a lot. Of Stuff. A lot a lot a lot. Pictures. Maps. Movies. Big ol' stuff.
Well, I feel better. Thanks!
The Ultimate Storage Solution? I think not... (Score:2, Interesting)