Australia's Great Linux-Based Satellite Network 170
yBshy4 writes "This article may interest the Slashdot folk. LinuxWorld Australia is reporting on Australia's largest satellite network, covering some 800,000 square kilometres, or most of the state of New South Wales, has gone live. The network consists of 75 Linux-based satellite routers that provide Wi-Fi (802.11b) connectivity to country towns that are unable to get DSL. The routers are engineered by Ursys and run Debian providing gateway services such as DNS and mail. According to the article, Ursys chose Debian 'because of its packaging support, which facilitates the ability to push updates to the routers remotely.' Ursys tried to use Windows but it was 'too unstable.' Hopefully this is an important step to providing better Internet access to regional areas across Australia. Anyone know of similar Internet access projects around the world?"
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:My wallet just shriveled. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:My wallet just shriveled. (Score:4, Informative)
Looks like they're using ISDN for upstream and satellite for downstream - did I read this right?
It's a shame they can't leverage the bandwidth of AARNET, which has fibre running right down the newell highway (N-S in country NSW). This is academic stuff and I wouldn't expect that the economics would add up in country NSW for commerical ventures - just not enough people care about the internet there.
From someone who actually supports these things... (Score:5, Informative)
The Ursys guys run their own internal APT repository that all the BusiBox's update from (Yes, the BusiBox's are just normal rackmount PC's), allowing then to easy automate updates.
Their "web interface" is just a custom version of webmin.
I have no idea what the $3500/month for 1GB is about. I dont deal with the billing side at all.
But the service appears to work well. I am looking forward to see how much range we can get out here with the 802.11b gear, as ADSL is unlikely to come to most of these towns for many years.
Re:My wallet just shriveled. (Score:3, Informative)
It's probably cheaper to dump a server in a US colo [theplanet.com] facility overall than dump it in a Australian colo [host1.com.au] and watch yourself get Slashed/Farked no matter what your primary demographic for your website is
Re:My wallet just shriveled. (Score:1, Informative)
Re:My wallet just shriveled. (Score:4, Informative)
Here in the Netherlands, standard DSL service via the ex-state-monopoly DSL provider pings at about 10ms nationally and 160ms to the USA (west coast).
This is not bad and completely unachievable via satellite, because of laws of physics.
For any geostationary satellite solution you need to add 260ms for one-way and double that for two-way solutions, plus any delays incurred by time-division multiplexing (if applicable).
That is a huge increase compared to the above numbers.
The only satellite solution that can be faster is a LEO constellation.
Re:My wallet just shriveled. (Score:5, Informative)
I have no bandwidth limits and it costs me about $US30 a month. There is a transproxy in the middle for HTTP, but I can still BitTorrent at 500KB-1MB/second. And for HTTP stuff that hits the transproxy cache, I regularly get 4-5 MegaBYTES a second.
I'm an Australian who's been living in the US and now Korea. The price of wholesale bandwidth in the Australia is insane and has barely decreased in the 5 years since I left...
Re:My wallet just shriveled. (Score:4, Informative)
Also if you look at http://www.nswnet.net/rurallink/costs/
you'll see they quote AUD$189.00 for a 1GB download limited connection.
Re:Does Australia have a Universal Access Fund? (Score:2, Informative)
Australia Communication Authority - [aca.gov.au]
Universal Service Obligation
Looking at the scheme more cynically, it is designed to provide Flo average citizen from Wagga Wagga with the impression that the government is protecting her from the Big Bad Telco's (Telstra is 51% owned by the Federal Government). Its primary aim is to cover the un-timed local calls. Calls that cost Telstra virtually nothing, and are quite profitable due to the high flag fall charge.
Re:Australia is useless when it comes to Internet (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Australia is useless when it comes to Internet (Score:2, Informative)
This is who I'm with - iinet [iinet.net.au]
Australias got some pretty big nets like this... (Score:3, Informative)
For comparisons sake, the American state of Texas covers about 267,277 sq. miles (about 692,244 sq km)
Re:My wallet just shriveled. (Score:2, Informative)
A mere typo. AUD$35/month for 1gb sounds about right according to telstra's new rates.
Re:My wallet just shriveled. (Score:4, Informative)
Now surely that's in Australian currency, but that still sounds expensive to me.
From what I can see, $3,464 is the annual cost for an entire town to join the RuralLink network. It would be expected that the costs would then be dispersed among "member institutions" within the town (e.g. schools, libraries, and other public institutions).
Once it is shared across a group of institutions, the cost is not all that prohibitive, although it is $171 per month extra for a 3 gigabyte limit, and $150 per gigabyte after that.
Also, the usage is subsidised so that it is virtually free for the first year, and significantly cheaper for two years after that.
This is not targetted at home users. It is for small towns who currently have no other option than dial-up. It is certainly expensive compared to what is available in most parts of Australia, but there are few other options available for institutions in "outback" towns to get high-speed internet.
More pricing information is available here [nswnet.net]
Re:My wallet just shriveled. (Score:4, Informative)
This from the same company that advertises "cheap" mobile phone calls for only 25c- a quick glance and you think 25c per minute, but no, it's 25c per 30 seconds. And of course that rate is only available sometimes (i.e. "Never"). The normal rate turns out to be $1/minute.
On top of the
So instead of the nice cheap
They force people into 24 month plans with exceptionally good deals and change the plan halfway through (uncapped, unmetered 10mbit cable for $69/month. Until we decide to cap it at 10gigs. And have "technical errors" slowing the network 70% of the time. And oops, our mail servers don't work. Sorry about that. We don't care- your stuck on this crap for 2 years)
If you took Microsoft, Real, SCO, De Beers, and the Russian Mafia, and rolled them all into one big monopoly, they would still be less evil than telstra.
Re:The article text is incorrect (Score:2, Informative)
see NSW Net Costs document [nswnet.net]
Still not cheap but OK for remote rural areas that can't get ADSL. Note the Linux router suppliers make a good proportion of it ($1K pa).
Cheers
VikingBrad
Re:How's this work? (Score:2, Informative)
State of Broadband in Oz (Score:1, Informative)
I could get an ISDN line from our beloved Tel$tra but would pay more for a 64k line than people up the road are paying for 512k unlimited DSL - and i would be locked into a 1 year contract.
Yet another reason to kick Johnny in the arse come the election at the end of this year. Vision? What is that?
Re:Too bad Teledesic didn't get to launch (Score:2, Informative)
Re:State of Broadband in Oz (Score:2, Informative)
Have you tried reapplying today? Telstra just extended the distance allowable for ADSL just the other day. Now the most common copper can be over 4km instead of 3.5km.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cf