Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses It's funny.  Laugh. Hardware Your Rights Online

Tom's Hardware Investigates Michael's Computers 609

cojsl writes "Tom's Hardware has an extensive article raising questions about Michael's Computers and their claims of a laptop with a "3DMark03 Average Score - 15,417"." It gets funnier as you go along.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Tom's Hardware Investigates Michael's Computers

Comments Filter:
  • Sociopaths (Score:4, Informative)

    by DustMagnet ( 453493 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @12:10PM (#8589018) Journal
    Michael was very articulate and calm during the interview. He appears convinced of what he says and advertises.

    Sociopaths [datawest.net] are dangerous people. Tracking them down is fine, but be careful if you decide to tangle with one. Some will dedicate their life to revenge.

  • My benchmark (Score:1, Informative)

    by trompete ( 651953 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @12:10PM (#8589022) Homepage Journal
    My computer has a rating of about 12,000 for the following specs: P4 HT 3.06 GHZ 1 GB RAM @ 800 MHZ FSB ATI 9600 XT Graphics Card Western Digital SATA 160 GB I've seen computers with 15000 before, but they had Athlon FXs and/or Radeon 9800 Pro cards.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @12:12PM (#8589034)
    "SuperDell" Schanze makes similar claims, offering $1000 to anyone who can build or buy a faster computer. http://www.totallyawesomecomputers.com/
  • by Newtonian_p ( 412461 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @12:21PM (#8589114) Homepage
    I can't believe it, their main server is slashdotted, you can still access their page at this address:
    http://www20.tomshardware.com/
  • Re:My benchmark (Score:5, Informative)

    by Tweaker_Phreaker ( 310297 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @12:21PM (#8589122)
    You seem to be confusing 3DMark03 with 3DMark01. The system you described would be lucky to get '5000' in 3DMark03.
  • by Gumshoe ( 191490 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @12:35PM (#8589264) Journal
    In the interview he claims to have worked for Cryotech and suggests that he uses cryogenics instead of air cooling. There are no fans in other words. I'm still calling shenanigins though.
  • by Graelin ( 309958 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @12:36PM (#8589280)
    Alienware [alienware.com] comes to mind. Their machines are pretty cool. Lots of high-end equipment that is pretty to look at, but the prices are a touch high.

    If you really want the uber game machine you probably want to build it yourself. Maximum performance doesn't ALWAYS have to cost you stability if you buy the right parts from the right vendors.

    You're right about local stores, at least in my area, they are very delayed. I can usually order the latest online and get it in the mail before any local chains get it in stock. As far as I can tell, the local mom n' pop stores are always the most cautious to get the latest hardware. Try the gamer franchises, like EB Games. Best Buy, Circuit City, CrapUSA never have a good enough selection of products. (They might only sell PNY Nvidia cards, when you really want the Hercules.)
  • by Brando_Calrisean ( 755640 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @12:37PM (#8589283)
    Take a look at Michael's 'Press Releases' section. It's the same piece of text copied and pasted over and over again with different dates! Mar. 17th, 2004 - This just in, we are the best! Feb. 27th, 2003 - This just in, we are the best! Apr. 15th, 2001 - This just in, we are the best!
  • 3DMark2001 and 2003 (Score:5, Informative)

    by Pidder ( 736678 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @12:38PM (#8589300)
    15,000 is a very reasonable score for a decent system in the 2001 version where the world record is a few points over 30,000. It's very likely that the marketing guy just made a simple mistake.

    3dMark2003 is a whole different ball game however, and a score of 15,000 is clearly impossible. The world record is just over 10,000 points (trivia: made by finnish overclocker 'Macci' with a p4 3.2 EE clocked to 4.5 ghz and a Radeon 9800XT clocked extremely high).

    Extreme overclocking has gone a long way. Macci cools both his cpu and gpu with a cascade system which is two phase change coolers (like the Vapochill) connected together in some cool way I don't have the technical know-how to describe. It cools both his cpu and gpu to -100C.
  • by NickNiel ( 456061 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @12:47PM (#8589367)
    It has been up for like 3 minutes and is already slashdotted..... Unfortunately, the pictures are pretty integral to the article....

    Too Good to Be True: Michael's Computers

    Introduction

    "I don't care what kind of computer you have now, but it CAN'T be faster than one from Michael's Computers. You may think your PC is the best in the world, but you are wrong. With a boot time of 4 seconds, a 3dMark 2003 score of 17,000+, and a .19 decibel rating - a computer from Michael's Computers cannot be beat," or so Michael's Computers' claims.

    We usually don't do investigative articles, but the claims coming from Michael's Computers were too good to ignore. A deluge of discontent expressed in emails and discussion forums further prompted us to look into a deal that seemed to good to be true.

    Evidence was gathered from numerous phone interviews, countless emails and several visits to alleged Michael's Computers business locations. To top it all off, we tracked down Mr. Gonzales and interviewed him ON VIDEO, which can be viewed/downloaded at the end of this article.

    So, is Michael J. Gonzales, the owner of Michael's Computers, misleading consumers by posting false information? Is he using proprietary logos without permission, and operating without the necessary business permits? Read on and decide for yourself.

    The Buzz About Michael's Computers

    I first heard of Michael's Computers on Feb 25, 2004 when THG received this email from Ryan Sanders.

    I was wondering if your site has ever had any news on Michaels Computers (www.michaelscomputers.com). His site has been a swirl of controversy over the last week on many a message boards due to claims of hitting 17,000+ in 3DMark03 from their desktop, and 13-15,000 for their notebooks. On top of that, they claim to have a "AMD FX51 3400+ CPU". As most of us know their are 2 different CPU's that fit that description (The Athlon64 FX-51 and then there is the Athlon64 3400+), but when contacted about that, he claimed it was in fact the correct title for the CPU, and that it was some sort of specially optimized CPU.

    I was wondering, since you are a well established and reputable hardware site, if you could look into this, or request a sample product for Review? I, along with many others, believe this site to be a joke, or hoax, and don't want to see a bunch of people buy into the big numbers of the benchmark scores. Thank you for your time.

    Sincerely,
    Ryan Sanders.


    I was thinking, "WOW!!! I want this laptop!" so I searched for more information on discussion forums and Michael's website.

    Just before this article was submitted, I received this email from Chuck Davis:

    A year ago I called them on the phone and talked directly to Michael. He totally sold me on his stuff and therefore I continued to follow his site. I ordered an am MX51 back in Nov. and waited two weeks with no computer. We were emailing each other with ?s and responses during that two week period. On a Sun. he said the MX51 would be shipped that week and he would send me a tracking #. On Fri. still nothing and I emailed him and nothing so I cancelled. Luckily I was able to use my credit card and had no problem with a refund. Since that time he has stopped accepting emails.

    Truthfully, he is a complete liar. He told so many lies about the MX51, I am so glad I was able to get out of it. Almost every claim he made was false. If you need more detail I will give them to you later. Stay away from this company.


    Discussion Boards

    I browsed a few online discussion boards such as Futuremark, Sharky Extreme, and IGN. Each time Michael's Computers has been mentioned, the boards have been flooded with responses. Some of these discussions have generated HUNDREDs of posts, like this discussion from the Sharky Extreme Forums.

    I hope you have a lot of time available to read the 470+ posts on that particular discussion.
  • I Have One (Score:5, Informative)

    by O_D_Evans ( 763044 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @12:56PM (#8589471)
    The notebooks featured on Michael's site are actually Clevo (http://www.clevo.com.tw/) notebooks. They are sold in the US under the brand name Sager, available from (among others) pctorque.com. I have the 17" model (tricked out w/ P4 3.2, 1gig RAM, ATI 9600 128MB, DVD burner etc etc) and it *is* bloody quick, but not that quick (about 20 sec to boot XP to usable state). I got it to run 3D CAD/CAM, which it does, like a dream. The only downside of this is it also runs Q3A amazingly well too, so I never actually get any work done ;).
  • by whyde ( 123448 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @12:57PM (#8589482)
    a guy in South Florida who used to sell (back in the day) PC clone computers where it was trendy to have a "turbo" button and an LED on the front panel showing the CPU clock speed.

    Some of the cases simply had three 7-segment LEDs with jumpers to select what was "displayed" when the "turbo" button was pressed.

    This guy was selling "100 MHz" 80486 computers back when the top speed available was still 33 MHz, and it took awhile before anybody called bullshit... the amazing thing is that people were willing to believe that their computers really were that much faster, just to stroke their own ego.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @01:11PM (#8589629)
    You know, Totally Awesome Computers was the first thing I thought of as soon as I saw the article... at least they have physical stores you can walk in, but the guy is pretty crazy. They give you the runaround if you try and show them a better system.

    I'd be careful about tangling with Super Dell. He seems to be a man on the edge. I listened to a scary radio stunt one morning involving Super Dell. I guess Super Dell has said some things that offended Native Americans. On the radio show, one of the DJ's went to Super Dell's house dressed as an Indian and did Indian chants outside. Super Dell came outside (decked out in camouflage and face paint) with a gun and had two rottweilers at his side. Luckily, the police arrived quickly. All of this prompted people who have had run-ins with Super Dell to call the station and tell about their experiences. I don't know if a lot the stories are true, but some sounded so bizarre that I don't think people could have made them up.

    See the following:
    http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249, 590039188,00 .html
    http://www.sltrib.com/2003/Oct/10172003/bus iness/b usiness.asp
    http://www.superdellsucks.com/index.h tml
  • by black_widow ( 41044 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @01:15PM (#8589680) Homepage
    194 decibels, A-weighted, is equivalent to the saturn 5 rocket or 50lbs of TNT detonated 10 feet away.

    194 decibels (RMS) sound-pressure-level approaches the atmospheric pressure level.

    With an RMS value of 194 decibels, the peak SPL would modulate the atmospheric value entirely. That would make it the loudest possible...

    194 Maximum possible (from atmospheric 14.7psi down to 0psi)
    177 Record for car audio!
    170 Shotgun blast up close
    160 Perforation of eardrum
    140 Jet Aircraft Taking Off
    120 Human Threshold of Pain - 1 watt/sq. meter
    120 Loud Rock Concert
    110 Moderate rock concert, dance club
    100 Motorcycle
    -- extended listening above 85-90dB leads to hearing loss --
    90 Lawnmower, loud home stereo
    85 Jackhammer at 15 meters (50 feet)
    80 Moderate home stereo, ringing telephone
    75 Average City Street
    70 Freeway traffic, TV audio
    60 Normal Conversation
    50 Large office background noise
    40 Quiet office or residential area
    30 Whisper at 3 meters (10 feet), Very soft music
    20 "Silent" TV Studio, Whisper at 1 meter, Quiet living room
    10 Soft rustling of leaves
    0 Human threshold of hearing (youths)
    (table from http://www.geocities.com/rf-man/db.html )
  • by Strange Ranger ( 454494 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @01:41PM (#8589983)
    OK troll this is for anyone ELSE who is intested: Pricegrabber total plus $370 but no tax.

    Right in line with all the other quotes I got from the custom build shops on resellerratings.com, only real difference was a 7 year warranty for free instead of an extended 3-year that costs extra. A sucker is someone who thinks he's getting something he's not. I got exactly what I wanted. Maybe next time YOU'LL build it for me and warranty it for less (while I go fishing)?
  • Re:I Have One (Score:3, Informative)

    by NotAnotherReboot ( 262125 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @01:47PM (#8590054)
    Don't forget quite a few other companies seem to use Clevo too...or at least the same cases...
    If you remember Liebermann Computers [go-l.com] (a lot of people thought they might be a hoax with some of their products), even their laptops look the same.

    Alienware also looks the same.
  • Re:easy foolery (Score:5, Informative)

    by British ( 51765 ) <british1500@gmail.com> on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @01:51PM (#8590102) Homepage Journal
    I was just bored. I wondered to see what sort of response I would get. Mind you, this was in the early days of the web. More detail here:

    http://british.nerp.net/commentary/alburt.html

  • by adnoid ( 22293 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @02:07PM (#8590260)
    As someone in the sound reproduction industry I can say that you're pretty much right. The spec for the siren you cite is 138 dB at 100 feet. Conventional speakers are measured at 1 meter with 1 watt of input and are in the 90 range, generally. The sound pressure level of that siren at 1 meter would be 172 dB (#include various_reasonable_assumptions.h)

    For reference, 120 dB is the threshold of physical pain and equivalent to standing next to the engine of a jet transport at takeoff thrust. Beyond that organ damage begins.

    What a load of crap.
  • by nolife ( 233813 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @02:22PM (#8590396) Homepage Journal
    Google for spl world record
    I did not specifically find the quoted 177 but a few in the mid 170's.. Many of the google links describe this sport and the background.
  • by Hiro Antagonist ( 310179 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @02:34PM (#8590525) Journal
    *sigh*

    But you have seen new breeds of dogs, and new strains of the flu virus, and new antibiotic-resistant bacteria, right? The exact same principles apply to us -- only many humans are way too arrogant to acknowledge that, yes, we are subject to the same forces of any other animal. Natural selection is still alive and well, thank you, and along with its friends 'Variation' and 'Mutation', evolution is still chugging along.

    The underlaying rules behind evolution are testible, and have been proven as well as any scientific fact can be (see the Problem of Induction in any philosophy textbook), which is why evolutionary modeling techniques are used in any field that requires predictions about complex molecules. This includes chemical engineering, medical research, and even computer software design.

    Go read talkorigins.org [talkorigins.org]; it explains a lot, and it answers a lot of common misconceptions about evolution. Also note that evolution says nothing about religion, and many religious people believe that God put the rules in place to let us evolve -- which is a much more reasonable concept than assuming that what happened in the Bible literally occurred, and that God just put all these fossils and all of that radioactive material around 'just to confuse the unworthy'.

    Creationism is supernatural -- it completely contradicts pretty much every piece of scientific knowledge in almost every field, from anthrpology to quantum mechanics. Thus, proving creationism *would* earn one the million dollars -- and, yes, people have tried to do it, and failed.
  • by Soul-Burn666 ( 574119 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @02:38PM (#8590558) Journal
    According to the Guinness record [guinnessworldrecords.com], the loudest scream was 129 decibels.
  • by VoraciousGorak ( 715175 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @03:06PM (#8590778)
    ...posted a thread in Futuremark.com's forums about their investigation, so the "Onions" who dwell there (myself included) knew about this a while ago. Unfortunately for the poor editor, his colleague had already alienated the Onions by posting some very incendiary anti-AMD and anti-AMD-user articles in THG, and so the editor who posted there didn't receive any help at all. He actually got flamed out of the forum and the thread got deleted.

    On that note, it would take a SERIOUS n00b to believe any of the BS from Michael's Computers. All they need do is look at the FM ORB and realize the highest score EVER ACHIEVED using stock settings is just over 10000 (10008 [futuremark.com], to be exact).

    Actually, now that I read the article, I must take a chuckle at the 500GB HyperDrives. I'll take one for my X-Wing, please.

    As I said a few days ago on the FM forums... I think my bullshitometer just overloaded.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @03:10PM (#8590819)
    I'm pretty sure that the Athlon 64 notebook is a Mitac 8355 -- the same as sold by Hypersonic [hypersonic-pc.com] and Voodoo [voodoopc.com]. There are quite a few vendors that sell this model. A partial listing is found here [amdboard.com].

    I bought one from Hyperdata [hyperdatadirect.com] which is basically the retail front for Sunrex. I'm very happy with it so far, it seems well put together and haven't noticed any hardware defects.

    This is definitely not for someone who plans to carry their laptop around all day, but it's fine for occassionally lugging to work, conferences, vacation, etc. Besides, the performance and largeish screen are very nice.

    I was daring and ordered mine sans OS. After a couple of tries and a little poking around on the web I was able to install Fedora Core 1 (x86-64 version) successfully. The 2 main tricks are

    1. disable frame buffering during install, "linux nofb"
    2. the installer won't recognize the Radeon 9600 mobility, you have to hand configure and use the VESA driver
    With the above two tricks an out-of-the-box FC1 install is quite usable. Some deficiencies noted:
    • underperforming video driver (no surprise)
    • wireless kernel module not found
    • misc minor software issues that are probably due more to the imaturity of FC1 x86-64.
    I think most of these issues could be resolved with just a little tinkering, but I don't have the time. My plan is to wait for FC2 official release and hope most of the problems magically go away.
  • Maybe it's me... (Score:3, Informative)

    by DarkHelmet ( 120004 ) * <mark&seventhcycle,net> on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @03:10PM (#8590822) Homepage
    But even if I didn't know anything about computer hardware and such, here's the part that I noticed that would raise the red flag:

    There's no dynamic element to the webpage, whatsoever!!!

    There's no shoppping cart system, at all! All that's there is a "buy now" paypal link on each of the product pages.

    Maybe it's me, but using a third party processor like Paypal, Ibill, whatnot, holds against a company's legitimacy. Sadly, I'd be better off giving my credit card number over the net to another store because at least those who can process credit card orders through the web have a merchant account.

    Places that have merchant accounts are very picky about chargebacks. A company like Michael's Computers wouldn't be able to have one for very long.

  • by AndrewRUK ( 543993 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @04:00PM (#8591355)
    Wrong, dB is a logarithmic scale, a doubling in power is equivalent to an increase of 3dB (*10 = +10dB) so two speakers at 90dB would make 93dB.
  • by Strange Ranger ( 454494 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @04:32PM (#8591686)
    Oh geez alright then I hate the guy, whatever. I really don't care.

    I do care just a little about my rep here on /. though. How about googling for "Strange Ranger"? Unless you think I opened this account years ago and have been posting lies all along because I was planning to someday defend my false advertising? Get real.

    I'll check that link out at home, blocked from here/work. But I do remember the cheesy giant eagle and such. If you look at what I wrote I said it was LESS over the top, I didn't say he wasn't making claims, but yes he has gotten worse, much worse. Maybe he's not selling enough and got more desperate. I really don't know. I also said, "I always ignored his marketing", I knew he was a one man show so the marketing foibles didn't bother me. I got what I wanted out of him at a decent price. And the service HAS BEEN good. I wouldn't buy again because instead of exaggerating in his marketing (oh yeah like THAT's so rare, esp for a one-man operation) now he seems to have gone off the deep end. He's got a "sound system" he says is louder than a space shuttle launch and a cooling system that is quieter than soft human breathing on a heavily overclocked PC?? I dunno, maybe he hit his head! Haha. My main point of the post was the last few lines...

    IT takes more than a $Widget expert to run a $Widget business. Case-in-point - his site is now down and he's not selling anything at all.
  • No doubt! (Score:2, Informative)

    by macdaddy ( 38372 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @05:02PM (#8591977) Homepage Journal
    Usually the weaker the evidence, the more someone tries to insist they ar [sic] right.

    You can say that again:

    "Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction."
    - Dick Cheney, speech to VFW National Convention

    "Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons."
    - George W. Bush, speech to UN General Assembly, Sept. 12, 2002

    "The world is also uniting to answer the unique and urgent threat posed by Iraq."
    - George W. Bush, Nov. 23, 2002

  • by Strange Ranger ( 454494 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @05:22PM (#8592161)
    Shit I don't think he's going to be around in 7 minutes! Haha. He made his bed so to speak. Hmmm... any problems and I guess I'll deal with the OEMs, of course they're all quite reputable.

    All I did was pick out every single component I wanted and then I looked for somebody to build it for me. He even had to order the SIS 648 board because he didn't carry it. Everything I said is the damn truth though. For the same price I picked him over the competition for 7 years vs. 1 year (1 is not very customer oriented and is unacceptable for anything costing thousands), and looking back I think it was mostly because he seemed eager to build it vs. "we don't carry that yet".

    Even w/o the warranty, in the end I paid him about 370 for labor, got good support, a free 40 dollar firewire card overnighted to solve a problem, etc. I had a good experience. Maybe it's because he knew after 1 minute on the phone that couldn't fool me, or maybe it's because I told him what to build instead of asking for his "standard". Or maybe, just maybe, the guy means well and knows how to build a pc, but has A TON to learn about running and esp. marketing a business. Maybe he's a pathological liar and I got off lucky because the only thing he lied to me about was the warranty since that's the only thing he COULD lie to me about. I doubt that given the card he shipped me without me asking for it. (I wanted to make the audigy port work) But I'll never know. Other than wishing to see goodness in people, I have no reason to care at this point.
  • Re:Lesson to learn: (Score:2, Informative)

    by srcosmo ( 73503 ) <ultramegatronNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @05:24PM (#8592170) Journal
    That would be Victor Lustig [rr.com], one of the greatest frauds ever.

    At one point he apparently sold a phony counterfeitting machine to some poor sap for $25,000 (in 1926 dollars!). After his arrest on unrelated charges, he used another of the machines to bribe his way out of jail -- and net $10,000 from the (rather thick) sherrif in the process.

    It's all in the link up there.

  • by LookSharp ( 3864 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @05:42PM (#8592390)
    I'd like to have seen THG actually buy one of these alleged machines...

    They asked for a review unit repeatedly, were denied in person and emails went unanswered.

    Not that I blame you for not reading the article, Tom only puts fifteen words per ad-page. There used to be a "Print this Article" link that would give it to you all at once, but I couldn't find it today.

  • by Jonas79 ( 763122 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @05:55PM (#8592582)

    1. FX-51 3400+ According to every review I've read, the FX-51 is speed rated at 3400+. Obviously there is no FX-51 that RUNS at 3400mhz, but does it say that in the add here (http://www.tomshardware.com/column/20040317/too_g ood_to_be_true-03.html)? Of course not, it simply says 3400+ which could be, and probably is, the speed rating.


    The A64 FX processors don't use the XX00+ marketing numbers. He has also claimed that the processor is custom made just for him. That's just BS.


    2. Currently, there are no 500GB internal desktop hard drives. Apparantly Mr. Tom needs to read the details a little more. What brand is the drive? It's a Michael's TXK drive. Hmm, sounds like Michael creates his own drive. How? Well if you use some basic logic, you can determine that this is nothing other than two 250gb drives in raid. Was that really hard to deduce Tommy? Oh, and there is nothing immoral, illegal, or fraudulent to raid two drives and then re-name them as your own. And before one of you decides to flame this post, re-read what was just said. There is nothing immoral, illegal, or frauduelnt in raiding two drives and renaming them as your own.


    Here you are corrrect. He said on his site that it was a RAID array. Nothing strange there.


    3. Boot time of 4s Man Tom, I've really lost all credibility for a site that doesn't know what a ram drive is. If you check here (http://www.tomshardware.com/column/20040317/too_g ood_to_be_true-02.html) you find the words "instant on" which again, further the truth that this is a ramdrive. There is another company which claims comparable numbers. I don't have the URL now but it was hosted in quite a few hardware reviews - and they use polished marble as their brand and place it in each desktop and laptop. They too use ramdrives in BOTH desktops and laptops. Granted, it's ungodly expensive to have ~4gb of ram setup with the proper software to utilize it as a ramdrive, and battery backup, but yes, this will provide instant on sub 4s boottime Tomster.


    You need to get your "facts" straight. A RAM drive looses all it's information when the power goes off and needs to be reloaded from a hard drive at boot. There is NO WAY to get any pc to boot in 4 seconds. At least not into Windows.


    5. .11db So he sound dampens his shit with a hell of a lot of insulation. Big deal. Next.


    I don't think you understand how low that is. He says that he uses Antec power supplies, and although they are quite, they are not silent... .11 dba would be eight times quiter than a person breathing (~10dba remember it's a logaritmic scale). That is also BS.

    6. 3DMark 17k If you can't prove he didn't score this, then don't say he can't achieve it. Granted that number seems unatainable, but who knows.

    Yeah, and pigs can fly. 17k in 3DMark03 is not possible... The record is 10008 points and that is with an extremely overclocked P4 and extremely overclocked 9800XT.
    And then there is the Windows XP 2004, claiming that the CPU has 1024 MB of cache in one email, claiming that he has won awards, claiming to have merged with vapochill...
    There really isn't much truth anywhere, and I'm sorry, but I can't feel any sympathy for this man. He's just trying to screw ppl.

  • by Drawkcab ( 550036 ) on Wednesday March 17, 2004 @06:58PM (#8593335)
    A description of the Randi/Browne fued from Randi's POV. I suppose that it comes down to who you find more credible, but in my mind it certainly isn't the phony psychic. "I don't really know why I'm spending any of my valuable time on the professional liar who uses the name Sylvia Browne. However, since I get so many questions from readers about what she says and writes about me and about the JREF, I have to do a certain amount of repair work from time to time. This examination of her recent mendacious tirades will not be kind. I've no obligation to be tolerant of this person, and I'm known to call 'em as I see 'em. She has freely attacked me in the media, making false and damaging statements about me, without any opposition from those who gave her the platform from which to deliver this trash. I'm answering in kind. The big difference in our approaches is that all of my response that follows is factual and provable. And it's damning to Browne. WHAT FOLLOWS IS STRONG, DIRECT, NO-HOLDS-BARRED, AND TRUE. I'll apologize in advance to my readers, so that I might be spared the expected murmers about how rude I was. Browne has viciously slandered and libeled me, in the public media, repeatedly. This is my response, and I don't give a damn whether she likes it or not. Read on, if you dare. As most of you will know, Sylvia owes her entire success to those two intellectual giants of TV -- Larry King and Montel Williams. These are two well-educated men who certainly are not themselves deceived by these "psychics" on whom they dote; they give them air-time and promote them freely because of the basic bottom line: all that matters to them is the program ratings, thus the opinion of their sponsors, and they know full well that they'll get maximum attention when any "psychic" matter is introduced on their programs. That's all they care about; truth is discarded when money is scented. Let's look back to just one particularly cruel hoax perpetrated by this woman Browne. Years ago on Montel Williams' show, she spoke to the grandmother of a local missing child, a six-year-old named Opal Jo Jennings who disappeared from her home in north Texas in March of 1999. Browne told the distraught woman that the child was still alive but had been sold into white slavery and was currently being held in Japan. She even gave a city name, but there is no such city in Japan. Moving ahead three years and nine months, we find that the body of little Opal was recovered -- just seven weeks ago; she had been killed by a blow to the head. Currently, there is a man in prison in Texas who has confessed to, and been convicted of, Opal Jo's abduction and murder. Think about what's happened here: Sylvia Browne callously raised the hopes of the family of this little child, placing the fictitious location on the other side of the world. She did this well after a comprehensive search had already been performed in Texas, so she was pretty sure that the girl would never be found. She thought she was safe against exposure. She wasn't; the body was found and definitively identified. That was a callous, cruel, manipulative act by Sylvia Browne. But no one calls her to account for it, and her supporters continue on in Lotusland cooing over her wonderful powers. You have to wonder how someone can do such a heartless act. Sylvia can, and does. Larry Thornton just sent me a tape and a transcript of the "Coast to Coast" radio show of Thursday, February 19th, 2004, Browne's most recent attack on me. The host was George Noory. There were three mentions of my name in this show, full of blatant lies and slander. Sylvia was at her best, which is to say, at her worst. First, asked by Noory about her agreement to do the test for the million-dollar JREF prize, she interrupted with: "He [Randi] doesn't have any money!" That statement by Sylvia Browne is a direct, knowing, lie. She has received documentary proof of the existence of the James Randi Educational Foundation Prize Account, along with a letter from Goldman, Sachs & Company stating that the account -- in "liquid

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...