What (non-PC) Hardware Do You Hack? 696
Lis writes "Mike Langberg at the Merc News interviewed Scott Fullam - Scott wrote the book 'Hardware Hacking Projects for Geeks' which includes things like a video periscope for your car, an Internet toaster, Cubicle Intrusion Detection Systems, and talking Furbys. (Instructions for the toaster and coffeemaker are up on the O'Reilly site.) Almost any kind of consumer electronic equipment can be modified to do things it wasn't intended to do. Ok, you'll probably void your warranty in the process, but you could end up with something even better than the original. Or not. But it's just gotta be interesting. So what have you hacked, and into what?"
Re:Women (Score:2, Informative)
"He's got a mistress, she's Puerto Rican, and I hear she's got a wooden leg." -- Tom Waits
KFG
Re:my coolest 'hack' (Score:1, Informative)
shame on YOU.
-JeanBaptiste
HP-41C Synthetic Programming (Score:4, Informative)
My favorite little synthetic program made the machine tick ominously like a Geiger counter.
Thanks for bringing back fond memories from 20 years ago.
MEGASQUIRT!! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Grill (Score:1, Informative)
TiVo (Score:2, Informative)
Good hacking tool: (Score:5, Informative)
Remote key-loggers anyone?
The PIC makers [microchip.com]
More stuff [brouhaha.com]
My remote (Score:1, Informative)
Here's a good starter:
http://www.lucindrea.com/jp1/JP1_For_Be
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jp1/
SafeHouse (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Morning simulator (Score:1, Informative)
IIRC these were first used for indoor gardening (No, not weed. Its always high noon in a cannabis grow room....or so I've heard) before someone decided to plug their bedroom light into it.
Re:Morning simulator (Score:2, Informative)
More info on the one I have is here [outsidein.co.uk],
Also, I have found that moving from London to Sydney has helped....no need for a dawn simulator here!!
you can get premade boxes to do that (Score:4, Informative)
Opel Display (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Hacking cars - from a Car Nut (Score:3, Informative)
You described this guy perfectly..
Lemme guess... 3" diameter sounds-like-a-chainsaw exhaust tip and resonator, connected to the factory's 1" or so diameter stock exhaust system, 300lbs of stereo equipment with lots of tacky flashing lights in his "race car", and a big "Powered by Honda" sticker somewhere?
He claimed the mods to his Civic was giving him roughly 300+ HP.
I could get 300+ horses out of that motor, easily. In fact, I'd do it for him pro bono. 'Course, the only problem is that the engine wouldn't last more than about 10 minutes with the stuff I'd be dumping into the air filter. (Diesel engine starting fluid and NOS...)
Of course, it still wouldn't make a front wheel drive car fast, the weight transfer during heavy acceleration is to the rear of the car (and onto the rear wheels), so his traction would become worse and worse as the power was increased... :) (That's for any Slashdot reader who doesn't know why FWD sucks.)
He told me stories about blowing Mustangs off the road etc..
Heheh... What he didn't tell you is that the Mustangs he blew off the road all had that wheezy little 2.3L four-cylinder engine, over 200,000 miles, and behind the wheel are middle-aged secretaries who didn't even know that they were racing him!
Oddly enough, I actually did see him at the track. The tree went green and he drove down the track like the many other Civics and squeek out something in the high 17's. He knows I was there and he knows I saw him run and I know he saw me running my 91 Mustang (mid 14's/~96mph 100% pure stock with 2.73 rear and 125k miles).
2.73 and you did that? Impressive, you've taken good care of your motor!
Ya know, if you have the AOD transmission, you could get pretty radical on your rear gears and not lose much gas mileage unless you're always on the freeways. A set of 3.51 or so gears would really bring that thing to life and probably shave off more than a second on your 1/4 mile.
The next day at work he said he would have done so much better and got times close to mine if he wasn't spinning so much at the line. Well there was no spinning and his trap speed supported his time perfectly
Heh... You know, I've done mid 17s with a perfectly stock stickshift Chevette; 16.6 when I replaced the Holley carb with the larger one off a 1982 Dodge Aries. You should tell him that.
Of course, there's always excuses that he can blame for his poor times, but when it comes right down to it, it's either car or driver. You were there the same day and did downright good times on your car, so the track and weather were good. We already know the car is faulty (half the engine is missing, and what is there is pointing the wrong way), and I suspect the driver driver isn't much better (half the brain is missing, and what is there is located in his ass).
but I was not about to argue with him. This guy was in some serious denial. I am not a FF guy myself but I have seen many sport compacts with some great times, of course for every one that is truely impressive, there are 100's that are really confused.
Most of them are really confused. By the time you've spent the money to get respectable times out of any FWD car, you could have bought a real car, with a real engine, and been turning real (not just "well, that's pretty good for a Civic") times.
Super-sticky tires and suspension mods are expensive and still don't compensate for the inescapable laws of inertial weight transfer which give RWD cars a benefit and FWD cars a disadvantage. The small motor may achieve massive volumetric efficiency, but there's still not enough volume to provide the raw power of a less-efficient big V8.
The guy is delusional, and unless you have some very special reason to love the car's engine and transmission, there's simply no intelligent reason to build it up. It's a tool, you don't spend hours filing down a pair of linesman's pliers to make them into (poor) needlenoses, when you can simply go out and buy