San Francisco's Got Free Wi-Fi 156
Carpoolio writes "If you're living in San Francisco, chances are you can connect, for free, to the BARWN -- the Bay Area Research Wireless Network. BARWN broadcasts an 802.11 signal from the top of a big hill near San Francisco, and anyone with a clear sight line to the signal can connect. Another set of wireless nodes are being placed around town by SFLan, making Wi-Fi available to tens of thousands of people."
Overloaded? (Score:4, Interesting)
WiFi VOIP (Score:5, Interesting)
It's been my experience that iChat has near cell sound quality, so having a small hardware iChat (or whatever you use) client with 802.11b access would be pretty sweet.
SBC Surrenders. (Score:4, Interesting)
IP addressing?? How? (Score:1, Interesting)
Does anyone benchmark these? (Score:5, Interesting)
Ganging APs for more WiFi bandwidth (Score:4, Interesting)
Monetize THIS! (Score:5, Interesting)
The thing about free wireless (that I love) is that it keeps the Ashcroft-types up at night worrying about anonymous "terrorist" freespeech, and it gives the telco-types and the WISP-wannabes the middleman middle finger.
Community owned and operated, adhoc wireless mesh networking [wired.com] will be the future of free ubiquitous access despite some peoples early attempts to coopt it. It's similar to how FedEx thought they could own the Fax business [shirky.com] in the 80s. Can't blame 'em for trying I guess.
--
Not really new news... (Score:4, Interesting)
When I lived in SF, I got in a heated debate with a guy named Scott regarding whether all of this 802.11 ad-hockery was stealing from the phone company. He was largely a troll, never really arguing any points directly and shifting focus: but you can see the results at my website [moremayo.com]. He's even come back way after the fact and submitted comments in my comment section.
The reason I bring up this discussion is because I think Scott's misconceptions about what people are doing with 802.11 open access points brings up a serious issue. Read what he has to say: and read between the lines for the greater position that he stands behind. It's a scary thought to consider that people believe that the phone companies have a right to make money, regardless of how badly they mishandle their markets.
Re:Monetize THIS! (Score:3, Interesting)
Community owned and operated, adhoc wireless mesh networking will be the future of free ubiquitous access despite some peoples early attempts to coopt it.
Nope, mesh networking (as described in your link, anyway) will never be free. Someone has to pay for those "stems reaching into the Internet," after all. The current system of semi-centralization is much more efficient than a mesh network. You run a bunch of connections to a central location, then you run a single big connection between those locations. The telephone network wasn't built this way by accident. It was built this way because it is the most efficient way to do things. Sure, wireless is cheaper than wires, but it still costs money to both set up the point to point links (I know you're not talking about broadcast links), and to send the actual data (think electricity costs).
Re:Not for much longer... (Score:3, Interesting)
Throttle the connections based on a moving average of bandwidth usage, then your average Joe can get his email @ max speed, and your average Jane can download her 100MB of wedding pictures @ medium speed, but Johnny 24/7 Pirate will stuck at the remaining capacity (slow) speed.
--
Lies (Score:2, Interesting)
legalities (Score:2, Interesting)
ie:
- child porn downloading / trading ?
- will the riaa sue for all the mp3's downloaded ?
- an anonymous way to spam ?
- etc
unfortunatly a few bad apples always ruin the party for the rest of us.
taking care of illegals? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:P2P on public WIFI (Score:3, Interesting)