New PPC/Linux PDA Reference Design From IBM 254
kinema writes "It looks like IBM has released a new Linux/PowerPC based PDA reference design called e-LAP ("embedded Linux application platform"). It features a PowerPC 405LP, 30MB SDRAM, 32MB NOR Flash, 64MB Disk-On-Chip Flash, 240 x 320 color LCD, Stereo speakers, Microphone, USB (both host and client ports), a 3000 gate Xilinx FPGA, SDIO slot and last but not least a TCPA security chip. I for one would love to see some good PowerPC based PDAs on the market."
Re:PowerPC Advantages? (Score:5, Informative)
You mean an x86? They eat too much power to use portably.
There are a couple of low-power x86 compatibles - the Transmeta Crusoe and VIA Epic - but don't know if they're low power enough. Plus they're someone else's technology whereas PowerPC is IBM's own.
Here's the IBM press release (Score:4, Informative)
Re:FPGA? (Score:3, Informative)
I learned a bit about these when I was in college...when set up right, they are much faster than microprocessors, and can be changed on-the-fly by writing new array logic to it.
Future DRM?
That would be the TCPA chip, my friend. Palladium anyone?
llamafresh
Re:FPGA? (Score:2, Informative)
developer sled (Score:3, Informative)
-----
Additionally, a plug-in "developer sled" adds the following options, for development and debug purposes . .
USB 1.1 host
10/100 Ethernet
Serial port
8- or 16-bit PCMCIA slot
JTAG debug port
Flash programming port -----
Re:lower power consumption (Score:3, Informative)
The 405LP PR [ibm.com]
Re:PowerPC Advantages? Power Consumption... (Score:5, Informative)
The first product to emerge from the Low-Power Computing Research Center is the low-power 405LP chip, which enables system software to control and reduce active power by dynamically scaling processor performance to the level required to support the application. Wherever possible, the 405LP offloads processor demands by use of hardware accelerators and aggressively shuts off portions of the device when not in use. Standby power is also reduced. The 405LP includes a mode in which power is reduced virtually to zero while still providing "instant-on" response to an external stimulus, such as a pen stylus on a touch screen.
Re:PowerPC Advantages? (Score:5, Informative)
Also, anecdotal "PowerPC chips are more expensive" _may_ hold for the PC market, but remember that this is a radically different chip geared for a radically different market (the article mentions a top speed of ~380 MHz!). In reality, IBM has priced this particular chip very reasonably -- wholesale price $100. Those numbers ought to be available soon.
Development of this chip was on Linux right from the beginning, and people were using them around the lab as MP3 players throughout! A great platform for hacking around with.
Re:crazy (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Power/Battery Life (Score:2, Informative)
According to this [ibm.com]
. . . and another one (today) from Motorola (Score:1, Informative)
Here's another interesting announcement [linuxdevices.com] from LinuxWorld today: "Motorola's Metrowerks software tools subsidiary demonstrated a pre-release version of its Linux-based OpenPDA mobile device software platform at LinuxWorld in New York today. The software was shown running on AMD's Alchemy Au1100 system-on-chip based Mobile Client Reference Design Kit (RDK)."
Re:PowerPC Advantages? (Score:5, Informative)
Photos! (Score:3, Informative)
Photos here! [rit.edu]
Not an FPGA - it is a CPLD (Score:4, Informative)
Re:lower power consumption (Score:2, Informative)
PowerPC's major market is embedded devices (Score:4, Informative)
PowerPC 405LP has no FPU (Score:3, Informative)
Re:lower power consumption (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Not an FPGA - it is a CPLD (Score:2, Informative)
CPLDs have a pretty firm definition of having several large blocks, holding many macrocells, with feedback to a global (and often also local) switch matrix.
FPGAs don't have a firm definition, but Xilinx ones use SRAM based LUTs connected in a grid pattern with manhatten routing. Most of Altera's FPGAs have a more CPLD bent, while Actel uses antifuse and flash technology with more of a "sea of gates" look to the developer.
Re:lower power consumption (Score:2, Informative)
There is a working distro [handhelds.org] or two [handhelds.org] for the 3900 [handhelds.org] . The 1900 [handhelds.org] and 5400 [handhelds.org] use the same cpu but the onboard peripherals are different. No one has started the port for these 2 but it could potentially go quickly because a lot of the groundwork is done.
Re:big corporation loses plot again (Score:3, Informative)
You need to look up what Secure Digital cards really are before assuming that they're automatically a DRM thing. Secure Digital [sdcard.org] is a card format that has the ability of doing DRM, but not required. It's a follow on to the MMC cards. Happens to be the same card as the Palm units. See SanDisk for more info. [sandisk.com]
I have Bonzai USB Mini-Drive [simpletech.com] that uses SD cards and I am not restricted in what I can cart on it. Works great as a bit-bucket to carry stuff around and I'm not stuck at a fixed capacity like the more popular Disk-On-Key Flash memory USB things.
Also, don't forget that this is a reference design. If an OEM wants to built in CF or Bluetooth, there is nothing stopping them except for some engineering.
Re:lower power consumption (Score:2, Informative)
Let's not say that. PowerPC chip cost no more in quantity than Pentium4 class chips. In fact they are usually closer to the AMD price point than the Intel price point. The embedded PowerPC chips are even cheaper. The embedded market Intel x86 chips do not even have P4 class chips yet. You're talking 486 maybe PII.
The PPC 405 competes against Intel's Xscale (i.e., ARM), not the x86 architecture. How many Pocket PC PDAs use x86??? Isn't that number very close to zero?
[ Extrapolating the PowerPC chip price, from the price of Mac is folly. 1) the other system components are a more dominating factor of system cost. 2). Apple has 'fit and polish' overhead that they add to the system. That is immaterial to PowerPC costs. That fact that PowerPCs are cheaper has kept Apple in the game; not more expensive. ]
peace
QTopia/Zaurus compatibility? (Score:5, Informative)
It looks to me from the pictures as it the machines is running Trolltech's QTopia [trolltech.com] palmtop environment, just like the Sharp Zaurus [zaurus.com]. This is good from at least two points of view. Firstly it means it's easy to port the existing software [killefiz.de] for the Zaurus, and relatively easy to port KDE [kde.org] and other Qt based apps; and secondly because it means that people producing software for Linux palmtop devices get a wider market with a consistent UI look-and-feel.
Re:lower power consumption (Score:1, Informative)
I think the reason for that is not lack of support, check this (extracted from www.openzaurus.org [openzaurus.org]):