Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Handhelds Hardware

Palm Tungsten Models Reviewed 211

Jason Weill writes "MSNBC has a slightly premature review of Palm's brand-new Tungsten models. These models, currently (as of 11:10 PM EST Sunday) unavailable on Palm's own web site, are the Tungsten T and Tungsten W. The Tungsten T includes a fold-out Graffiti area, new cross-key keypad, 144 MHz ARM processor, Palm OS 5, a 320x320 full-color screen, and 16 MB of on-board RAM. At $499, it's more expensive than most handhelds currently on the market. The Tungsten W replaces the Graffiti area with a thumb keyboard and includes GSM/GPRS phone capabilities. Unlike the Handspring Treo devices, the Tungsten W only works with a handset -- you can't put it up to your ear. The Tungsten W will cost $549, although most American service providers will subsidize at least part of the cost. These models will officially be unveiled Monday, October 28."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Palm Tungsten Models Reviewed

Comments Filter:
  • Another Review Here (Score:5, Informative)

    by tlhIngan ( 30335 ) <[ten.frow] [ta] [todhsals]> on Monday October 28, 2002 @01:31AM (#4545405)
    Here's another review from the folks at InfoSync: http://www.infosync.no/news/2002/n/2495.html [infosync.no].

    Looks nice, but I don't see myself replacing my PalmIIIc yet (c'mon... someone make a non-Sony Palm that's as compelling!)
  • by miradu2000 ( 196048 ) on Monday October 28, 2002 @01:37AM (#4545434) Homepage
    Also announced today was the Stowaway XT - AKA Palm Ultra Thin. If you're familier with PDAs you probably know of the Stowaway- the cool foldable keybaord for PDAs. Well they made a new one, just half as small. Seriously. Same full size keyboard- a preview of it is available here [treocentral.com]
  • Finally... (Score:4, Informative)

    by GarfBond ( 565331 ) on Monday October 28, 2002 @01:38AM (#4545438)
    I'm glad to see the new Tungsten series and Palm OS 5 finally come out. Now, only time will tell whether or not this device becomes successful.

    I think Palm OS 5 will be a winner, as long as it does its mainstay well, while adding on some new features and doing those well too. In other words, it does all the organizing you need it to do and it puts that ARM to use.

    The only problem I see with the T is the sliding mechanism. Anytime there's physical movement involved with a product like this, you have to wonder how long it'll last. If it's nice and durable, there goes my one complaint about the T. If it's really fragile, users won't like that much at all.

    Myself, I hope to get one of these things after they come down in price.
  • Hey it wasn't FAKE (Score:1, Informative)

    by arcadum ( 528303 ) on Monday October 28, 2002 @01:40AM (#4545444)
    Looks like This [slashdot.org]story was nothing but true...

    Keep it comming...

  • Re:Wow (Score:2, Informative)

    by gnuadam ( 612852 ) on Monday October 28, 2002 @01:43AM (#4545459) Journal

    Don't buy into the megahertz myth. Just because the clock speed is greater means nothing. I'd still bank on the pentium.

    Until recently [embedded.com], ARM chips designed for handhelds didn't do harware floating point math!

  • Tungsten W (Score:2, Informative)

    by Frac ( 27516 ) on Monday October 28, 2002 @01:43AM (#4545461)
    For some reason the Tungsten W (Palm's answer to Handspring's Treo) is not featured on Palm's website, nor is it accessible from the products page.

    However, the URL for Tungsten W is pretty easy to guess - http://www.palm.com/products/handhelds/tungsten-w/ [palm.com]
  • by steveha ( 103154 ) on Monday October 28, 2002 @01:45AM (#4545468) Homepage
    If Palm really was losing sales to PocketPC, then this is exactly what they need. But it doesn't make me want to run out and buy one.

    What I have always liked best about Palm PDAs is that they run forever on their batteries. Palm is claiming the new device is good for a week of typical use, but how much is that? The InfoSync [infosync.no] review notes that under a torture test, the battery life was a little under 3 hours.

    I was pleased to read that the emulation mode runs current PalmOS programs fast enough. Recompiled applications should be very fast.

    While in many ways it sounds tasty, I don't really want one right now. And the price is going to need to fall in half before I'll even consider it.

    steveha
  • naive (Score:4, Informative)

    by TerraFrost ( 611855 ) on Monday October 28, 2002 @01:54AM (#4545491)
    The new OS allows Palms to begin catching-up with some of the things rival Pocket PCs can do, such as watching short video clips, downloading digital audio or photo files and even playing graphics-intensive interactive games.

    My Palm m505 already has video clips on it, thanks to MGI's PhotoSuite, which came *included* with the Palm m505. As for it being able to do wave files... so what? PCM Wave files are big. One song takes around 40mb. With 16mb, we'll only be getting maybe audio clips of thirty seconds. So what's the point of having it? And one last gripe... graphics-intensive games are also usually space intensive - Diablo 2 didn't come on 3 CD's because of it's story line, I can tell you that much!

  • by vlad_petric ( 94134 ) on Monday October 28, 2002 @01:54AM (#4545492) Homepage
    Really, at ~390$ (Amazon) you get a 320x240 screen, 200 MHz Intel StrongArm processor, 64 MB RAM, and more preinstalled applications (Jeode JVM & Hancom Office are the notable ones). Not to mention that it's powered by Linux/embedix (should it be called GNU/Linux embedix ?), and, as a consequence, there are quite a few opensource applications for it.

    The Raven

  • by g4dget ( 579145 ) on Monday October 28, 2002 @02:01AM (#4545512)
    The hardware looks pretty decent; I suppose you pay a premium for the compact size.

    However, the software isn't all that great. Basically, under PalmOS 5, your application code runs as interpreted 68k instructions. Only system calls and some specially written subroutines (which, presumably, cannot make system calls), run as native ARM code. Presumably, this will get fixed with PalmOS 6.

    What apparently won't get fixed is the basic PalmOS architecture. PalmOS was designed as a very lightweight OS for simple PDA applications: calendaring, TODO lists, etc., on very simple devices. It was fine for that: small and memory efficient.

    But $500 devices like the Tungsten are in a different class. With ARM processors, they are more powerful than many workstations of a few years ago. You don't need that kind of device for basic PDA functionality--just buy a $100 Zire instead.

    The reason why people pay $500 for a PDA is either because they want an executive toy, or it is for running "enterprise applications", multimedia apps, scientific apps, speech recognition, etc. And for that, PalmOS just sucks: the window system and toolkit are resolution dependent and simplistic, the file system is a hack, the system lacks installers or package managers, multitasking is poor, image support is poor, and on and on.

    So, what does it all mean? If you want a PDA, get a Sony SJ-30 or a Palm Zire, or a Palm m500--they are great PDAs with great built-in apps. If you want a handheld to develop custom apps for, to port software to, etc., get a Linux PDA (or a PocketPC if you must)--you'll pay less and get something that's a whole lot better for the purpose.

  • by g4dget ( 579145 ) on Monday October 28, 2002 @04:48AM (#4545836)
    Would have loved to. Only thing is, none of the Linux based PDA's provide any software for actually syncing to a Linux desktop! ACK!

    They actually do: because they just run Linux and store things in a Linux file system, you can use any of a large number of methods for synchronizing (rsync, unison, NFS, etc.) and remote access (ssh, X11, VNC, etc.).

    the only reasonable way to put a PDA to use today for a Unix user is to buy a Palm

    Well, as I was saying, for basic PDA functionality using the built-in Palm applications, I agree.

    My point is: for anything beyond basic PDA functionality, PalmOS is not a good platform, at least not in the near future. And for custom or third party apps apps, you don't get any support from Palm for hotsyncing on Linux anyway--you are definitely better off there with Linux and Linux tools.

  • by llin ( 54970 ) on Monday October 28, 2002 @05:06AM (#4545882) Homepage Journal
    Hmm on one spec where 'bigger' isn't better...

    Tungsten T: 101 x 77 x 15 mm
    Zaurus: 138 x 74 x 21 mm

    No built-in bluetooth either. Although wi-fi is easier to hook up with the CF slot.

    That being said, your PDA decision isn't all about hardware. The breadth and depth of Palm peripherals and software is pretty compelling.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 28, 2002 @08:29AM (#4546287)
    Check the new Sony Clie's PEG-NX70V/NX60V. Looks much nicer than the Palm.
    Her's the specs and check the link belwo for a tasty screen shot of the PDA and palm OS5

    Model
    PEG-NX70V/NX60V
    Palm OS® software v. 5.0*1
    On-board CPU 200 MHz
    Memory 16 MB RAM/ 16 MB (ROM)
    Built-in digital camera (310,000 effective pixels) 640 x 480 pixels (VGA)
    Video recording and playback*2 (MPEG4)
    Integrated wireless communication slot*3
    High resolution TFT color display (320 x 480 pixels)
    Voice recorder function

    http://www.twomobile.com/content/1305.php

    Harjtt

    : o )>
  • by kryonD ( 163018 ) on Monday October 28, 2002 @09:43AM (#4546727) Homepage Journal
    I'll answer your questions as well as a few of the above posts.

    NTT does make an adapter that connects to a standard serial port with accompanying software to backup info on your PC. Additionally, the phone has a 8M memory stick that I can save anything I want on. I will admit that the ability to sync the phone to software such as outlook is missing, but then again, I've tried using that feature with my palm before and after the coolness factor wore off, I realized that I wasn't nearly busy enough to benefit from it. I am however, a mid-level executive with 40 people working for me and I travel about once every two or three months. I am also single and have a fairly active social calender. I would say a vast majority of people do not fall into a category of being more busy than I am and would come to the same conclusion. I also kind of enjoy the seperation. My cell phone is tied to my personal life. Sure, I keep my work calendar on it and receive work related phone calls, but the emails I get on it are entirely just from friends. I really wouldn't want to be reading work emails on my time off.

    The phone has a Java VM on it and there are tons of applications to download for entertainment, or PDA like functions. FAQs and HOWTOs are available on the net on how to write apps for the phone, so I can even do my own custom code if I wanted.

    As far as the camera being useless....It takes 640x480 256K .jpg's and the phones 4M can hold about 40 at any given time. The memory stick expands that to over 100 pics. I've taken the phone on weekend trips and never run out of space. I can snap pictures and email them to friends on the spot. Plus I didn't have to carry an additional camera around just to preserve the memories. Not to mention that it's a damned great conversation starter in a bar when you take a girl's picture and then play around with it using the phones photo editing software. All that for $190 is more than worth it. You couldn't even buy the 3 seperately in the states for that price!

It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.

Working...