Slashdot Log In
Amusement Park Bans PDAs and Smartphones
Posted by
kdawson
on Sunday May 25, @02:28PM
from the cold-dead-fingers dept.
from the cold-dead-fingers dept.
Ant writes in with news that an amusement park in the UK is trying out a ban on smartphones and PDAs, with the intent to enable families actually to have fun together. The press release says that from May 25 to June 1, adults found using a PDA will be asked to drop it off at a "PDA Drop Off Zone" — no word on what happens if they refuse. But both the Sun and BoingBoing, which picked up their brief story, strike a more ominous note with the claim that "special wardens" will confiscate the devices. If the experiment is deemed a success the park may make the ban permanent.
Related Stories
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.

I understand their point... (Score:4, Insightful)
Reply to This
Oh Please... (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Oh Please... (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Oh Please... (Score:5, Insightful)
A manager at the store blocked my path once, immediately after I purchased something, and asked to see my bag.. the bag the check-out clerk just gave me. I told him to get out of my way or I'm calling the police. He first looked like he'd be happy to have the police there until a little spark went off in his little reptilian brain and he got out of my way.
If I hang up a sign in my house saying "I reserve the right to cavity search" or "I reserve the right to confiscate your property", it doesn't mean I suddenly am exempt from laws against assault or theft perpetrated against people I asked onto my property.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Oh Please... (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Oh Please... (Score:5, Insightful)
That's only vaguely true, and not even vaguely relevant. The owners of private property have every right, legally and ethically, to require visitors to that property to agree to (practically) any terms they want. The visitors are free to leave if they find the terms unacceptable. I can't imagine any US or UK court upholding terms that allow illegal behavior, but for anything short of that, what do you think "private property" means?
And in this case, there's nothing remotely illegal about the terms being set. The amusement park operators are simply not allowing certain devices on their property, and offering a (free?) storage service for those disallowed devices. Visitors can leave their smartphones at home, or in the car, or in the park-provided storage. If you don't like those choices, don't go to that park.
The real issues are:
- Would you personally visit an amusement park with this policy?
- Is this policy a sound business decision?
My answers are no to both, as I assume yours are, but this is ABSOLUTELY NOT a legal/civil liberties issue.Reply to This
Parent
Re:Oh Please... (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Oh Please... (Score:5, Insightful)
Smartphones/PDAs are not just used for business, after all.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Oh Please... (Score:5, Interesting)
Smartphones/PDAs are not just used for business, after all.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Oh Please... (Score:5, Informative)
You seem to be very vocally confused about exactly what's going on here, so perhaps a bulleted list will be of some assistance:
* This is the United Kingdom, not the US, so the Constitution means fuck-all to anyone involved.
* Even if this were the United States, you'd still be horribly wrong. With very very few exceptions, nothing in the Constitution has any jurisdiction over private organizations. I direct you to the first words of the First Amendment as an example: Congress shall enact no law...
* Finally, the Constitution doesn't even remotely say what you claim it says. The confusion you seem to be having is over the Tenth Amendment. It says that any "power" (power to make laws) not expressly given to the Federal Government, is automatically given to the states. It says absolutely nothing about whatever laws the states may or may not have that aren't written in the Constitution.
That's just for starters, so perhaps you should take a political science course or two before your next ill-informed
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Oh Please... (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:I understand their point... (Score:5, Insightful)
The fact is, private amusement parks can have rules, and can ask you to leave if you refuse to follow them. This is just an example of that.
If you're so very important that you can't turn your blackberry off for a day, you have the option of not visiting Alton Towers. If you really are that important, maybe you should turn your PDA off anyway, so your employers can be prepared for if you ever die or move jobs.
Reply to This
Parent
You're all missing the point (Score:5, Insightful)
"Amusement Park Provides Secure Drop-Off Point for PDAs and Smartphones" would be more like it. To advertise this service they have a kid dressed as a policeman "banning" people from using PDAs and pointing them towards the drop-off point.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:I understand their point... (Score:5, Insightful)
Parents are being ASKED to relinquish/put away their PDAs etc, in order to spend 'quality' time with their children.
The article says 'no word on what will happen if they refuse' because nothing will happen. There's no story here, no news, just an advertisement...
...and no need for any nerd to get their knickers in a knot. ;)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Sniff, sniff.. (Score:5, Insightful)
First question: Are they confiscating all cell phones, or only smartphones?
If it's only smartphones, it's a liveable policy -- provided you can buy everyone a non-smartphone. It's still moronic that they're trying to enforce fun -- it's not like it spoils anyone else's fun if you want to spoil your trip by playing Solitaire on your smartphone the whole time.
If it's all phones, well, you've just eliminated a useful tool for finding lost kids, or for preventing kids from getting lost. It's all well and good to say "We'll meet here at 5:30," but it's nice to be able to call if they don't make it.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Sniff, sniff.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Sniff, sniff.. (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:I understand their point... (Score:5, Insightful)
It's a minor story about a crap gimmick Alton Towers are using to get some publicity, and it's being presented here as an "OMG!!!!! They're taking away our rights!!!!!!!!11111" story.
Aside from the fact it's a private amusement park (not a pseudo-public space like a shopping centre), it's not even being done for the usual surveillance-state bullshit "pedos might take photos of our children" type reasons. (*)
You don't like it? Don't go to fucking Alton Towers! I wouldn't...
(*) Given the popularity of using pedos to justify every ludicrous measure, if this isn't the reason being given in public, then it sure as hell isn't the true reason either.
Reply to This
Parent
Not just PDAs (Score:5, Interesting)
Reply to This
Criminal damage (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Smart... (Score:5, Insightful)
Who are they going to call? The parents without the cell phones?
Reply to This
Ban watches, phones, mp3 players... (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
What? But I'm a Doctor, on call...! (Score:5, Insightful)
How will those who are doctors, law enforcement officials and such who are on call or other emergency personnel be able to remain in touch with their call-in stations then and who are required to carry such devices (and may even be issued them as part of their standard equipment)?
And isn't that called "theft?" Or, at least violation of personal property under UK law?
While I appreciate the idea of not having to be interrupted at every turn by some idiot either playing a video game or answering a mindless "WHASSUP?!" call in the middle of a show, there should be some better way to do this.
And what happens when someone loses their claim ticket or, worse, the park loses their smart device? The cost to the park will be far in excess of the "social savings" this ban might give them.
From this side of the pond, it's just another sign that every petty administrator, everywhere, wants to control a little slice of the lives that come into their sphere of influence.
They are going to have a LOT of very angry people to contend with when they try this because, more and more, smart devices are becoming the norm, rather than the exception. What a wonderful way to turn the happiest place on earth into a focus for seething animosity!
Well done, park officious officials!
Reply to This
Re:Just don't go. (Score:5, Insightful)
And second, being callable doesn't mean you'll necessarily take a call. My phone is always on, and always on me, short of airplane travel -- but I'm only rarely called.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:This is a great idea! (Score:5, Informative)
A few things to think about;
1. England != UK. Confusing the two is bad form; our Scots and Welsh brethren will surely kick up a stink at that. 2. Alton Towers are free to trial this. The fact they are trialling it first is a good way to go about things. 3. We use the Pound (Sterling) as our currency - you'll prise it from my euro-sceptic-dead-hands.
Considering the pasting that Labour are getting in the papers and at the polling booths, I'd say us 'British Subjects' are still quite capable of fighting back, in the more general sense of the political climate here at the moment.
Reply to This
Parent