Slashdot Log In
iPhone Trojan Sign of Things to Come?
Posted by
Zonk
on Wed Jan 16, 2008 04:43 PM
from the im-in-ur-iphone-removin-ur-apps dept.
from the im-in-ur-iphone-removin-ur-apps dept.
climber writes "Just days after the first scareware for OSX, researchers are pondering the problems of an iPhone exploit that could lead to larger issues. The Trojan pulls legitimate apps off the phone if you try to remove it, but it only infects iPhones that have 'been modified or opened through a security hole in the system.' Though this worm is more of an annoyance than anything else, it could be a proof of concept for a more serious attack. 'The fear is hackers may be experimenting and gathering research that will increase the dangers of a more malicious attack in the near future. It is clear at least one writer -- the author of this piece at Web Worker Daily -- thinks that the iPhone should be left on the dresser in the morning. She offers several reasons that the device isn't a good corporate tool.'"
Related Stories
[+]
Apple: Fake Codec is Mac OS X Trojan 473 comments
Kenny A. writes "Multiple news organisations are reporting on an in-the-wild Mac OS X malware attack that uses porn lures to plant phishing Trojans on Mac machines. The attack site attempts to trick users into download a disk image (.dmg) file disguised as a codec that's required for viewing the video. If the Mac machine's browser is set to to open 'Safe' files after downloading, the .dmg gets mounted and the Installer is launched. The target must click through a series of screens to become infected but once the Trojan is installed, it has full control of the machine."
[+]
IT: First Scareware For the Mac 301 comments
I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property sends us news from F-Secure of what they claim is the first rogue cleaning tool for the Mac. MacSweeper is a Mac version of Cleanator, hosted from a colo somewhere in the Ukraine. The article points out that the company's About page is lifted verbatim from Symantec's site. With the Mac's market share closing in on double digits, perhaps it's not surprising to see the platform targeted with crapware as PCs have been for years. The F-Secure author adds as a footnote that a journalist said to him something you don't hear every day: "I visited the macsweeper.com website. I know I probably shouldn't have but I used a Windows PC so I knew I wouldn't get infected."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading ... Please wait.

What rock was she hiding under? (Score:5, Insightful)
It's not even a *bad* corporate tool. It's a consumer device and was never meant (in its current incarnation) to be used for corporate uses. You can't even get one if your AT&T number is registered via a business account. It's like saying "this plum isn't a very good orange."
Idiot.
Re:What rock was she hiding under? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:What rock was she hiding under? (Score:5, Funny)
It's a consumer device and was never meant (in its current incarnation) to be used for corporate uses.
Also, it does not toast my bread AT ALL evenly. I am sorely disappointed with my purchase!
Also, what does that link have to do with the rest of the summary?
Re:What rock was she hiding under? (Score:4, Interesting)
True, but even so, many executives have bought iPhones and ordered their reluctant IT dept. to support them. When the big boss speaks, most underlings do listen and try to please him/her. So, IT folks out there, you might as well figure on supporting the iPhone, even if Apple doesn't market it for corporate users. The big boss may come in sooner than you figure and DEMAND support for his/her shiny new iPhone.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What rock was she hiding under? (Score:4, Insightful)
But isn't that the fun and interesting part of an IT job. Coming up with clever solutions that others have not already thought of and pre-chewed and partially digested is what makes the life of a real engineer challenging and fun. This includes supporting Windows, possibly in ways and with methods the folks in Redmond have not even dreamed up yet.
Re:What rock was she hiding under? (Score:5, Interesting)
It uses standard IMAP, with support for SSL.. Standard SMTP with support for TLS...
It can even VPN, using standard l2tp/ipsec.
You don't need any additional software, assuming you're running systems that support the appropriate standards. Yes, the iphone does have some shortcomings but being a hassle to support is not one of them. It's just a case of people being scared of what they don't know.
So FUD... and a non sequitur (Score:5, Insightful)
'The fear is hackers may be experimenting and gathering research that will increase the dangers of a more malicious attack in the near future. It is clear at least one writer -- the author of this piece at Web Worker Daily -- thinks that the iPhone should be left on the dresser in the morning. She offers several reasons that the device isn't a good corporate tool.'
So the summary starts off being nothing more than FUD, and since that won't hold water descends quickly -- albeit nonsensically -- into a completely different topic.
I guess Zonk hates the iPhone. Or is looking for page views. Or something. *shrug* Whatever, none of this makes a lick of sense.
"dangers of a more malicious attack" (Score:5, Insightful)
No kidding. News flash: If the iPhone is vulnerable, then the "dangers of a more malicious attack" are already there. The solution is to fix the iPhone, not to bitch and fearmonger about "hackers ... experimenting and gathering research".
Re:"dangers of a more malicious attack" (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:So FUD... and a non sequitur (Score:5, Interesting)
The only known actual exploit on the iPhone is the TIFF exploit that JailBreakMe.com uses for powers of good (which, while jailbreaking the phone, also patches the exploit it used to do so). People that didn't use that hack likely updated to 1.1.2 firmware, which also patches that hole.
No, it's (most irrelevantly) not a corporate blackberry replacement. It's not really perfect at anything, though I'll say that the solitaire game really lends it self fantastically to the touch interface. But unlike most multifunction devices which really half-ass everything, it does most things quite well and the sacrifices made are understandable and more importantly are not deal-breakers.
*Hey, I'm a stranger on the internet. What did you expect, candy?
trojans (Score:5, Funny)
yes, but (Score:5, Funny)
That's a problem I always had as a teenager. It was easy to keep a condom in your wallet, but the banana got squishy after a couple of days and made an embarrassing mess.
Curious (Score:5, Interesting)
Wrong (Score:5, Insightful)
Anything that starts with "replace the firmware of your device with this hacked firmware" can obviously cause you problems.
I'm sure a Windows Mobile phone is more secure (Score:3, Insightful)
If you think the Windows desktop/server security is bad you should see the Windows CE security! Again, MS have delivered an OS that was designed for a disconnected system (PDA) then tried to put a crappy fence around it to make it secure in a connected world. Too little, too late.
As for trojans, well no matter what OS you run, a dumb enough user with sufficient priviledges can always run a trojan. Nothing new here!
Doesn't this only support Apple's position? (Score:5, Insightful)
Since the very beginning, Apple has told people not to hack the iPhone because it could endanger the functionality and security of the device. Those who did could suffer when Apple updated the firmware. Now it appears hackers have found a way to compromise the iPhone because it had been already been compromised. By the way, the first hack into the iPhone require physical access to the phone so it's not like you surfing in your coffee shop will get you a Trojan. Someone first has to steal your phone and then hack it for this Trojan to work remotely.
Dresser (Score:5, Insightful)
From the linked articleI will have to take the Web Worker Daily's word for it though, since I don't feel like ponying up $279 for a 6 page pdf.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Attack of the Weasels (Score:4, Insightful)
If I had mod points... (Score:5, Insightful)
Oh. And. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Stuffed shirts (Score:5, Informative)
I'm a huge advocate of personal freedom, but on an enterprise-class mobile device, support for centraly managed policy is a MUST to comply with HIPAA, SOX, etc.
1984 does not apply to a corporate environment, sorry.
Re:SLASHDOT SUX0RZ (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Love the tags on this story (Score:5, Funny)