Intel Resigns from One Laptop Per Child Project 338
theodp writes "Reportedly angered by the One Laptop Per Child project's demand that it curtail work on its Classmate PC and other cheap laptops, Intel has resigned from the project's board and canceled plans for an Intel-based OLPC laptop. Intel's withdrawal from the project comes less than six months after the chip-making giant earned kudos for agreeing to contribute funding and join the board of OLPC. It's the latest blow to the OLPC, whose CTO quit earlier this week to launch a for-profit company to commercialize her OLPC inventions."
FPFPFPFP (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:FPFPFPFP (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Doubtful. That lawsuit is bullshit. It brought by a con artist in a country of con artists. Any ruling on it would best be ignored.
Re:FPFPFPFP (Score:4, Insightful)
If they had a way of looking up things that interested them whether it be educational or not it is a light year past what they are getting now. Even if we were to take the $150 per laptop and give them the cash you can note the first paper and look for World Bank restructure, there it tells you even when the countries have money they are instructed by the World Bank what they are allowed to spend on this is quoted "conditions set by the World Bank and IMF within the context of structural adjustment".
The best bet to help these kids is to give them SOMETHING. There are even hits on Google that show the UK is hiring up most of the teachers from 3rd world countries that are any good. These kids have nothing, at least this will give them a chance to augment their lives with some social knowledge and maybe a static copy of Wikipedia. That might give them somewhere to start, something solid, something.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:FPFPFPFP (Score:5, Insightful)
I may be in the minority, and of course I grew up in the US, but I didn't have unprotected sex (or any sex), shoot up with needles or have ritualistic blood letting ceremonies with my teachers in school.
Somehow I doubt things are THAT different in Africa.
Re:FPFPFPFP (Score:5, Informative)
I grew up in the US, but have a Colombian father and was privileged enough to live there as an adult for 5 years, so see how the other side lives.
Priveleged in the sense I got to live and work for pesos, no credit cards, cold showers in the Andes, etc. It changed my life.
Sex between adults and teens is very common and excepted in other countries. I know in Colombia when I was a 30 year old college professor, i could have dated 16 year old girls without too much trouble, parents would encourage it. They saw stability in an older, employed person, rather than a young rake, so to speak.
If you ever read missionary works about Africa, particularly Paul Theroux, you will realize most missionary and peace corp people do get it on with the local people.
And I am not only talking about the visiting teachers, but the native ones as well. It is a cultural thing, and they are are very different culturally than we are.
I would reccomend to anyone that things that thinks are "not THAT different" in Africa(or other countries) to truly vistit them for more than a vacation.
Africa is poverty stricken and a wild and wooly country. If the teacher is the guy with a few coins in his pocket to pay you for sex, to in turn feed your family, then you fuck the teacher.
Culturally, it could be an honor to bang the wise man.
And of course since AIDS is rampany in Africa, I think the numbers are valid.
And if you count no shoes, living in huts, abject poverty, and disease as not different than what we have here, you need to take a leave of abscence and see the rest of the world, not Amsterdam.
Re:Abso-fuckin-lutely (Score:5, Insightful)
Exactly. It should also be noted that not-for-profit refers only to the entity; it's goal isn't to make wealth that is distributed to its shareholders. Salaries are still paid to NFPs' employees including the principals who founded the institutions. Sometimes these salaries are very high.
However, this isn't a failure of capitalism. Capitalism allowed the OLPC to be created at all levels, and it was OLPC wanting Intel to cease it's production of more cheap laptops that caused Intel (who had previously done a great deal of good for the project) to step out. OLPC wanted to be the only game in town. Having more cheap laptops for children in the world is a good thing, regardless of who makes them. If the XO is a better laptop, then people will get those. If OLPC can't meet the demand because their product is too good, better to have a Classmate than nothing. So if you want to demonize someone for keeping cheap laptops out of childrens' hands, then demonize OLPC for biting the hand that feeds it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:FPFPFPFP (Score:5, Interesting)
1) Minimum production runs are required to meet the desired price point
2) Meeting minimum production quantities had been difficult
3) There is demand in the private/consumer market for the product
It seems to only make sense to offer the units to the consumer market, which would solve the minimum production run issue AND help subsidize the cost of the units shipped to their intended market. Especially since, by definition, their intended market is the demographic that can't afford them in the first place.
Extending and promote the "get one give one" program, is one way to do this. Another way is to sell them for a slight profit ($300 each instead of $200?) to schools in industrialized countries for the same purpose. Being a non-profit company does not preclude actually making money.
=Smidge=
Commercial sale risks alliance falling apart (Score:5, Insightful)
Several of the world's most important tech companies, and lots of talented people, work for free at cost on the OLPC. They do this because OLPC is not competing with their own business operations.
If the OLPC becomes a commercial operation, then they risk cannabalising these firm's own operations, therefore OLPC have to tread very carefully.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
The entire OLPC model is causing problems at this point, EeePC just completely stole the market from them with a better device, quicker.
Re: (Score:2)
which is it, free or at-cost? (Score:2)
Several of the world's most important tech companies, and lots of talented people, work for free at cost on the OLPC.
Huh? It's either one or the other- free, or at cost. "At cost" isn't "free". Which is it?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Sure they can. However, it seems that for some reasons they don't' want to. It is strange that they are afraid of Intel wanting to compete with itself in a different market area. Maybe the problem isn't so much capitalism but Idealistic visions.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
That's what going to happen with the screen http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/01/1324240 [slashdot.org]. AMD sells the processor, Marvell sells all the wireless components and there are literally dozens of manual cha
Capitalism (Score:2, Insightful)
The great thing about capitalism is that it allows us to run commercial for-profit businesses that provide capital that can in turn be used for non-profit purposes. By selling OLPC commercially and for profit, money could be raised to send them to communities that need them. However, I think the test for "need" should include that food, housing, health, and infrastructure needs are m
Re:FPFPFPFP (Score:5, Insightful)
I would normally agree with you... Except that a commercial low-end laptop offering by Intel wouldn't compete with the OLPC. Quite the opposite, in fact! OLPC had Intel pouring money and technology into a project that would effectively give away what Intel hoped to sell.
I consider myself pretty hardcore anti-corporate, and I find it pretty hard to call Intel the bastards on this one. They wanted to sell to a market that OLPC didn't want to touch (and apparently didn't want to let anyone else touch, either).
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Okay, explain how "sell to poorer 1st-worlders for $200" competes with "free for 3rd-worlders"? You mention that "the OLPC isn't limited to the dirt floor hut schools", but that doesn't really address the issue. So what? Yes, a poor rural US school could use an XO, but you ignore the fact that if they can afford to buy a Classmate, then OLPC shouldn't give them anything.
Why is a non-compete among partners difficult to understand?
Apparently we disagree on whether or not
Re:FPFPFPFP (Score:5, Insightful)
I think your conflating personal feeling with actualities and are getting confused in the process. But that is something that is expected when you look at things through emotions.
That name is awesome (Score:5, Funny)
Re:That name is awesome (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Why don't you just skip the blackjack?
For profit corporation (Score:5, Interesting)
(burn karma, burn)
her inventions (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm curious about the legal arrangement that allows her to resign from the OLPC project with ownership if these technologies? Was it a volunteer position or something? Using a nonprofit as an unwitting venture capitalist to do R&D on for-profit technologies is uncool, and I have to wonder if it's even legal. (What's to stop all corporations from spawning nonprofit subsidiaries to do their R&D?)
Re: (Score:2)
Marketing data in place ... (Score:5, Insightful)
For an insightful view of the project from India I may refer to 'OLPC -- Rest in Peace' [deeshaa.org], already written July 2006. 'Formula for Milking the Digital Divide' [deeshaa.org] might also be interesting.
Disclaimer.
CC.
Re:Marketing data in place ... (Score:4, Insightful)
For the kind of dollars India has to spend to see a reasonable percentage of the OLPC they could do many different things. Assuming the OLPC really does cost the equivalent of 30% per capita income in India that means if they just buy 3 million of them thats the same as 1 million teachers salaries.
These numbers blow my mind.
Not to mention that India is now probably the largest growing IT country in the world.
The OLPC was meant to be "teach a man to fish and he will feed for a lifetime" , but instead it seems to be more "give a man a cheap JetSki and he will eventually learn to fish".
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Really a blow? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Really a blow? (Score:5, Informative)
OLPC has always been a Linux offering I thought. There is no Windows about it it, and that's what MS has been whining about.
yes, Wintel (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:yes, Wintel (Score:5, Insightful)
it'd have to move completely off the x86 platform to really reduce the possibility of Windows use (and even then, I think CE works on some non-x86 setups).
Anyway, who cares, if someone wants to pay extra and put windows on it, it's their business. It's not my job (or yours, or anyones) to dictate what OS can be used on someones computer.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
OLPC has an x86 based spec, so sure it could, but that's not my point.
But this is closer to my point. If both MS and Intel were on board, you can bet that soon someone would be deciding what OS some developing-world government is putting on its OLPCs. And if this is a char
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's fits pretty nicely what I was saying - nobody should be force to use an OS they don't want to use (and provding options reduces the chances of the person being forced.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Makes sense, from the perspective of them being a hardware company.
Bootcamp makes me chuckle when I hear of it though, I actually know a place that bought a bunch of Mac Minis for a computer lab, because for some arcane reason, they needed vista, and the minis were the cheapest way to get it running decently without getting completely unstable hardware, or hardware that would fail in a year.
Re: (Score:2)
I dunno, he didn't seem to handle
Re: (Score:2)
It's all about learning (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Poverty isn't caused by a lack of computers, and I doubt cheap computers are going to solve the problem. There are far greater political factors perpetuating poverty that need to be addressed first. Until then, the tangible value of this kind of charity is dubious.
Re:It's all about learning (Score:5, Insightful)
But it is caused by lack of information and lack of education.
The OLPC comes loaded with electronic 50 books in the native language, it would cost $1000 to print that many books, even more to ship them to the kids. The OLPC also gives access to the web, which allows an amazing amount of information (and an amazing amount of crap too, but that doesn't stop the information).
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
My son goes to a school where they custom design his curriculum. They have four people on staff who make the monthly work for every student(2-3 inch thick binder every month). There are no textbooks - it's all based upon the student and their capacity to learn.
I've seen this sort of thing in practice and it works - as well as saves enormous amount of money. Just OLPC makes it electronic for
My first computer certainly changed my life (Score:3, Insightful)
While Western folk who may be experiencing guilt may contribute to this project (perhaps quite handily). There is an iso-standard heap of people who are not guilt driven, and are contributing.
This computer will be the Apple IIe, and the C64, AND the Amiga 500 for two entire continents of people. If
Re: (Score:2)
If Nicholas Negroponte and the rest of the OLPC team didn't want people to think of their project as a laptop project, perhaps naming it "One LAPTOP Per Child" was a poor choice.
the software and the content [are] more important than the hardware
I think it's too early to say which is more important. Sugar looks to me to be the most innovative and intuitive UI to be introduced in a long long time, but I can't tell whether it will ever find popularity
Re:It's all about learning (Score:4, Insightful)
To whom? You are thinking of the potential for the western laptop market. To the child in the developing world, the 50 preloaded books and the educational software are far more important.
OLPC not a success (Score:5, Interesting)
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/04/technology/04laptop.html?ref=business [nytimes.com]
I don't see a problem with Intel moving on, they were trying to push their technology but weren't ready (too much power consumption with their proposal). I do see a problem with the OLPC process apparently not working out and little being done to expose this. If more people knew about it perhaps some would step up and buy the machines.
Re: (Score:2)
Could be this continued? Definitely. They just need resources to manage that.
OLPC final version was just released and I bet lot of countries look at first adopters to decide later. So calling OLPC not a success is too soon, I think.
For me, they already succeeded to prove that
Re:OLPC not a success (Score:5, Insightful)
According to GP-posting, they sold only 50000 boxes. Even if the profit-margin was a whopping $100 on each, that's only $5mln — or barely enough to pay decent salaries/bonuses to top 10 executives for one year. The more likely margin was, of course, in single-digits (10 times less), and the people involved were in it for much more longer than one year...
Right. A famous excuse for every failing idea.
Excellent. Tax the citizens, milk the donors — a Socialist's dream.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
But nice try buddy to paint everyone who wants to solve world problems without involving big fat corporations a Socialist. As Linus said, that if Socialist means to do good things to people, then yeah, we are Socialists.
Re:OLPC not a success (Score:5, Insightful)
There is a problem with counties spending the citizens money for what you perceive as a good thing verses you spending your own money on what you perceive as a good thing. The Linus quote was addressing how he cares little about the names being thrown out. Not that he endorses socialism. I'm not aware of any time Linus took tax payer money as a condition of giving Linux away.
Please don't confuse the subject or act like you don't know the difference. You doing something with your own money is noble. You forcing a nation to do the same thing by collecting taxes under the presumption of pain of imprisonment is somewhat a bad thing. Not always but outside of Fire, Safe drinking water and effective security, you know, basic governmental infrastructure, it is generally not good.
Re:OLPC not a success (Score:4, Insightful)
Next, the problem is as you mentioned "A chance", You cannot ensure that the money isn't just a waist because of other factors being the problems. You thinking it might be a good idea doesn't make it one. You thinking the outcome of those actions will create a certain environment doesn't mean it will. You thinking that it is the only way or the best way doesn't make it true. You thinking I need to agree with you under pain and penalty of imprisonment is a bad idea. Surely if it is such a great idea and the case has so much merit then people would be more then happy to fund it from private donations. Including the people who would be paying the taxes.
You see, that is the problem with socialism, if it is such a good idea, then why do you need to force people into it? Why do you need government to make people participate? It would seem that it would just be something already happening with a framework of freedom if it is such a great idea. What happens is that you think it is a good idea and other don't for what ever reason. And the reasons for or against might be just as valid. But when you use the government to force people to participate, you are in effect ignoring all the reasons except your own however flawed it might or might not be.
And no, giving kids laptops isn't securing the future of the country. It is giving kids laptops. if the environment is there that allows them to make something of it, then it won't happen. No amount of laptops will ensure the country is still there in the future. It can only make the future a better place but again, that is dependent on other variables that aren't likely to be present.
OLPC can't be a success (Score:2, Insightful)
It could not be working out for the same reasons, these guys [slashdot.org] failed [wired.com] — they are/were trying to work against a fundamental law of nature.
Steorn tried to violate the laws of Thermodynamics. OLPC is trying to compete for talent with the vibrant economy, that offers enormous rewards to hardworking smart people...
Yes, a project can capture such people's time and attention by appealing to their charitable side. And they will work for no
Maybe not a bad thing (Score:5, Interesting)
It's a blow? (Score:3, Insightful)
Just my two cents,
Peter.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
It's not that Intel was open with their intentions, and so kudos to Intel. OLPC didn't trust Intel. OLPC told Intel that they could join up IF AND ONLY IF Intel dropped their competing product, thus removing Intel's temptation to screw OLPC over. If Intel's intentions were truly evil, they had just been exposed. Intel refused to give up their own effort, thus signaling to OLPC that it would have gotten intentionally or unintentionally poor support. OLPC did the smart thing here, not Intel.
--Rob
No profit in poor people? (Score:2, Insightful)
Are you telling me this isn't true?
Re: (Score:2)
Do rich people drink coke and eat cheap hamburgers?
Re: (Score:2)
THe governments are the main customers and I think opening up internet to the world is the same as improving infastructure whic
markets, ideas and idealism (Score:5, Interesting)
Just Appalling (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, the article is Intel's version of the break. I think that if Negroponte really required Intel to drop the Classmate, it would have been too naive from him. It's almost as if he wanted to pick a fight with Intel and then tell the world that it's Intel's fault and that Intel doesn't want to play ball.
I think OLPC is a great idea, a great project and great technology, but this one didn't look that good for them (at least from the article, which is Intel's point of view, maybe the whole story is a little different, we'll know).
OLPC should try and use the best possible technology to produce the best laptop for the least possible cost. Considering that Intel has been doing lots of advances in cheap mobile power-saving chips, excluding Intel is not a good idea for the OLPC project. With the size of Intel, they are not losing that much by losing the OLPC project comparing to how much OLPC will be losing without Intel's support.
I agree that Intel was not being that clean with OLPC by having their competition project the Classmate, but even then, Negroponte should have been more diplomatic on this issue (again, the article is Intel's version, maybe it didn't happen just like that).
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
What's Intel's value to OLPC? (Score:5, Insightful)
It would have been nice if Intel and OLPC could have come up with an arrangement to differentiate themselves in the developing world market, but it didn't work out. So they go it alone. The computers are quite different, the OLPC being designed from the ground up for its purpose, the Classmate and friends being crippled conventional laptops.
And whether or not Intel and friends manage to kill OLPC, they wouldn't have had a dog in the race at all if not for OLPC.
Re:What's Intel's value to OLPC? (Score:4, Insightful)
You'd be wrong. Intel-insides are actively bidding against OLPC in developing markets. Whether or not the bids are worthy, they are backed by the normal corporate dirty tricks -- including FUD and dumping to name two -- and aimed to kill.
Collectors items (Score:3, Informative)
Great business model.
1. Buy two laptops for $200
2. Give one to charity
3. Sell the other one for $400
4. Profit!
Faulty math (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Collectors items (Score:5, Informative)
You can still profit but its more like:
1. Buy two laptops for $400
2. Give one to charity
3. Sell one for $400
4. Break even on cash
5. Get a $200 charity tax receipt
Your net up is a tax receipt which has value which varies depending on how much you pay in taxes.
Re: (Score:2)
Your net up is a tax receipt which has value which varies depending on how much you pay in taxes.
Good thinking over all, but it's your marginal tax rate not how much you pay. So if you are a middle or upper class working stiff who actually produces the goods and services which drive our economy (marginal tax rates of > 25%), you actually for once stand to make out 'better' than someone with an income driven by capital gains (flat tax of 15%). Of course, an accountant with a sharp pencil might tell you to claim the profit as income.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
1) Buy a bunch of $200 OLPC laptops
2) eBay them all for ~$400
3) more profits
OLPC should simply make its laptops available to the general public for $250-300 and use the extra profit margin to subsidize its give-away/discounted laptops in the target charity markets. This would reduce the number of machines bought/received on charity and resold on eBay for profit while also reducing profit margins on that scheme.
OLPC is doing a disservice to itself
What's the OLPC afraid of? (Score:4, Insightful)
Competition is good. The more different players in this market, the better. Because more innovation will deliver lower costs, and products closest to what people want. If the people at the OLPC care most about getting computing power to the people in developing countries, they'd welcome that,not try and stop it.
The OLPC people just don't get the real world. They closed their "buy one give one" despite that giving free laptops to the sort of people that they claim to be serving.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
1) OLPC board discusses sales prospects in new countries.
2) Intel rep to OLPC calls home.
3) Intel parachutes into the prospects, hijacking the groundwork done bu the OLPC team to sell the Classmate instead.
4) Profit.
Farfetched? I don't think so.
OLPC will stand or fall on the XO laptop itself (Score:5, Insightful)
I have an XO laptop, and it seems pretty clear at this point that the existing XO can do, technologically, what it's supposed to do. The hardware tradeoffs were very clever, very well thought out, and they seem to be manufacturing it successfully in quantity. I'm assuming that some teething pains and glitches, which are no worse that typical commercial products at first release, can be dealt with.
I'm not the intended audience for the software. I don't particularly like the Sugar UI, and can't judge how much is just because I just don't "get it" and how much is because I've been brainwashed by two decades of the Mac and Windows. It seems to me that the software has rather a lot of rough edges. But it doesn't matter. It's perfectly clear that the thing works, and is more than capable of being used in classrooms. The browser works, the Alto/Star/1984-Mac write and paint programs work, the PDF viewer works, the wireless access works.
The collaboration and social-networking stuff seems to sorta-kinda work. I have some reservations, but it's there, and there's nothing comparable built into Windows or standard Linux today.
It doesn't matter whether Intel throws a hissy-fit and stomps out or not. Nor does it matter that their hardware designer left: she completed her work and it was good work.
If their education premises are correct, this device is good enough to fulfill them.
And the XOs not comparable to anything anyone can do in the way of building a cheap Windows laptop. The XO has carved out a very distinct, very new, very innovative niche in product space. Nobody is going to be able to make the equivalent of an XO just by taking a standard Wintel laptop and paring down the OS and replacing the disk drive with 1, no, 2, no, 4, no 8 GB of flash, and adding a Windows version of TamTamJam.
If an Intel and/or a Microsoft truly signs on to the OLPC's education premises and puts in an equivalent amount of work producing something as good, as cheap, and as good a fit to the same product space, they might be able to trample OLPC but OLPC's goals could still be achieved. However, the likelihood of Intel and Microsoft doing this is about the same as the likelihood of GM producing a two-wheeled, pedal-powered Hummer that costs $139 and is suitable for a ten-year-old kid.
Re:OLPC will stand or fall on the XO laptop itself (Score:4, Insightful)
MOD PARENT UP, informative (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
So yes, the specs were less, but that's not how I measure "capable
Re: (Score:2)
- Asus doing the EEE PC (299$ for the cheapest one. Sucks more juice, the screen is not as good in sunlight etc. But still, it owes its existence to the OLPC)
- Microsoft is busy porting XP to the OLPC and trying to improve their offer for developing countries and education
- many people h
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Seriously? Details... (Score:2)
I interpret what you said to mean that they were able to guess or discover the meaning of the icons for the browser, word processor and start using them without help.
I
Screw Intel. They need to be ARM Based. (Score:5, Interesting)
Most arm chips are made with Cell phones in mind as well, some support MMX and Jazelle Java extensions.
Many have Micron CMOS camera chip interfaces and built in LCD drivers, and a mess of GPIO and MMC etc.
Linux and Uboot are a sweet combination on them also.
Look at PXA270 and PXA300 from Marvell & Blackfin (uC Linux)
Also ARM is licensing there chip design for 8 Cents a copy, so you can easily make a ASIC based on arm.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture [wikipedia.org]
Also another option is that there is already $5 computers in China and India. There not laptops and you need to connect them into a TV but still they have Keyboard, Mice, Game joysticks and 100's of pirated games on them. Even ones that can web surf. these are from a Chinese company called Gold Leopard King, but they are impossible to track down and contact, but the markets there are flooded with them.
http://ultimateconsoledatabase.com/famiclones/gold_leopard_king.htm [ultimateco...tabase.com]
The whole computer is just passive switches, and there is only one Chip in the entire PC, it's in the cartridge. Amazing thing, Perfect copies of Mario Brothers, Pac-man, Donkey Kong, Defender, Galaga, Dig Dug. I always get one for the kids when were in India, and just give it away when we leave, it's PAL video out, so we can't use it back in the USA.
Re:Screw Intel. They need to be ARM Based. (Score:4, Informative)
RMI Mips based (formerly AMD/Alechemy) SOC's http://www.razamicroelectronics.com/products_alchemy/ [razamicroelectronics.com] are more open when it comes to multimedia and Linux support.
3DLabs has some multicore ARM mutimedia 2D/3D SOC's http://www.3dlabs.com/content/mediaProcessor.asp [3dlabs.com] . But they don't open the tools and libraries to develop codecs.
Freescale also has their i.MX line of ARM media SOC's http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/taxonomy.jsp?nodeId=0162468rH311432973ZrDR [freescale.com]
Debian/Linux and UBoot support is available for the cores for many ARM SOC's but the problem has always been open source with the multimedia and graphics acceleration portions of the designs.
Intel did this to me (Score:2, Insightful)
Someone please explain to me... (Score:3)
It isn't like Intel is going to throw down the humanitarian angle of OLPC anyways, and I thought one of the selling points to companies participating in the project was that advances there could be incorporated into retail devices as well?
If I'm wrong on this please correct me.
Re: (Score:2)
Egos and Elitism = Fail (Score:2)
I have one of these... (Score:4, Informative)
It is low powered; booting up takes a while; loading rpograms takes a while. Once up and running it's fine.
I don't like the window manager; The frame that pops up is annoying. I would do a skinny drop down of running apps when hitting the top-left corner, a list of available apps at top right corner etc... or something like that
I HATE the journal as a file manager. This is the first 'activity' that needs to be replaced.
The programming games are fun. My kids LOVE the logo like activity the best.
Some of the software doesn't play well together.
The documentation that comes with it is dramatically subpar. You really need to go to their faq to make any use of the machine. One of the issues with that is that some of the faq info (particularly abvout commecting to a network is not available to you before you are online...)
(At least include a pdf with the latest version of the wiki and faq on it.)
The battery life is very good. (This is before an expected update of the system software; particularly power saving features) early 2008)
It is rugged; wifi reception is better than my Macbbok pro. Too bad you can't connect a cantenna easily that way one of these could bridge a few miles and the rest of the laptops could mesh network with it.
I bought the laptop to do some good and mess around with it.
I'll probably use this laptop on my boat (Will compare it to my toughbook; It's definitely a lot lighter!)
Over all I think it's a success.
Hajo
Re:I have one of these... (Score:4, Insightful)
The UI is not awful, and is good enough, and it was probably correct to think it through from scratch instead of trying to riff on the Alto/Star/Lisa/Mac/Windows. But it still tastes to me like other not-so-good UIs, in which the designer and people that can be coaxed into the same mindspace can be convinced that it's better than it is.
I read the human interface guidelines [laptop.org] and I'm not convinced. I've often talked to people who have believed their UI was easy to use because "you always do thus-and-such to achieve this-and-that, and the frammises are always on the left edge, and you ferthboinder toward the top to glorp persistent quibinicks..."
One of the things that was fascinating about the Mac in 1984, which I approached with virtually no previous experience, was that you could intuit it and use it without ever formulating or deducing the consistent left-brained rules by which it operated. For about three days I used it effectively without understanding it at all. I wanted to achieve something, I took a wild guess as to what might work, and it usually did.
I don't feel that way about Sugar, although maybe my brain has just ossified.
If the Journal functioned the way it's supposed to, I don't understand why it, rather than the "home view," isn't the center of the user experience, and the thing you boot into. Seems to me that you'd more often be returning to an old activity than starting a new one.
I "get" the idea of a linear, chronological arrangement of activities rather than a hierarchical tree of documents, but I don't understand how you navigate that arrangement unless you are punctilious about giving each saved activity a good name, and clever at naming them in such a way that you can search for them by typing search strings (which I think only search the name of the journal entry, not the content of the saved activity).
Just saw one today - disappointed (Score:3, Insightful)
The functionality is similar to iPod Touch at 2/3rds the price. If Apple puts this in a larger screen, say an iTablet Touch- that could be a competitor.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You propose giving poor African, South American, and Asian kids big beautiful glass and polished stainless steel laptops and then send them walking home from school -- maybe a three to five mile walk?
They'd get fucking killed. They'd get mugged and every one of those things would be stolen.
It's for kids. Little kids. It should look like it for no other reason than to just keeping these kids safer.
--Richard
a blow to OLPC? (Score:3, Interesting)
IMO, the only blow to OLPC is that they'll start with the FUD again since I don't think OLPC really needs Intel's chips.
And the CTO leaving to start her own commercial business around the OLPC LCD tech is not a blow either. She helped them get to where they are today and that is in production baby. The OLPC project is not going to follow the Microsoft Windows business model of replacement every 2 or so years and probably has a good 5 years life in the current design. Why do they need her position/experience any more when keeping startup costs low is the goal now. Especially since Intel and Microsoft have both helped delay orders and therefore income. OLPC needs to be lean and mean IMO.
Anybody reading this as bad news is just helping spread FUD about the project. IMO.
LoB
Link to Intel 2005 "emerging markets" plan (Score:3, Interesting)
http://www.nten.org/sites/nten/files/Sustainable%20Computing_0.pdf [nten.org]
Seminar about it:
http://www.nten.org/events/webinar/2006/04/21/sustainable-computing-for-developing-countries [nten.org]
Summary: Intel's "Emerging Market Platform Group" details several computers they've developed that are targeted at the poor in various ways: small laptops, cybercafe machines, school machines, etc.
The document dates to 2005. Intel did not discover this market because of the OLPC project, they have been pursuing it for years. Education is just one of the markets they are pursuing in the developing world. OLPC is obviously in the way of the education area marketing strategy, and so they tried undercutting them, then joining them, and now they're back to undercutting again.
The ethical concern here is not competition per se - its that private companies can "market" in ways that a non-profit project cannot: ways that involve special forms of "persuasion" for the purchasing bureaucrats of developing nation's educational institutions. It's not about the poor buying either product directly, it's about their public servants picking one product over another based on, ah, marketing techniques, rather than measurable cost/benefit ratios.
$239/$188 = 27% higher. If the Classmate lasts 27% longer than the OLPC in field conditions, or delivers 27% more educational value in some way, well and good. But I haven't seen that independent study. I suspect, neither have the department heads that have picked it. Indeed, I kind of suspect they've seen a highly-biased, very slick presentation, while lunching on chicken cordon bleu.
"The Economist" on OLPC (Score:3, Insightful)
OLPC's problems, which can be distilled into four main areas, risk turning a wonderful idea into a plastic paperweight.
In their zeal to rewrite the rules of computing for first-time users, OLPC shipped machines with a cumbersome operating system. For example, adding Flash to do something like watch a YouTube video requires users to go into a terminal line-code and type a long internet address to download the software: it seems impossible to cut-and-paste the address. ... OLPC tried to reinvent the wheel and came up with an oval.
Second, the go-to-market execution...was imperfect. There was a lack of documentation, support and methods to integrate the PCs into school curricula, teacher training, and the like. OLPC seemed to think that just by handing out laptops, everything would sort itself out...The consumer is not the nine-year-old user with infinite time on her hands, but a government bureaucrat who has to evaluate the machines relative to other options.
That leads to the third problem. Since the project launched in 2005, commercial rivals have emerged: Intel's "Classmate" at around $250; Acer's laptop at $350...There are many more...All computer buyers will have to compare the XP to a lot of other products in the market--something that never seemed to have struck OLPC's staffers as a possibility, but should have.
This leads to the final problem that has done the most to disappoint OLPC's fans: the hubris, arrogance and occasional self-righteousness of OLPC workers. They treated all criticism as enemy fire to be deflected and quashed rather than considered and possibly taken on board. Overcoming this will be essential if the project is to succeed past its first release. Technology products improve based on user feedback. The OLPC staff will need to learn to listen to the candid criticism of outsiders for the second-generation of the laptop--or they do not deserve to build one.
Ultimately the OLPC initiative will be remembered less for what it produced than the products it spawned. The initiative is like running the four-minute mile: no one could do it, until someone actually did it. Then many people did. ... Mr Negroponte's vision for a $100 laptop was not the right computer, only the right price. Like many pioneers, he laid a path for others to follow.
One clunky laptop per child. [economist.com]
Re: (Score:2)
something bad occurs => blame microsoft?
bleh why am i feeding the troll
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Wow. Go learn [wikipedia.org] something about [wikipedia.org] AIDS [wikipedia.org].
Or, if you're too lazy, I'll spell it out for you: A blind bus driver is actually blind. A gay person may be slightly more likely to get AIDS, but not all gay people have it. And there are other "lifestyle choices" that are actual choices, and actually contribute a good deal more -- like drug use involving dirty needles, or swinging without adequate protection... (Yes